Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
Tue Sep 13, 2016, 10:35 AM Sep 2016

How Narcissists Took Over the World

VICE


Published on Sep 12, 2016
Narcissists are suddenly everywhere. Thanks in part to Donald Trump’s media diagnosis, Narcissistic Personality Disorder has overtaken ‘psychopath’ and ‘bipolar’ to emerge as our number one label for others’ psychological failings.

As part of the Chosen Ones series, Gavin Haynes attempts to peel the pop back away from the psych, and see what’s left.

He visits the experts, quizzes the YouTube gurus, hangs out with the well-varnished girls dating on hotties-only site BeautifulPeople.com, and the support groups for the victims of the narcissists, all the while hunting for a real-life narcissist.


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Narcissists Took Over the World (Original Post) snooper2 Sep 2016 OP
Saw this on Facebook liberal N proud Sep 2016 #1
Narcissists are the only ones who want control of the world. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #2
That doesn't work so well, either. malthaussen Sep 2016 #3

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
2. Narcissists are the only ones who want control of the world.
Tue Sep 13, 2016, 10:46 AM
Sep 2016

Everyone else just goes about their business.

The first disqualifying trait for anyone to assume a position of power: Do they want it? If the answer is, "yes" then we should probably give them the side eye.

malthaussen

(17,193 posts)
3. That doesn't work so well, either.
Tue Sep 13, 2016, 11:05 AM
Sep 2016

Once upon a time, government was seen as a burden; many city-states chose their executive councils by lot, because no one wanted the job and they wanted the responsibility spread among the ruling class. That was when there were no emoluments and little glory to be had in the thankless task of government. The result really didn't differ much from what we have now, though, or what has ever been: the rulers help each other (when they aren't cutting each other's throats), and the class as a whole works to keep the rest of us down. There was this romantic idea that paying legislators and executives would free them from corruption, which didn't work all that well, either. However, the business of keeping a large and complex society running does require the full-time effort of a large caste of bureaucrats and workers, and somebody has to direct them. And government, in part, exists to put boundaries on the exploitation of the people by the ruling class, by creating and enforcing some framework of regulation (however bad), and somebody has to design the regulations. Given that the work must go on, it can only be done by those who don't want to do it, or those who do. But of course, the result is something in the middle: few who want the job want to actually do the work. A lot of folks want the glory and the prestige, though, but ironically they are undermining both by being assholes.

-- Mal

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Narcissists Took Over...