Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 02:14 PM Jun 2012

The War on Old Folks

http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/13351/the_war_on_old_folks/


Old folks in Chicago protest cuts in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in Chicago on Nov. 7, 2011.

’m sitting here feeling my bile rise as I eye the cover of the publication I most love to hate, AARP The Magazine. This one features Diane Keaton and promises to explain “How she stays forever young.” The featured tip? “Take risks – do things you can’t imagine!” Month in and month out, this rag features well-preserved, wealthy, beaming celebrities who suggest that aging can be defied, and also that it’s just one big blast.

I’d like to see a somewhat different cover. This one would feature a sick, homeless grandma taking risks and doing all the things Keaton can’t imagine. Like living without Medicare. Or Social Security. Or affordable housing. Because if the Republicans get their way, more and more retirees are going to be increasingly impoverished. Sarah Palin and others may have gone ballistic over alleged “death panels,” but the real ghouls facing older people are the right-wingers in Congress, and in all too many state houses and legislatures.

While the Republican War on Women has gained national attention, there has been less outrage over the Republican War on Older Americans. But the battles are everywhere. State after state is going after pension funds. Here in Michigan, for example, one of the first things Republican Gov. Rick Snyder did was to impose new and higher taxes on retirement income and public pensions. Making matters worse, our state’s long recession forced many people in their 50s to take early retirement as employers downsized. When you retire early, your benefits are lower than if you wait until you’re 65. So now, a larger percentage of smaller retirement eggs will be subject to income tax. Why? To make up for cuts in the state’s business taxes.

Beyond Michigan, the AFL-CIO finds that older workers who lose their jobs have the highest rate of long-term unemployment, which in turn means significantly reduced retirement income. Plus, they often have to tap into what savings they have to get by.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
2. THis is one subject that Rachel Maddow pisses me off on.
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:37 PM
Jun 2012

She does one of those MSNBC ads where she says thanks to Social Security
us older folks are really doing OK! I beg to differ but................

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
4. I beg to differ also.
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:44 PM
Jun 2012

I am collecting social security, but I am not doing OK. If it wasn't for some savings that I have, I would not be able to make it.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
3. Old folks went strong for Republicans in 2010
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 03:44 PM
Jun 2012

So they get what they voted for. Were they expecting something different?

jehop61

(1,735 posts)
13. Interesting....
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 05:12 PM
Jun 2012

Since SOME older people voted republican, you don't really care if ALL older people have financial difficulties. Hey, lets put us all out on the ole ice flow, we're getting in the way.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
6. it's outrageous
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 04:13 PM
Jun 2012

how we treat the elderly, the very people who built this country. These are OUR citizens, our veterans. Losing homes, and savings wiped out if they need nursing home care is barbaric. In Norway, for example, if they need nursing home care, they get it. No Medicaid hoops to jump through, no "spending down" your life savings, no liens on the family farm, they just get it, and 85% of their pension (what we call Social Security) pays for it.
We are penalizing our citizens for the crime of becoming old.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
11. The elderly are our backbone
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 05:11 PM
Jun 2012

And this bs Mormon shit is going to get buried in national polls when the elderly see what it means for them. There is nothing benevolent about the LDS - Romney's church. It's all about exploitation.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
15. The nerve of them to continue breathing after we can no longer
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 05:20 PM
Jun 2012

squeeze any value from their existence. Talk about inconsiderate.
K&R

patrice

(47,992 posts)
8. I wonder how many of us are also helping children, in IT especially, with ballooning student loans.
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 05:02 PM
Jun 2012
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
9. You got a Mormon that wants to make the country a Mormon theocracy
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 05:06 PM
Jun 2012

and you think old folks of that era are concerned about anything?

Shit, they have been canning vegetables for years, and no matter what happens, won't be taken down.

I think you really don't understand the Deep South.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
12. And I think they don't really understand the various kinds of values lost to Social Darwinism, which
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 05:12 PM
Jun 2012

losses they will not discover until it's too late.

That's what happens when you don't know that you don't know what you don't know.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
10. And then there's the latest "life-line": Reverse Mortgages, which, though you don't lose title, CAN
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 05:08 PM
Jun 2012

eat up what little wealth some of us have left to will to our children and CAN even result in them holding title to property that's upside-down in the market, after we pass on.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The War on Old Folks