General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswould the democrats do better or worse if
Trump is dumped for another candidate in the Presidential election. Explain if you're willing.
6 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Lots better | |
0 (0%) |
|
better | |
0 (0%) |
|
slightly better | |
0 (0%) |
|
no change | |
1 (17%) |
|
slightly worse | |
1 (17%) |
|
worse | |
2 (33%) |
|
lots worse | |
1 (17%) |
|
no opinion | |
0 (0%) |
|
don't know | |
1 (17%) |
|
don't care | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
DURHAM D
(32,840 posts)with kid gloves by the media or the new bright shiny thing. There will be absolutely no vetting.
NightWatcher
(39,358 posts)Hillary can close with
Don't vote for a Party that doesn't have their shit together enough to pick a candidate who isn't insane.
ChoppinBroccoli
(3,898 posts)Lots of people who would happily vote for a ham sandwich if it had an R after its name. My "Bush-Can-Do-No-Wrong" father-in-law has told me he can't vote for Drumpf, and a lot of friends who are straight-ticket Republican voters have said the same thing. My fear is that if Drumpf is no longer the nominee, those people will all flood back to vote for WHOEVER replaces him, and this might actually turn into a tight race. They should be forced to dance with the one what brung 'em.
Control-Z
(15,684 posts)That is, after the riots have settled down.