Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alfredo

(60,071 posts)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:26 PM Mar 2016

Kentucky Republican Senate votes to allow discrimination against interracial couples, and others.

Senate Blocks Interracial, Interfaith Marriages (SB 180)


A Kentucky Senate committee has passed a bill that would allow store owners and other providers of services to refuse to serve interracial couples, interracial families, or couples of different faiths. In addition, the bill would prevent the refused couples from seeking redress through the courts.


http://progressky.com/2016/03/senate-blocks-interracial-interfaith-marriages-sb-180/


Next thing you know they will band together and in the dead of night, destroy the shops of those they see as different.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kentucky Republican Senate votes to allow discrimination against interracial couples, and others. (Original Post) alfredo Mar 2016 OP
I expect this will be challenged rather quickly. SheilaT Mar 2016 #1
This law was probably filed before the special election. alfredo Mar 2016 #3
I don't think it's unconstitutional, but it's superseded by federal antidiscrimination laws. Jim Lane Mar 2016 #8
WTF is wrong with Kentucky??? lindysalsagal Mar 2016 #2
They like making the state pay millions in legal fees. alfredo Mar 2016 #4
K&R. uppityperson Mar 2016 #5
Take the idiots bill to the SCOTUS immediately. jwirr Mar 2016 #6
The Senate is embolden by the election of a Teabagger Brownback wannabe governor. alfredo Mar 2016 #7
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
1. I expect this will be challenged rather quickly.
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:28 PM
Mar 2016

And various Supreme Court decisions in the past would make this unconstitutional, I suspect.

alfredo

(60,071 posts)
3. This law was probably filed before the special election.
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:31 PM
Mar 2016

The special election could have swung the house into republican hands, but it didn't work. Dems still hold the majority. This law is DOA in the House.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
8. I don't think it's unconstitutional, but it's superseded by federal antidiscrimination laws.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 01:09 AM
Mar 2016

The Constitution does allow private parties (such as shopkeepers) to discriminate on the basis of race. That's why many of them did so until 1964. That's why the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was necessary.

If Kentucky were to pass a law allowing discrimination that violated the public-accommodations provisions of the Civil Rights Act, the next baker who refused to bake a cake for an interracial wedding would nevertheless be in violation of federal law. The baker could wave around the Kentucky statute and it wouldn't make a damn bit of difference. In the United States in 2016, that conduct is illegal, and the Kentucky Legislature can't do a damn thing to change that.

lindysalsagal

(20,679 posts)
2. WTF is wrong with Kentucky???
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:30 PM
Mar 2016

Can someone tell them it's 2016, not 1916?

Their 18th century bigotry laws will not return us to the past.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kentucky Republican Senat...