General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDebbie's Record
Here's what I could find ...
Lost the House, the Senate and over 900 state seats while Chair of the DNC
Supported Republicans over Democrats in two Florida districts
Conceded entire districts to the Louis Gohmerts and Joni Ernsts of this world by abandoning the 50-state strategy
Supported a Republican retread for the Florida Democratic Party Gubernatorial candidate (he lost to Rick Scott, again)
Undermined President Obama's treaty with Iran
Shilled for the private prison industry
Shilled for the booze industry
Shilled for the payday loan industry
Blamed the voters for her failures
There must be more. Some here insist she's a progressive. President Obama says so himself!
What progressive legislation has she introduced or otherwise supported?
What progressive candidates has she backed?
What other progressive actions has she taken that I've missed?
MADem
(135,425 posts)Joe Biden has her back, too.
theaocp
(4,236 posts)logic to? It appears to be the complete absence of your own critical analysis. Four legs good, two legs bad only works for so long.
MADem
(135,425 posts)a character from Animal Farm is completely not working for me, though.
theaocp
(4,236 posts)I don't like the idea that anyone supports something just because the leader supports it.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Blind support and name recognition is their motto. They would rather you not ask questions or learn too much about why they do the things we don't want them to do.
Gore1FL
(21,130 posts)This would be one.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)That's it.
Rinse and repeat.
greiner3
(5,214 posts)Rise of the KKK. Guantanamo prison. Single Payer. Hiring of DWS
Rex
(65,616 posts)roody
(10,849 posts)BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)when she really isn't. Obama should have deep sixed her after the Bloodbath of '14.
MADem
(135,425 posts)of her achievements?
She answers to the people in her district, not me, when it comes to her position in the House.
She answers to Barack Obama, not me, when it comes to her position as DNC chair. He's the party head, and he likes the work she's done for him.
Funtatlaguy
(10,870 posts)chew gum, he should easily defeat her.
He should be able to fund raise easily and get a lot of volunteers.
Go Tim Go!!!
https://timcanova.com/
Scuba
(53,475 posts)CrispyQ
(36,461 posts)Some election, perhaps this one, Dem leadership is going to be surprised that their We Suck Less campaign strategy doesn't work anymore. The way they are behaving, I can't decide if they think they can win without the left or if they think we will get in line like we have in the past.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Obama ran on "hope and change," not "we suck less."
Except for the White House, we've lost and lost and lost. I guess they're OK with that. Maybe that was their plan. You know, 3D chess of some sort beyond the grasp of us little people.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)jalan48
(13,863 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Send a message to these corporate gigalos.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Progressive Movement is now set back 50 years.
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)Gore1FL
(21,130 posts)He more closely the ideals we had as a party before we decided to hide scared in the corner as an official strategy.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Oh, and he got all the crap being slung too, as has been slung at what I believe to be his predecesssor...Bernie Sanders.
Establishment status quo good...Progress and moving forward into some uncharted area, not so much. Yet, he took it and moved forward for the good of the country. That's a Leader.
Every month I get my Social Security Check, I'm grateful for his foresight.
He had an advantage as already being the President, so we'll just have to work a bit harder.
Jesus we are fucked if that's what you and the rest of the Hillary supporters think.
greiner3
(5,214 posts)Was a Goldwater Girl and one who did not repudiate segregation.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)mwooldri
(10,303 posts)Also this term "neo progressive" - is it anything like "neo liberal" ? And is the Third Way neo-liberal? Third Way btw being Tony Blair and you know what he did with George W Bush....
Loki
(3,825 posts)Guess we can post anything now.
Care to read something that can be cited? Probably not. Ever heard of American Crossroads? If you are really paying attention, I'm sure you have.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/17/us/politics/the-right-aims-at-democrats-on-social-media-to-hit-clinton.html?_r=0
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)I WAS THERE!
Loki
(3,825 posts)and I'll show you tea party counties that voted for BS. Yea right.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)We beat the party's DLC favorite by 10 pts in the primary, and Debbie Disaster came along and endorsed her "friend", our Republican opponent. Same year she refused to support 3 South Florida Democrats, because they were running against her "friends", 3 of the most extreme Republicans in the House.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)That fucker was, I believe, the person most responsible for losing 2000.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)that's like party treason and she was appointed head of the DNC? Definitely a lot wrong. SIck,sick, sick
What a piece of garbage. She supported the republicans? That's enough evidence she is a fake democrat implant.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Loki
(3,825 posts)I know those counties that voted for BS. They are not Democratic held counties by a long shot. So Republican's came to the polls and voted in the OPEN primary for BS. You may not like it, but that's the way it was. I doubt that Democrats voted for him in this open primary, Republicans voted against Hillary. They knew Trump or Cruz would win easily, so they acted as spoilers. You really think he won? Boy, I laugh out loud when I hear you say that. You don't know my state at all.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)than Hillary, who they despise. They are sick of their own Establishment, but many support Bernie because they are not into Trump's hate. Sure most like Trump, but many do not think he can win the General for the same reason. They hate Bernie's policies in general, but they are sick of the corruption as well. Hillary has brought home to them just who has caused their problems, the ones donating to her. It opened their eyes to notice how their own have many of the same donors.
Bernie's taking on the real power in this country and they know it.
Loki
(3,825 posts)So did I for 14 years. In Houston. You make me laugh. It's not Missouri sorry. I don't know of any mouth breathing tea party idiots that know enough about Bernie to have an informed opinion except the word "socialist". You might just as well say "communist". They are good for Trump all the way. I'm sure you've heard of American Crossroads yes? They've done a really good job on you.
roody
(10,849 posts)Loki
(3,825 posts)They have no intention of voting for him if he should be in the general. None.
roody
(10,849 posts)freebrew
(1,917 posts)I live in a red county. I'm a Democrat.
I voted for Bernie!
I don't know WTH you live, but the teabaggers here voted for Cruz.
No one I know crossed party lines. Got any proof?
mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)if you want to defend DWS, where are you're citations? She's not mentioned at all in your link.
Go ahead, defend DWS and post a rebuttal. We're waiting.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)One would think what with teh Google and the intertubes that some sort of answer would be forthcoming.
But nope, crickets.
As to be expected.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Patrick Murphy over Alan Grayson.
And for the record, she supported at least 5 republicans over democrats in Florida congressional races.
Since Obama and Biden support this ongoing disaster, I guess it says as much about them.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)She should be tossed out.
pengu
(462 posts)He was a max Romney donor.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)"Murphy was a member of the Republican Party, donating the maximum individual contribution of $2,300 to Mitt Romney's 2008 presidential campaign and $4,800 to other Republican candidates, until four months prior to announcing his candidacy for Congress, at which time he switched his registration to the Democratic Party and donated $4,000 to a variety of Democratic candidates."
So the DNC chair supports this person - while her cheerleaders are freaking out because Bernie isn't enough of a democrat to run as one.
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)This is why I am embarrassed to be a Democrat. The party thinks I have no brain ! The party thinks I am a lemming, just go along to get along and accept anything that comes out of a party leaders mouth. No More - not working.
I am so feeling the Bern.
None
None
None
She's about as far from a progressive as they come. She reminds me of the other AIPAC shill, Liarman.
Rahmmy, Debbie, and Joe.
The Three Stooges.
Somebody could make a nice shirt out of that.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Chuck Chuck the AIPAC schmuck
lark
(23,099 posts)All 3 are the opposite of progressive.
I'd buy the shirt.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)And she even got paid!
dsharp88
(487 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)Other than the fact that BHO supports her. Come on, she must have a record of positive accomplishments that Party loyalists can point to! Anyone? I am surprised no one has tallied up the money she has raised or something like that. Of course, what was that money spent on and who did it help elect?
Attacks on sources or posters do not count, folks.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Conspicuous by its absence, Debbie's progressive record.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)1, she wasn't chair in 2010 so all the losses are on Kaine (except for that unmentioned part about losing the senate and even more house seats in 2014)
2. She tried really hard to defeat Ernst and Scott. She really did! Just didn't quite work out.
Now, if that is a 'success' I want to know what a failure is.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)For this alone she should fired and NOT endorsed:
DNC Chair Joins GOP Attack On Elizabeth Warrens Agency
Payday lenders get a new ally
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/debbie-wasserman-schultz-paylenders-cfpb_us_56d4ce38e4b03260bf77e8fc
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)he'll just smile.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)One where you support Republicans and corporations.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)It's the name for the original test to determine if one has syphilis.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Thanks.
Could we get rid of her with penicillin?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Major union leaders have been warning our party for years now, that we can't just assume their support, if we don't start actually delivering on some shit when in power.
Edit: Removing older politico link:
That's a continuous drumbeat I've been hearing for at least 4 years now. Surest way to lose Labor support, is to continue taking them for granted. They could just stay home, or form an independent party.
DWS is part of setting the tone and priorities of the party, meaning, a large part of that problem.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)anyone worse than her? She's a total loser.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Thank you, Scuba! Amazing what one can learn by reading.
For instance, Rep. Wasserman Schultz stated she never heard about President Obama's drone assassination program that had killed US citizens:
The remarkable, unfathomable ignorance of Debbie Wasserman Schultz
The Chair of the Democratic National Committee is completely unaware of one of the biggest stories of the Obama years
by Glenn Greenwald
The Guardian, Oct. 20, 2012
That Obama has a "kill list" has been known since January, 2010, and has been widely reported and discussed in every major American newspaper since April 2010. A major controversy over chronic White House leaks often featured complaints about this article (New York Times, 5 June 2012: "Senators to Open Inquiry Into 'Kill List' and Iran Security Leaks" . The Attorney General, Eric Holder, gave a major speech defending it.
But Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Democratic Congresswoman from Florida and the Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, does not know about any of this. She has never heard of any of it. She has managed to remain completely ignorant about the fact that President Obama has asserted and exercised the power to secretly place human beings, including US citizens, on his "kill list" and then order the CIA to extinguish their lives.
Just marvel at this stunning, completely inexcusable two-minute display of wholesale ignorance by this elected official and DNC chair. Here she is after the second presidential debate being asked by Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change about the "kill list" and whether Romney should be trusted with this power. She doesn't defend the "kill list". She doesn't criticize it. She makes clear that she has never heard of it and then contemptuously treats Rudkowski like he is some sort of frivolous joke for thinking that it is real:
Anyone who observes politics closely has a very low bar of expectations. It's almost inevitable to become cynical - even jaded - about just how inept and inane top Washington officials are. Still, even processing this through those lowly standards, I just find this staggering. Staggering and repellent. This is an elected official in Congress, the body that the Constitution designed to impose checks on the president's abuses of power, and she does not have the foggiest idea what is happening in the White House, and obviously does not care in the slightest, because the person doing it is part of the party she leads.
CONTINUED...
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/20/wasserman-schultz-kill-list
That's the kind of important thing people in Democratic leadership positions need to know, I would think. Thanks for being on top of it, Scuba!
Phlem
(6,323 posts)This is all simple neo liberal, Thirdway strategy at work. All very basic, all very easy to understand, all very revealing, yet will still escape basic analysis from the general US population. Yes some willfully ignore it and double down on the spin.
This fucking wheel keeps going round and round yet we have a nation of people who fucking don't get it.
Ugh! Just,......fuck.
Tragl1
(104 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)are DINOs, and I will not vote for or support any of them, come what may.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)an NFL coach who goes 1-15 in three consecutive seasons. Is is ALL her fault? Obviously not. Is she a competent leader of the party though? Again, obvously not.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Hell yes! ... That silly lady had got to go ...
The whole DLC/Third Way cabal has got to be tossed out on their ears ....
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Progressively moving us to the Right.
Thanks for nothing, Little Debbie.
Response to Scuba (Original post)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)lakeguy
(1,640 posts)for supporting republicans over democrats.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)WTF!?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Wasserman_Schultz#2008
Rex
(65,616 posts)Thanks, how horrible and yet she is loved by the D.C. crowd...they should be ashamed.
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)look who made this list..............................I rest my case........................and we are "all" waiting for the final shoe to drop....................this year---------------------
https://ourfuture.org/20150615/the-28-democrats-who-voted-for-fast-track
Honk-----------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)As some have suggested, she should join the party she most often supports...the Republican Party...I don't believe Dems need a loser like her...even if Obama supports her...
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)when Obama first took office. He presided over the 2010 mid-term elections when most of our losses happened. Not that I blame him either.
Isn't Louis Gohmert in a safe GOP district? How is it her fault if we couldn't field an opponent against him? (I didn't realize we hadn't).
And we all tried our best to beat Jonie Ernst. She had an opponent, Representative Bruce Braley. We ran a sitting member of the House of Representatives. We didn't concede the race--we just lost.
Running Charlie Crist, who was a popular governor, wasn't exactly a crazy thing to do. Besides, he had to win the primary. In the end, it was the Democratic voters who chose him
I don't see how you think she has undermined President Obama's agreement with Iran. (It isn't a "treaty," for the record). She voted for it. But every member of Congress is entitled to their feelings, and to vote their conscience. Chuck Schumer, our incoming Senate Democratic Leader (hopefully the Majority Leader), voted against it. I doubt that President Obama believes that he betrayed him.
Response to StevieM (Reply #74)
Firebrand Gary This message was self-deleted by its author.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)if only they would sacrifice principle for party. . .how dare they want things they support.
maybe we should purge them and become the republican lite party. after all, what have progressives and liberals ever done?
time for a purge. purge those fucking progressives. they destroyed the party. party over principles!!!!
christ, what have we as democrats become?
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Not sure about the primary of Florida or Louis Gohmert.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Hillary must be a progressive because she says so.
Of course those same folks are obsessed with not giving away free stuff and say people should have to work for it.
the_sly_pig
(741 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)that a Republican retread should be highly electaible in a Red area.
So that is not all bad.
I might also argue with the inclusion of Joni Ernst. If you abandon a 50 state strategy, that does NOT mean you are abandoning Iowa. In fact, you should be MORE likely to win a state like Iowa because you are NOT wasting resources in Wyoming or Utah or Oklahoma and you have more to put into an Iowa campaign.
It's not entirely fair to blame her for the bloodbath of 2010 either. In fact, I think whats his name was probably still chair then - Tim Kaine, wasn't it? The House was already lost when she became chair. Yep Kaine was in until 2011. So a lot of the losses did NOT happen under DWS. We may even have come back some in 2012 and broke even in 2014.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Maybe when she gets cancer she can be told she's not allowed to treat it.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)She must be very proud of herself, and her repeated votes to send sick grannies to prison for eating a pot brownie.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)The worse was a reference to worse than prison and really I'm just beside myself someone can be so two-faced and evil and supported by some Democrats.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's amazing. And people still line up to defend her, after she doubles down on that and does the payday loan shit, etc.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)
..the 50 State strategy by design together with the Establishment, because it empowered ordinary people too much. They don't want us involved. We are to be merely the receivers of their decisions for us.
They want us to trust, but never verify.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)grassroots. i swear, venom drips off her lips when she says "grassroots".
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)to jettison this shit bag fake Democrat.