General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDallas Mayor Calls Bullsh*t On Open Carry: It Didn’t Help During Shooting, And Made Things Worse
http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/politics/dallas-mayor-calls-bs-on-open-carry-it-didnt-help-during-shooting-and-made-things-much-worse/Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings (D) stood next to Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) and dropped an extremely uncomfortable reality check: Open Carry, the movement pushed with near-fanatical obsession by Texas Republicans, not only did nothing to help stop the mass shooting of police officers in Dallas, but it actually made the situation far worse. Open Carry had an opportunity to justify its existence and it failed on every conceivable level.
For Rawlings, examining the aftermath of the shooting made it clear that having dozens of scared civilians clinging to assault-style weapons during a mass shooting was a recipe for disaster. The good guys with guns didnt suddenly become action heroes bravely stopping a heavily-armed lunatic. They acted like any of us would: When the shooting started, they scattered in every direction in terror of their lives. Only unlike others, these fleeing victims were strapped with weapons that sowed confusion. Any of them could have been a shooter attempting to blend in. At a moment when cops were being targeted by a sniper, officers had to track down these innocent gunmen just to make sure they werent one of the bad guys.
As Rawlings explained:
Its logical to say that in a shooting situation, open carry can be detrimental to the safety of individuals.
Heres how bad the situation became in Dallas during the shooting:
Rawlings said Dallas police Chief David Brown told him that people running through the shooting scene with rifles and body armor required officers to track them down and bring them to the police department. Whether that was time that could have been spent trying to find and stop the shooter is something police will have to comment on, Rawlings said.
In other words, the exact reason gun rights activists often give to justify guns everywhere bills is false. They dont keep people safe, they put peoples lives at risk by causing chaos.
A major in the Dallas police department was equally furious about the danger Open Carriers put the rest of the population in. Maj. Max Geron pointed out that the police scanner was filled with chatter of confused officers desperately trying to figure out who was a bad guy and who was an Open Carry supporter while calls of officer down continued to ring out.
/Snip. More at link.
gopiscrap
(23,758 posts)watch him not get re-elected
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... local elections.
Rawlings has been stand up so far
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)The primaries would be between him and someone to his left actually.
Liberal In Texas
(13,548 posts)Despite how all the Texas bashers like to paint the whole state with a broad brush, Mayor Rawlings is mostly very liberal. (I disagree with him about the toll road they want to put on the Trinity River levees, but that's another story.) The biggest challenger he had in the last election was Marcos Ronquillo, who can only be described as even more liberal.
Dallas County is blue, we voted for Obama twice. The Dallas County Judge, Clay Jenkins (who is the head administrator for the county) is also very progressive. You might remember how great these guys preformed during the Ebola scare. Many members of the City Council are also progressive. Democrats don't win all of the elections every time, but we do well here.
Our Flag (for real)
Warpy
(111,254 posts)The best predictor of dying from gunshot is owning a gun or living in a home where a gun is kept.
Guns don't make anyone safer. Proximity to them is life threatening.
Long guns are necessary tools in rural areas, so a total ban on civilian firearms is not going to happen. However, we can do better than we are doing now. Rescinding open carry laws is a good first step.
calimary
(81,238 posts)More guns = MORE CARNAGE! Here's more proof.
cynzke
(1,254 posts)But it didn't stop a deranged individual DETERMINED to kill people. Then in the chaos that ensued, the police had no idea who was possibly the bad guy among those civilians lawfully OPEN CARRYING their weapons. On the other hand, had this been a gun free zone, it would have been more difficult for this deranged man to access the area with his weapons by merely walking out in the open. Had he been seen, the police would have stopped him. No guarantee the loon could have been stopped, but the odds were then in favor of it.
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Jopin Klobe
(779 posts)... unless it affects them directly ...
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)AllyCat
(16,184 posts)muntrv
(14,505 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Hangingon
(3,071 posts)There is a distinction between open carry of a long arm and hand guns. The rules are different. Long arms may be carried but must be unloaded. To me, open carry of long arms is for show and does harm to RKBA.
The mayor contends that this incident is proof of the uselessness of civilian carry. Any open carrier or CHL who has been trained would have stayed out of the way and let the police handle the action.
Stinky The Clown
(67,798 posts)Hangingon
(3,071 posts)The police cannot stop.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)because they had no idea who was shooting who ANYONE WHO WAS SEEN WITH A GUN WAS TO BE DETAINED.
"Trained" or not.
Waste of time and resources, added to the confusion, and frankly, dog lucky under extraordinarily chaotic and fearful times that law enforcement was disciplined and restrained enough to not end up shooting anyone of these people.
Hangingon
(3,071 posts)And dealt with it. It is regrettable that time w's spent clearing the long arm oc. It would not have been my choice to carry to such an event. It was his right.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,417 posts)IF you and I were there and both exercising our rights and somehow you were running at me with a long rifle and I was crouched behind a car with my weapon and FELT MY LIFE WAS IN DANGER would you be upset if I shot and killed you?? Reason I ask is that here in Florida I'm almost a 100% sure I'm within my legal rights to do so.
Hangingon
(3,071 posts)It would not indicate threat to someone with training. If I was shot, I would be upset and would hope the police and prosecutors would also be upset. Upset to the point of prosecution of the shooter. But I guess I would not know since I would be dead - righteous but dead.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,417 posts)makes that a hit or miss for most people I would guess. I spent 6 years in the USMC and can tell you that if I was running with a rifle it would be in my hands rather than banging off my legs n back - those 6 years in the corps (71-77) showed me very few people are capable of rationale decision making when under duress - and we were all supposedly trained.
do appreciate your taking the time to respond to my original query...
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Some people believe that carrying provides an auxillary force for LEO, this includes some advocates of bearing arms. But the chief function for civilian carry is self-defense, not "helping out" the cops, so I agree there.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)they really don't know what's going on.
people need to use critical thinking.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)How about one open carry amusement park in Texas where all the ammosexual assholes can go kill each other if that's what they want to do. I'd contribute to having it built and so that it could offer FREE admission and BEER!!!
Should we start a GO FUND ME account?
rladdi
(581 posts)the Republicans passing a bill. The NRA and ALEC Org. have been shoving that down ever states throat for a years, Another one is carrying guns on college campuses and bars. For some reason, common sense doesn't mean anything to the NRA or Republicans And they actually cannot give any good reasons for their actions. About 2 weeks ago a new assault weapons manufacturing plant opened up in GA. For some reason NRA and GOP just continues the promotion of those war weapons.
It amazes me at how some radical law makers/ politicians ever get elected with their views. i
I feel this November election is a turning point on the survival of the USA.
Also I believe Dallas Chief Brown son was killed by a Cop in Phoenix, AZ a few years ago. Never any charges.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)by the cop. In a situation like that, there is no reason for the responding officer to be charged.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)Chief Brown has endured more grief due to gun violence and drug culture than any human being should have to endure.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)malaise
(268,967 posts)Rec
maryellen99
(3,788 posts)A woman who was with her parents during the Luby's shooting and says if she had her gun,which she left in the car,she could've saved her parents who were killed?
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)"concealed" in her purse would do it.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Straw Man
(6,623 posts)A woman who was with her parents during the Luby's shooting and says if she had her gun,which she left in the car,she could've saved her parents who were killed?
That was Suzanna Hupp. She advocated for concealed carry. Texas law at the time allowed her to carry her pistol only in her car, which is where it was when she saw her father killed in front of her. Her mother was killed while trying to follow Suzanna to safety through a broken window.
vkkv
(3,384 posts)brett_jv
(1,245 posts)Dozens of armed, trained LEO's and they still weren't able to prevent 5 of their own from being killed. Hell they didn't even kill the shooter with their guns, they had to use a remote-detonated bomb on a robot to take him out.
Let me just also point out I've been SAYING THIS EXACT THING in my arguments with the ammosexuals on FB and elsewhere for friggin' YEARS.
Having a bunch of armed (but most likely, untrained) civilians in a chaotic mass-shooting situation is probably the WORST POSSIBLE THING. All it does is create more danger, more confusion, and make it harder for the police (the ones who's actual JOB it is to deal with it, and also the ones TRAINED to deal with it) to get a handle on the situation.
If any of the open-carriers had decided to try to 'take matters into their own hands' and fire back at the sniper, they almost surely would've got shot by the cops ... Shit, the cops have NO WAY of knowing whether you're 'on their side', or another one of the perps. They pretty much HAVE to shoot your ass.
People carrying guns around cause they fantasize that they're one day gonna get to be a big 'hero', cuz they went all Rambo on some bad guy ... is just fcking stupid ... unless your real aim is suicide by cop.
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)and it failed like three times, good guys against the bad guy--------------the bad guy won all three times, -------------amazing
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)You want to restrict gun rights because the police couldn't stop an ambush from killing multiple people?
brett_jv
(1,245 posts)I didn't actually say anything about 'restricting gun rights', now did I?
Here's another article on the matter ... pretty spot on if you ask me ...
among other reasons.....................
underpants
(182,788 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)tblue37
(65,340 posts)Arizona Roadrunner
(168 posts)When I went through some police training at a college level in the late 50's, we were told if you have to shoot it is for control meaning if you can shoot them in a limb which will allow you to have control, that is what you do. You don't automatically "shoot to kill".
The problem today is that it appears that since so many people can carry guns with or without permits depending on the state, many police appear to over react just because someone has a gun even if it is in his pocket. I have read several stories where people who had guns refused to get involved with going after a "shooter" because they knew when the police arrived, just by having a gun, they might get shot. Therefore, what good is it to carry a gun if you are not going to be able to use it or have to fear that just by having a gun, you will be shot and probably killed since they shoot to kill?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Committing an accident though, is far more problematical.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)The 90 figure is the high end of estimates of -15yoa kids killed every year by gun accidents.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)No one teaches shoot to wound. Notion being if you are shooting in the 1st place your life is in IMMEDIATE danger.
I also think many civilians carry a gun not to be heros and save everyone, but just to prevent being a victim themselves/loved ones from typical violent crimes.
Arizona Roadrunner
(168 posts)Who defines "immediate"? Does just the possession mean you are of sufficient "immediate" threat to shoot to kill? By the way, one should also look at the role if Insurance companies in this situation too. Under what circumstances do they pay claims etc.?
Sorry but most "open carries" are doing so to "show off". If you are serious about not being a victim, you don't open carry because if someone wants your "stuff" and you are open carry, they will shot you first and deal with the rest later.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)but past that, if you are shooting that decision has already been made - and you are in DEEP shit, so trying to pick off body parts is not a good idea.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)the standard in law enforcement today is to shoot to kill, basically.
Anyone who would suggest trying to "wing" someone is a training would get dressed down in a pretty clear manner by the trainer.
That said, I agree totally on the open carry stupidity.
Just childlike black and white movie fast draw stupidity.
realmirage
(2,117 posts)In this scenario you have a hidden sniper, which concealed carry does little to counteract. But in a different case like, say, the one in Paris, concealed carry could have been effective.
You can't take this one scenario in Dallas and apply it to all situations.
Paladin
(28,254 posts)malaise
(268,967 posts)WcoastO
(55 posts)Like clockwork, the conservatives who up until yesterday were all about Blue Lives Matter turned on police because of these comments. According to the president of Open Carry Texas C.J. Grisham, officers should be fired for complaining about his right to carry an AR-15 in public.
If you cant identify a threat, you shouldnt be wearing a uniform. Its not that difficult to tell the difference between a bad actor and a good actor.
Were Castile, Sterling and Tamir Rice "bad actors"?
randr
(12,412 posts)I guess the founding fathers had it right to start with.
bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)when citizens kept their guns at home for safety and for hunting
and the police were likely the only ones armed
it made police jobs easier too
Now even our finest have fear too
This is not working
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)But they stayed there. No one carried them around to prove their manhood.
bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)strict rules about transport, had to be in trunk, unloaded
usually they only were transported to the firing range
or for deer season
I doubt the genie can be re-bottled
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)I am not sure why people don't realize how hard could be to figure who's who in a shootout without uniforms.
groundloop
(11,518 posts)Gee, if they'd have only been wearing their 'I'm a Good Guy With a Gun' hats and badges the cops wouldn't have had to waste all that time figuring out who they were.
Pakid
(478 posts)it needs to end nationwide and end now!!!!
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)upon the "taming" of the wild west was that every yahoo and his drunk uncle wasn't walking around with a pistol strapped to their leg making every imaginable conflict a potential shoot-out.
RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)No one has a responsibility to use any weapon to protect anyone. This includes law enforcement.
Photographer
(1,142 posts)RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)If I have a gun and witness someone shooting people I do not have to do anything.
Photographer
(1,142 posts)I'm guessing you are trying to defend open carry?
RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)they are or have to protect anyone.
Photographer
(1,142 posts)no mention of open carriers being obliged to protect the feckless remnants of society such as myself who have decided not to carry firearms?
Orrex
(63,208 posts)A militia that doesn't protect anyone is nothing more than a bunch of posers standing around oiling their barrels.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)No different than these guys:
Stinky The Clown
(67,798 posts)brett_jv
(1,245 posts)in the first place.
Pretty damn good chance, they were white dudes. The one photo of 'em I've seen ... showed a white person with a AK-looking gun on his back (sorry if that's wrong, not a gun lover).
And I'd bet $$$ to donuts that they were ALL there ... to with the explicit intent of intimidating the peaceful BLM protesters with their big 'ol guns. KNOWING that there's basically no chance any BLM'ers are going to show up armed to this sort of event.
I'd also wager that, at a minimum, 10 out of the 20 were PRAYING that riots and looting would break out, so they'd have a chance to do them some c**n huntin' (their thoughts, not mine, don't mean to offend anyone but THEM).
IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)because guns make people look like they might be bad.
This started with two men being shot dead for telling police they have guns, without even touching the guns or committing any crime. Having a gun can get you killed.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)bora13
(860 posts)great minds think alike. to bad much of the country has a problem one way or another with reason.
Skittles
(153,159 posts)this this evident to ANY NON-GUN HUMPER
40RatRod
(532 posts)The only three sites I could find it on are extremely suspect and are known as such!!!. I don't want to be left hanging when I post this as a fact and have my "wingnut friends" correct me. I have a bad habit of researching their rabid posts and correcting them with facts.
Thanks, Carl
Liberal In Texas
(13,548 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)lostnfound
(16,177 posts)Probly already did
RussBLib
(9,008 posts)Fat chance.
Dream on.
Their dicks are inextricably wound around their guns.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)when a citizen uses his gun against what he views as an oppressive government agent(like an aggressive policeman), all hell breaks loose. Just another anti-reality view from the gun culture.