Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:28 AM Jun 2016

Socks knocked off article - The 700$ billion bailout money

Article - really a listing of banks, lending institutions and such - how much they were given and how much they STILL owe. Really interesting in its scope (never realized it impacted so many) .

"We're tracking where taxpayer money has gone in the ongoing bailout of the financial system. Our database accounts for both the broader $700 billion bill and the separate bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

For each entity, we provide a “Net Outstanding” amount, which shows how deep taxpayers are in the hole after accounting for any revenue the government has received (usually through interest or dividends).

Companies that failed to repay the government and resulted in a loss are shaded red. You can see a list of those investments here. All other investments either returned a profit to the government or might still be repaid. Recipients of aid through TARP’s housing programs (such as mortgage servicers and state housing orgs) received subsidies that were never intended to be repaid, so we don’t mark those as losses.. "

Now let me count on my fingers and toes how many went to jail over this. Well, maybe just my fingers. Well, maybe just one hand. Well, dammit, did anyone go to jail?

https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/list/simple

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Socks knocked off article - The 700$ billion bailout money (Original Post) packman Jun 2016 OP
The bail-out has netted 68 billion and rising ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #1
Thank you for stating a known fact. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #2
You ever wonder , "Where did that 68bill netted come from?" packman Jun 2016 #6
So taxpayers made a $1.4 billion profit from Goldman Sachs? Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #3
Profit from Goldman Sachs? - how? packman Jun 2016 #7
We could have given Faux pas Jun 2016 #4
Last I checked, there were many, many more than 700 people in the country. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #5
According to bing Faux pas Jun 2016 #8
Okay ... Now do the math. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #10
Would you believe $2194 a person? Nitram Jun 2016 #14
Why would anyone go to jail? Your assertion makes no sense whatsoever. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #9
Someone - and I'll keep saying it packman Jun 2016 #11
"Someone" TwilightZone Jun 2016 #12
You certainly aren't packman Jun 2016 #13
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #15
Because the thieving bank$ter/jihadists (who have hurt more Americans than any terrorist) jtuck004 Jun 2016 #17
"Bank of George"?!? (Vegas) annabanana Jun 2016 #16
I read through this quickly.......... mrmpa Jun 2016 #18
That chart is an oversimplification, and to some degree inaccurate. George II Jun 2016 #19
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
1. The bail-out has netted 68 billion and rising ...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jun 2016

seems like a good deal to me ... especially, considering what the alternative result would have been; but for, the bail out.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
6. You ever wonder , "Where did that 68bill netted come from?"
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:23 PM
Jun 2016

Trace it down to increased consumer interests , added -on fees for checking and banking routine items, and taking it out of the pockets of the middle/lower economic class.

That 68 bill just did not just appear magically - someone had to pay for it and it sure wasn't out of the pockets and bonuses given to wall street manipulators.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
7. Profit from Goldman Sachs? - how?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:26 PM
Jun 2016

Look at my above post - taxpayers didn't make anything, that money just was regurgitated from the taxpayers thru the hands of Goldman Sachs.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
9. Why would anyone go to jail? Your assertion makes no sense whatsoever.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jun 2016

The bailout was intended to keep most of these banks solvent, and the data you provided shows that it was largely successful. The side effect is that it's $68 billion in the black.

It was never going to be 100% successful - in the real world, not every business survives, even if they get help.

So, who do you think should go to jail and why?

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
11. Someone - and I'll keep saying it
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:43 PM
Jun 2016

And the 68 bill "payback" had to come from somewhere and that somewhere is ultimately your pocket and mine. Don't fool yourself by naively thinking, "Hey, the gov made 68 bill, that's great" . If so, let's do it again, and again, and again.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
13. You certainly aren't
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:58 PM
Jun 2016

But then again, that's you and your opinion. Do you want me to name each executive, CEO, and others . Hold on - let me get that list, I left it here somewhere. Get your head out of wherever you stuck it, wise up and don't be one of the "no one's".

My cat takes me seriously and I value his opinion above yours.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
15. LOL ...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:04 PM
Jun 2016
My cat takes me seriously and I value his opinion above yours.


But, then, (assuming your cat is house-bound) your cat is dependent upon you to eat, everyday. Remove that element, and you might find a different relationship between you and your cat!
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
17. Because the thieving bank$ter/jihadists (who have hurt more Americans than any terrorist)
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:16 PM
Jun 2016

stole from the people - according to a person who put S&L execs in prison for the very same thing. Dr. Bill Black.

You could read the book "The Big Short". It details how the bank$ter/jihadists stole from us, with the very capable assistance of every administration, starting with Bill Clinton and Larry Summers.


...
lack: If Schneiderman had been named Attorney General of the United States, we would know that the administration really intended to hold accountable the frauds that drove the crisis. Instead, the top two Justice Department officials that are supposed to be prosecuting the elite frauds have consistently failed to even investigate the frauds, have denied the existence of material fraud, and came from the same law firm that represented many of the big, fraudulent banks and was critical to the creation of the notorious Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) that contributed to the foreclosure fraud.

AG Schneiderman was appointed to the working group because he has broad credibility as a real prosecutor. His refusal to support the earlier drafts of the robo-signing deal (which was so bad that I described it as the formal surrender of the U.S. to crony capitalism) led the State AGs to kick him out of the settlement discussions.

Schneiderman is only one of the co-chairs of the new working group. The others are federal prosecutors or officials who were the strongest proponents of the cynical deal that would have de facto immunized the elite criminals from civil and even criminal sanctions. The working group is set up so that Schneiderman can give the group credibility while being marginalized. He can be outvoted in any matter in which he proposes vigorous prosecutions.

http://billmoyers.com/2012/02/06/bill-black-on-financial-fraud-investigations/
...



You see, in the past 8 years, the Democrats, after having gotten large donations from the bank$ter/jihadists, whose actions threw 8 million FAMILIES to the curb, and moved tens of millions into or nearer poverty, abrogated their responsibility to the taxpayers, made the bank$ter/jihadists whole and told the working people who had trusted them that they don't matter.

So the lying, thieving, friends of the Democrats got rich - here's what the people got -

Before the financial crisis there were only 26.3 million people on food stamps.




Here is a discussion with Timothy "Killer" Geithner, where he tries to spin what happened, where an entire audience of voters laugh in his lying face, and n Stewart points out how the administration went to hell and back to help their bank$ter/jihadists but not the taxpayers.
http://www.cc.com/shows/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart/interviews/z9b8f1/timothy-geithner-extended-interview


That's why they should go to fucking jail. But instead people who take money from them fail to act, cover things up, and make excuses. We will see in November what that might mean, when people are told not to vote for the real estate swindler because he will disrespect and treat them badly.

What's left of them, anyway.

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
18. I read through this quickly..........
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:22 PM
Jun 2016

I was intrigued by Fidelis Federal Credit Union in VA, that received a mere $14,000 & it has been returned. Credit Unions are great.

George II

(67,782 posts)
19. That chart is an oversimplification, and to some degree inaccurate.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jun 2016

Most obviously,

"Our database accounts for both the broader $700 billion bill....", yet the chart shows total disbursements of $620B. With that, I won't get any deeper into that.

Seems like subjective liberties have been taken by Pro Publica.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Socks knocked off article...