General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWas Banned on "The Discussionist" board for Defending Hillary and Minorities
I have a quite abrasive way of expressing my thoughts that can be construed as simply being REAL or "raw"... "Matter of factly"... "Non-Dog-Whistleish", maybe
But I brought that up because it's not the first time this has happened right at critical points in the political narrative. I'm talking about several political sites that seem to have the same folks that lurk there and actually stalk my ID even into Facebook(don't post there anymore)..
This banning occurred right after Hillary became "presumptive", and we all knew that the focus was gonna be on not just defending Democrats/Hillary, but "exposing" the other "presumptive"
I know there are many here who post over "there"..So when I return on July 27th, expect fireworks there because the choice is even more CLEAR.
Paladin
(28,257 posts)Hayduke Bomgarte
(1,965 posts)A sewer almost from the very beginning. Wear your ban as a badge of honor.
Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)Hayduke Bomgarte
(1,965 posts)I read that too.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)It shows what happens when you let the inmates run the asylum.
Very little real discussion actually happens over there. Just about the time a reasonable conversation gets started, someone comes along to piss in the pool and it goes downhill from there.
Hayduke Bomgarte
(1,965 posts)It became apparent, quite quickly, that discussion was not really valued there. It's pretty much agree with, or at least not counter the lunatics, or risk hides. I bailed out after maybe a month.
Rex
(65,616 posts)are past-current military with 275 years experience driving a tank and breaking down an air craft carrier. I swear they are all Little Dubyas! All that pretending to be rambo, then going out and rolling in the dirt to play militia!
Makes me laugh and laugh.
They all have this pic hanging on their wall, that time they shook his hand. Honest.
4lbs
(6,855 posts)Look at the avatars of some of the posters.
They allow the confederate flag.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)confederate flag aholes out on it, and he went running to his nanny
I started a thread on it here. pretty funny. they graciously allowed me to returned, after they "reviewed" my body of work.
ha...maybe I will, just to see how long it takes this time....a half hour the first and only day I was there
REALforever
(69 posts)Then it's a matter of how many get a chance to hide/ban your post and if they are in cohoots.. Yer gone..
I lasted maybe a month up to the Hillary nominee, and the fact that I stated that I preferred Bernie, I was trashed..
To me, it's an honor being RIGHT since 2008
Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)Bet you got 'banned' for being breaking the TOS.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)and several posters have gotten hides that were not justified.
REALforever
(69 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)This isn't our first rodeo here. Give us something tangible to back up your claims.
REALforever
(69 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)DUers don't miss a fuckin' thing.
Rex
(65,616 posts)WELCOME! You found the REAL site!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)It is! I have to admit it is fun reading the complete abandonment of reason over at DI. I won't touch Freeperville, so DI is it for that itch.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Been having a blast beating up on the assholes over at DI!
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Like you would know.
Response to Rex (Reply #34)
Gabi Hayes This message was self-deleted by its author.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)oopsaaaa
check yours
Good question really. Probably someone that found a home over there. Like minds etc..
rug
(82,333 posts)REALforever
(69 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)No doubt.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)I've got better things to do with my money than pay grovelbot to help support such tediousness.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)It's going to be interesting, to say the least.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)You manage to reduce some posters to sputtering and incoherent babbling. It's hard for many of them to respond to facts and reason with anything that resembles actual conversation.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)I simply let them do all of the work.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)you must be a master of restraint
I salute you!
pintobean
(18,101 posts)accuse the rw bigots of wearing KKK hoods.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)this place is about the same, in terms of rigorous standards wrt closely adhering to the correct version of reference to revered figures.
for example, I was judged to be out of bounds for disagreeing that Obama was the most liberal president ever
not kidding
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)I just make subject matters about anything other than who they are.
Photographer
(1,142 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)But Skinner thanks you for the clicks.
Nancyswidower
(182 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)can't wait.....
Nancyswidower
(182 posts)I'm quite certain you can wait. You have so far.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)"What's all this fuss about the band on Discussionist?"
Gothmog
(145,231 posts)Response to Gothmog (Reply #45)
Nancyswidower This message was self-deleted by its author.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Too many bigots for my taste.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)somebody here recommended that it was worth checking out
worst advice I had since buying lucent at 80.
jst kdn, carly. I got it for free, and was too stupid to dump it
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)You have enough experience with hate and discrimination.
I don't go there either, and I'm not even in a discriminated minority group. There's enough random ugliness around that I don't need to go to a place that specializes in it.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)it reminded me of Bizarro planet
me love KKK!
me hate martin luther commie!
fire BAD!
fire GOOD!
Rex
(65,616 posts)That is some great entertainment. They have such vivid imaginations over there.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)...when we were seeing a lot of phony wannabes claiming to be Vietnam vets.
The first panel showed a bunch of people sitting at a table and was captioned, "Will the real Vietnam vet please stand up?" The figures at the table included Stallone and other macho-looking men.
In the second panel the only one standing was the lone woman at the table.
Rex
(65,616 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)The ugly, racist, low information bullshit over there gets too over the top that sometimes I just have to flame out. Its actually kind of cathartic. I've tried to be civil and have intelligent discussions there, but those efforts are almost always in vane.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)You must have a good weather vain.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)edbermac
(15,939 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)While claiming HE'S in a safe space. Nice.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)ronnie624
(5,764 posts)They can't see their own racism and misogyny.
One of them posted a photo of some mean-looking rifles, and I promptly left, before someone got any on me.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)How the hell would I even have TIME for DI?
Not to mention my complete and utter aversion to that contaminated place.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Photographer
(1,142 posts)Skittles
(153,160 posts)Discussionist is Freak Republic Lite
Fuck them
pintobean
(18,101 posts)rigged in favor of those who already own it, and us.
ONLY by taking DIRECT ACTION against the individual "bad actors" can anything positive happen.
We cannot change the laws that make it legal to bribe local officials in order to continue polluting our river.
We can eliminate the corporate executive that runs the company that pollutes our river.
Only if the ones who commit the crimes against humanity that are SOP in the corporate world are afraid for their personal safety, and that of their families, would they possibly think about changing their behavior. Without any threat of consequences, WHY would they change a policy that enriches them?
But make them afraid to show their face on the street, make them afraid to have their chauffeur drive their child to their private school, make them afraid to appear anywhere in public - and they just may rethink their decisions.
The law only protects those in power.
Obeying it only enables the PtB to grab tighter control.
Ignoring it is the only way to affect change.
When the replacement shows up, eliminate them.
Rinse and repeat.
Again, I do not see any ability to change the system until there is no one willing to participate in it.
That ties into your (and Peterson's) view. There is perhaps 10-20 percent of the population that benefit by fully participating in the scam known as capitalism. I don't think it is possible to get rid of all of them. But the number of 1%ers is (obviously) lower and more vulnerable to extermination.
I think of an exchange student we hosted years ago. From a well-off family in Mexico. She had to be driven to school by an armed driver, and then locked into the wall-surrounded school to protect them from attacks by the "disgruntled masses" that did take the attack directly to the enemy.
Just imagine the little brats of America's privileged class having to be protected like that. It would be glorious.
While 1%ers are notoriously cold-hearted toward others, I have to believe they would not want their little angel's guts splattered all over the walls.
You hit them where they are weak.
Attacking them on their home turf (politics) is just asking to lose.
http://www.discussionist.com/1015806864
Advocating murder, and the murder of children should be a permanent ban. It would be here.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)And yes, it would be grounds for a PPR here. No way would it just be a timeout.