General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBwahahaha. Attention whore and uber Christian Tim Tebow bails on Trump
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/07/14/tim-tebow-dumps-trumps-convention-speaking-republicans-cleveland.htmlHe posted a video on his Facebook but none of us really want to see it. You can follow the link if you'd like.
First Palin, now Tebow. Next week will be fun. That empty chair that Clint Eastwood talked to has its own prime time slot. Could happen to a nice Cheeto Hitler.
mercuryblues
(14,531 posts)could you not use a derogatory term about women?
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Noun
A prostitute
Often Offensive A person considered sexually promiscuous.
A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain.
intransitive verb
whored, whor·ing, whores
To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute.
To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations.
To compromise one's principles for personal gain.
Phrasal Verb: whore out To compromise one's principles for personal gain. To offer (oneself or another) for sexual activity in exchange for money or personal gain. To exploit (someone or something) crassly or unscrupulously for personal gain.
Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/whore#xKe0xxWhSvWURwKP.99
mercuryblues
(14,531 posts)Of course you had no idea that the term is used to degrade women. That is the entire purpose of the word. So what I see you doing here is validating not only shaming of woman, but also claiming a right to do so.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)mercuryblues
(14,531 posts)So that makes it fine to use the term, even knowing that it is used to degrade and dehumanize women. Even knowing that the only reason people use that term on men is an underhanded way to compare them to a female. But you know that.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)sorry for failing humankind
karmaqueen
(714 posts)People seem to get upset sometimes and I do not know why. I guess I would have never thought of the term used as pertaining to a particular sex. I think humankind will make it even with your use of the wrong word...
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)and I regret inserting myself into the dialogue at this point
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)You got flamed for something you shouldn't have. It happens. That said, I agree!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)right?
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)with the rest of DU
I am not even the one who used the term (which, btw, where I roll, is FAR more used by women themselves about MEN)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251156101
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x4082531
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x348847
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x7413211
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x8384162
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x991447
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x4327075
plus
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)And isn't that sexist
hueymahl
(2,495 posts)Everyone thinks it's all about them. Called Narcissism.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)raven mad
(4,940 posts)overly sensitive much? It's a term used for anyone who prostitutes themselves.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Let's not pretend we are in a post-sexist world.
raven mad
(4,940 posts)was in a description of Ronnie Rayguns............
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)You meant to compare him to a woman who takes money for sex, is receptive to having dirty acts done to her by virtual strangers. That's what "whore" means.
Otherwise, you would have simply described him as taking bribes.
raven mad
(4,940 posts)But I still don't think it exclusively applies to women. Wait, wait............. it does apply to Sarah Palin........... heck.......... Ok, msanthrope, you win!!
I will, however, debate that Palin is female................ or human.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,368 posts)about this OP, you need a good drink!
Seriously!
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)words do not have an inherent magical power if you don't give it to them.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)I think he is a saccharine bible thumping puff piece.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Fuck Tebow.
RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)objection to him. What's your objection?
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)to try to limit the reproductive rights of woman primarily, and that he SUCKED in the NFL, secondarily.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)He's done a couple of conservative issue ads but that's about it.
And he actually does some decent things to practice his faith instead of just being a showboat.
As fundamentalists go, he's far from the most obnoxious that there is. Take that as you will.
And I don't think he ever offered himself as a speaker. Someone probably had wishful thinking and floated his name as a speaker and the press ran with it. So both your read on the situation and your anger appear to be misplaced.
In all likelihood he's probably a registered Republican, but I'm still glad he wanted no part of Trumpapalooza.
Raster
(20,998 posts)...it has prior obligations next week and won't be attending the convention.
tenderfoot
(8,426 posts)eom
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)right wing cause he wants. He brings the stink of loser with him.