Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe GOP Platform will declare coal to be 'clean'!!!
From Phil Plait: "Clean" Coal? Yeah, Not So Much:
If you thought the upcoming GOP national convention was going to be anything other than a look into a parallel dimension, then heres a taste of what to expect. On Monday, the Republican National Committee had a hearing to work out the wording for the GOP platform, their list of beliefs and goals supported by the party and its members.
During these hearings, one of the topics was the use of coal. David Barton, a delegate from Texas, had an edit he wanted to make to a sentence in the platform:
I would insert the adjective clean along with coal particularly because [of] the technology we have now. So, the Democrat party does not understand that coal is an abundant clean affordable reliable domestic energy resource.
................//snip
Coal has a lot of other things in it besides carbon, including mercury, sulfur, and more. These pollutants get into the air and cause a lot of problems, including thousands of premature deaths every year. Scrubbing these toxins out of the coal is costly and very difficult, though new power plants do a better job at this than old ones.
But the elephant in the room is that carbon. Burn it and it combines with oxygen to make carbon dioxide, and this of course is a greenhouse gas. Humans put about 40 billion tons of CO2 into the air annually, far more than any natural source on the planet (including volcanoes). Because this is heating the Earth up and changing the climate, its important to figure out a way to capture the carbon and somehow store it to prevent it from getting into the air. This is called carbon capture and sequestration, or CCS.
The problem? The technology to do this doesnt exist. Not in any real sense of the word, that is. There have been some pilot projects done, but theyve managed only to scratch the surface in the vast amount of CO2 released.
Phil does note Barton's use of "Democrat Party," rather than Democratic:
Note Bartons use of the phrase Democrat party, a term used specifically to make them sound bad. If someone uses it to start a sentence, you can be sure that the next thing they say would be useful as fertilizer.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 516 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The GOP Platform will declare coal to be 'clean'!!! (Original Post)
LongTomH
Jul 2016
OP
I would add that even scrubbers (which are never perfect) don't make coal clean.
Statistical
Jul 2016
#1
Statistical
(19,264 posts)1. I would add that even scrubbers (which are never perfect) don't make coal clean.
They simply move the toxins somewhere else. So instead of heavy metals and radioactive material in the air it stays in the fly ash. Granted that is better but it doesn't magic it away. The fly ash builds up and builds up and eventually you get a flood and the dike around the fly ash pond breaks and you get this.
Coal is death. Even if CO2 wasn't an issue coal is death. Coal will always be death.