Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMother Jones: A Case of Romnesia
A Case of Romnesia
Mitt Romney's long history of misremembering his past.
By David Corn
| Wed Jun. 20, 2012 3:00 AM PDT
Mitt Romney has a history problem.
It's not only that past events and stancessay, his implementation of an Obamacare-like reform in Massachusetts, or his 1994 call for "full equality" for gay and lesbiansundermine his current efforts by calling into question his political integrity. Romney often distortsor is detached fromsignificant realities of his personal past.
Voters and the media world received a glimpse of this last month when the Washington Post disclosed that Romney, while attending an elite prep school, once led a posse of schoolmates to assault a fellow student who was thought to be gay. Though the newspaper cited five sources, including several participants in the brutal episode, Romney, through a spokeswoman, claimed he had "no memory" of the mater. After the story appeared, Romney, still insisting not to recall the event, apologized for pranks that "might have gone too far." Yet his lack of recollection was tough to believe, especially given the searing memories the attack had left within others. More important, Romney's blank-out was in keeping with a pattern of selective and manipulative presentations of his past. He's not merely a flip-flopper; he's a self-revisionist. ................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/06/mitt-romney-history-problem
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1146 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mother Jones: A Case of Romnesia (Original Post)
marmar
Jun 2012
OP
FSogol
(45,580 posts)1. Accomplished liars don't remember what they said, they just think up new lies to
fit the situation. Romney is a classic liar.
NNN0LHI
(67,190 posts)2. Easy to remember the truth. Remembering a lie is much more difficult
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)3. Good stuff there
I would add Romney frequently says something like 'he changed when he met his wife.' He said this about the prep school haircut thing. Problem is Romney met Ann when Mitt was in the 4th grade:
Romney told Kimeade that his propensity for pranks and causing a bit of trouble changed when he met his future wife, Ann, while he was still in high school.
"There's no question you know I became a very different person as I meet Ann," he said.
"There's no question you know I became a very different person as I meet Ann," he said.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57431851-503544/romney-apologizes-for-hurtful-high-school-pranks/
But he met Ann in this memorable incident:
Mitt and Ann met in elementary school when he was a Cub Scout. She was riding a horse and he threw stones at her.
http://marriage.about.com/od/politics/p/mittromney.htm
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)4. One real gem in this piece is Romney's self-outing as a man of no principles.
From Corn's article:
His craven flexibility was perhaps best epitomized when he tried to explain to Kranish and Helman why during the 1994 Senate campaign he had written a letter to the Log Cabin Republicans, a pro-gay rights group, asserting a desire "to establish full equality for America's gay and lesbian citizens." He told the reporters, "well, okay, let's look at that in the context of who it's being written to." Romney, in this moment of candor, was inadvertently admitting he was an unapologetic panderer.
I knew about the other stuff in this article, including his underlying flip-flop on gay rights, but not about this explanation of it. Bizarre!