July 7, a date of O'Reilly meltdown infamy: the COMEY inquisition; the AILES lawsuit; Kate's Law
So the day's obsession was supposed to be all about COMEY. But the day before, the AILES lawsuit was all over the place, and with it in many or most of the news items were summaries of past Faux sex rumors plus O'LOOFAH's own harassment settlement. And we know how much O'LOOFAH *hates* having his wall of Denial pierced and his belief in his moral superiority smashed in his face!1
But also the Repuke senators failed with Kate's Law, which he has claimed as something to be MisDirected about for his being outraged, as opposed to his needing to face his personal demons, which would be the appropriate targets for his outraged attention.
So all these things happened within 24 hours, and that evening he was *blistering* one of his guests, ostensibly over Kate's Law. I think there's video inside the link, the guest being smilingly unflappable, despite O'LOOFAH's usual bullying and complete ignorance of The Law/legalities.
(I use "O'Reilly" in the title because I suspect he has a whole crew dedicated to doing Searches of his surname for every last mention, while "O'LOOFAH" is my *smear merchant* little amusement.)
********QUOTE*******
http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/07/07/oreilly-ends-interview-conservative-judicial-activist-disagreeing-him-kates-law/211438
[font size=5]O'Reilly Ends Interview With Judicial Activist For Disagreeing With Him On "Kate's Law"[/font]
.... RING: Because you know what an aggravated felony is? It is not just a violent crime. That could be failure to appear in court. That could be a fraud offense. ....
O’REILLY: No it's not.
RING: Yes, it can be.
O’REILLY: Aggravated means there is some kind of violence attached to it. It could be drug dealing, hard drug dealing is aggravated.
RING: No. That just means you don't know what's in the statute because the immigration law defines what's an aggravated felony, and so it could be failure to appear. And all --
O’REILLY: This all defined it would be a violent offender and it’d have to be a conviction of such, a felony conviction. Look, Mr. Ring, I have got to tell you and I’m not going to say it with all due respect. You lied in your original column and you’re lying tonight. And I'm going to leave you now because you are not an honest man and we don't like that on The Factor. All right? Thanks for coming on.
********UNQUOTE********
= new reply since forum marked as read
Poor poor Ailes, his empire is falling apart. I don't think General Loofah will be able to rally his troops and save the day. Delusional crackpot reality from crap spewers only lasts so long.
