Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lindysalsagal

(20,680 posts)
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 06:38 AM Sep 2016

The devastating Newsweek article against Trump

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/donald-trump-foreign-business-deals-national-security-498081.html

Meanwhile, Trump has raised concerns in the United States among national security experts for his consistent and effusive praise for Vladimir Putin, the Russian ruler who also now controls much of Ukraine. With its founder in the White House, the Trump Organization would have an extraordinary entrée into those countries. If the company sold its brand in Russia while Trump was in the White House, the world could be faced with the astonishing site of hotels and office complexes going up in downtown Moscow with the name of the American president emblazoned in gold atop the buildings.


The dealings of the Trump Organization reach into so many countries that it is impossible to detail all the conflicts they present in a single issue of this magazine, but a Newsweek examination of the company has also found deep connections in China, Brazil, Bulgaria, Argentina, Canada, France, Germany and other countries.Never before has an American candidate for president had so many financial ties with American allies and enemies, and never before has a business posed such a threat to the United States. If Donald Trump wins this election and his company is not immediately shut down or forever severed from the Trump family, the foreign policy of the United States of America could well be for sale.


The moron Joe idiots haven't even mentioned this, at 6:37 am. Fools.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The devastating Newsweek article against Trump (Original Post) lindysalsagal Sep 2016 OP
I wondered. CNN had the author on earlier and I'm trying to go back a watch it. KewlKat Sep 2016 #1
It's not "devastating" at all. This vague reference to Trump's conflicts of interest overseas has Trust Buster Sep 2016 #2
yeah, a bit over-sold. Also, this is all really disturbing, but won't change anyone's mind Fast Walker 52 Sep 2016 #4
The article might reach low-information voters who occasionally read Newsweek. Nitram Sep 2016 #13
low information voters reading Newsweek? Stellar Sep 2016 #17
Did you miss the rest of my post? Not a very stellar comment... Nitram Sep 2016 #18
The article does list details of Trump's licensing deals in South Korea and India brush Sep 2016 #19
A lot of work went into this piece TexasProgresive Sep 2016 #3
I'm not sure that this story is all that impactful Renew Deal Sep 2016 #5
Which is so sad n/t Zing Zing Zingbah Sep 2016 #6
Know why? Volaris Sep 2016 #7
His voters don't care about this kind of stuff. cwydro Sep 2016 #8
Well, he did say he could shoot someone and not lose support. LisaL Sep 2016 #10
I know, and it boggles the mind that it's probably true. cwydro Sep 2016 #11
Trump Could Shoot A Nun CrazyCatSea Sep 2016 #14
They'd applaud his marksmanship and talk about how wonderful the 2nd Amendment is Rocknrule Sep 2016 #23
The essence of the article. kstewart33 Sep 2016 #9
it is a huge reason out of dozens, why this guy should not be allowed near the WH Fast Walker 52 Sep 2016 #20
It proves he's not the least bit patriotic about his country. Where is the RNC? lindysalsagal Sep 2016 #22
Name calling a Saudi prince over twitter duncang Sep 2016 #12
That is what Trump is really hoping for NewJeffCT Sep 2016 #15
Why Even Have A State Department CrazyCatSea Sep 2016 #16
President Trump would bring new meaning to word "kleptocrat" Fast Walker 52 Sep 2016 #21
 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
2. It's not "devastating" at all. This vague reference to Trump's conflicts of interest overseas has
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 07:14 AM
Sep 2016

been in the news for months. Newsweek offers no specifics. Newsweek wishes to sell copy. I wish they had "devastating" details but I just don't see it.

Nitram

(22,794 posts)
13. The article might reach low-information voters who occasionally read Newsweek.
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 08:31 AM
Sep 2016

In the dentistry waiting room. But, no, not "devastating." Don't people realize that over-hyping their story is counter-productive?

brush

(53,776 posts)
19. The article does list details of Trump's licensing deals in South Korea and India
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 09:37 AM
Sep 2016

A South Korea company partnering with Trump went bankrupt, multi-millions involved, a corp. officer fled to North Korea and years later returned and was jailed. Trump still recieved annual payments of 8 million from this morass. The deal had to be restructured after the jailing but Trump stiil receives payments — WTF?

I'd call that details.

The article also contrasts the Clinton and Trump foundations. No money went to any of the Clintons from their foundation. 90% of it's funds went to saving lives in developing countries (HIV drugs and such), while money flowing into the Trump foundation found its way into Trump pockets.

Plenty of details.

Huge potential conflicts of interest if Trump were president just jump off the page. And for that matter, if any of his family was still part of the business if he were president, the implications are obvious.

And I didn't even finish the article yet.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
3. A lot of work went into this piece
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 07:17 AM
Sep 2016

However in this world of tweets and factoids I can see eyes glazing before finishing the 1st paragraph. Sad but true.

Renew Deal

(81,856 posts)
5. I'm not sure that this story is all that impactful
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 07:39 AM
Sep 2016

The number of people that care about these things are small

Volaris

(10,270 posts)
7. Know why?
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 08:04 AM
Sep 2016

Trump would sell off America's reputation and goodwill around the world, and then the idjits who all voted for him would bitch that 'he isn't a real conservative.'

Except he is the best kind of conservative, because Profit before All Else. That's the disconnect in their heads that keeps making it worse...that good conservatives have Moral Standards that exceed profit margins, except when more profit is on the table (which for a really real conservative, IS ALL THE FUCKING TIME.).

Whatever, they built this monster, let it destroy them.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
11. I know, and it boggles the mind that it's probably true.
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 08:16 AM
Sep 2016

I live in a blue part of NC, but I work in a virulently red area.

I've been utterly amazed by some things I've heard from Trump supporters.

It's really frightening.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
9. The essence of the article.
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 08:11 AM
Sep 2016

The article summarizes a sample of relationships that Trump has with major business figures in several Middle East and Asian countries. Trump could use the presidency to greatly expand his business worldwide which raises the question: what will he choose to do when faced with decisions as president that affect his business relationships?

There would be continual conflicts of interest. Given Trump's record of corruption and his character, how could the country trust Trump to make decisions that benefit the country's welfare instead of his wallet?

This has huge national security concerns.

lindysalsagal

(20,680 posts)
22. It proves he's not the least bit patriotic about his country. Where is the RNC?
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 06:50 PM
Sep 2016

I thought they owned, invented, and dispensed u.s.patriotism?

If this is something the RNC can allow, gubbuy GOP.

duncang

(1,907 posts)
12. Name calling a Saudi prince over twitter
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 08:19 AM
Sep 2016

Does show what Hillary said about baiting him with a tweet..

After he went with the muslim ban idea. Alwaeed made a tweet. and his response was.

“Dopey Prince @Alwaleed_Talal wants to control our U.S. politicians with daddy’s money. Can’t do it when I get elected. #Trump2016.”


Yep, he just went to that level. That would be his signature diplomatic move. Pout, cry, and tweet something mean what a baby.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
15. That is what Trump is really hoping for
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 08:34 AM
Sep 2016

Give up the Ukraine in exchange for Trump resorts on the Black Sea. Give up on Taiwan in exchange for Trump golf courses on the South China Sea coast...

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
21. President Trump would bring new meaning to word "kleptocrat"
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 12:18 PM
Sep 2016

And yeah, just writing President Trump is scary.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The devastating Newsweek ...