General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeraldo: ‘All the white people’ are on ‘one side’
Last edited Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:02 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/15/geraldo-all-the-white-people-are-on-one-side-2/Appearing on Fox and Friends on Friday morning, Fox News personality Geraldo Rivera tried to pitch a thoughtful argument against racial divisions in America, but the nuances of race relations and political participation in this country failed him.
You have all the black and brown people on the one side, all the white people on the other side sadly, politics in America is becoming increasingly about race and ethnicity, he said.
Of course, he didnt mean that literally, having said just a few seconds earlier that plenty of white people will still be voting for President Barack Obama but then a moment later, he suggested those same people will support the president at a historically low rate in November.
People hate when I talk about that, but thats a reality, he concluded.
snip
I'll let this piece of turd just stand on it's own.
JustAnotherGen
(31,822 posts)And if he is still alive - why is he still talking?
And is this his super secret 'treasure' in Capone's hidden vault?
Mike Nelson
(9,954 posts)...hanging around the wrong "white people".
Erose999
(5,624 posts)FSogol
(45,484 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Gerry Rivers is an idiot douchebag whose grasp of politics is juvenile, and that's on a good day.
That's a reality.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)marmar
(77,080 posts)...... in '04 and Gore in '00?
Whites, as a national whole, have voted majority Republican in almost all the elections in my lifetime (40 years). But I suspect that if you took out the Southern states, the percentages would look a lot different.
former9thward
(32,003 posts)Yes if you took out the southern states it would look different. But if you took out the NE and the west coast it would look different too.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)people on the other, but the reality is that a significant majority whites as a group vote for Republicans and a significant majority of blacks and browns vote for Democrats. What exactly is the problem with pointing that out and discussing the reasons and consequences of that fact for US politics?
Is the outrage about him saying "all"?
otohara
(24,135 posts)living in the FOX bubble - all white & blonde, all GOP
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)And then the entire conversation would have gone full-circle into trainwreck-y sweetness
KG
(28,751 posts)OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Yeah, we care what you think Geraldo.
Initech
(100,068 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)To object to what is in the OP requires some very selective and not-useful outrage.
No Democratic presidential candidate has carried the white vote since 1964. The polarization of the two parties as the white party and the non-white party is real.
And Obama probably will get a record low percentage of the white vote relative to his overall vote total in 2012.
The Republican party really is the white party. It is true.
If one wants to pitch a fit because Geraldo said "all the..." as a conversational construction then why not pitch the same fit when people say, "Class division in America is increasing, with all the rich people on one side and all the non-rich people on the other side."
It's a normal conversation construction. George Soros is on our side and a lot of low-wage workers vote for the interests of the rich... nobody thinks that kind of conversational construction is mathematically literal.
There are gay republicans, but if I said "increasingly all the gay people are one one side and the anti-gay people on the other side" everyone would know what I meant.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Dash87
(3,220 posts)fishwax
(29,149 posts)What is his fan mail.
(That joke was in a Mad Magazine parody of Jeopardy in the late 1980s. Every time I read that Geraldo has said something stupid, it reminds me of that joke. :rofl
entanglement
(3,615 posts)However, the converse statements (Geraldo's assertions) are not true. At least, not yet.