Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 11:26 AM Mar 2016

How 'bout we look at the sunny side?

Our party today is divided between two kinds of equalitarians: some who put more emphasis on racial and gender equality, and others who put more emphasis on economic equality. In the heat of competition, some have suggested that one side or the other is opposed to equality emphasized by the other, but this is not at all true -- we all stand for equality! Divided yes, in a way, but it could be way worse: consider the Republicans, divided between the agents of the Billionaire Class on the one hand and racists and protectionists on the other hand.

So how 'bout we keep on the sunny side?

" target="_blank">

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How 'bout we look at the sunny side? (Original Post) rogerashton Mar 2016 OP
"equalitarians'??? One serves corporate interests and will revbones Mar 2016 #1
Look where her votes are coming from. rogerashton Mar 2016 #3
Really? revbones Mar 2016 #4
Poor black people in the South? world wide wally Mar 2016 #5
Yes, and labor unions. rogerashton Mar 2016 #6
Properly stated, we are in a war between Corporate Socialism and Democratic Socialism. Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #2
Properly stated, "war" is hyperbola. rogerashton Mar 2016 #7
I stand corrected: a debate between Corporate Socialism and Democratic Socialism. Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #9
I'll go with that, except rogerashton Mar 2016 #10
I don't see the party as being divided. bigwillq Mar 2016 #8
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
1. "equalitarians'??? One serves corporate interests and will
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 11:27 AM
Mar 2016

sell her positions at will - such as to the NRA or on the bankruptcy bill.

The other is honest and doesn't take corporate money.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
4. Really?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 11:45 AM
Mar 2016

I don't think so. I think it's a form of self-delusion similar to what republican voters seem to have in many cases.

Hillary supporters are physically unable to see anything negative about her.

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
6. Yes, and labor unions.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 11:59 AM
Mar 2016

And nobody is being stupid. Nor is Hillary. She is a politician and like all able politicians, she will follow the people she leads.

I said, "our party," not "the leaders of our party."

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
10. I'll go with that, except
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:34 PM
Mar 2016

while your characterization of the status quo as "corporate socialism" is interesting, I'm bothered by the ambiguity that always comes with "socialism."

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
8. I don't see the party as being divided.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:03 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:35 PM - Edit history (2)

The party's candidate will win the nomination, and likely the White House. The party is behind one person--and one person only--and the majority of primary voters, so far, are behind the party's candidate.

There is division between the primary candidates and their supporters, of course, which is expected. But the party will rally around the nominee in November.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How 'bout we look at the ...