Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow. (Original Post) madamesilverspurs Jun 2012 OP
In both instances BumRushDaShow Jun 2012 #1
Extra credit question: rocktivity Jun 2012 #2
Yup. Capitalism, in order to thrive, MUST HAVE REGULATION, elleng Jun 2012 #3
chicken v. egg BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #6
So you're saying the next ten years will be awful? abelenkpe Jun 2012 #4
Awful one way or ta other I think he means. RegieRocker Jun 2012 #5

elleng

(130,903 posts)
3. Yup. Capitalism, in order to thrive, MUST HAVE REGULATION,
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 07:11 PM
Jun 2012

Without it, DOOM.

Don't want to sound unduly pessimistic, but that's how I see it. If 'they' own it all, WE lose it all.

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
6. chicken v. egg
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 07:20 PM
Jun 2012

when capital is already "thriving" it can tolerate regulation, when capital is coming up against its own limitations it can't be bothered to be regulated.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wow.