General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWTF???!!! Rachel is falling all over herself,
giving Greta Van Sustern a tongue bath right now on Rachel's show. Is Rachel afraid that she's about to lose her (Rachel's) job given that MSNBC continues its full-bore charge to become another RW source? It's beyond embarrassing to watch Rachel proclaim her undying friendship for Van Sustern with her the best thing that's happened to TV commentary since Edward R. Murrow.
If I had posted anything close to this, about RM, a month ago I would have been juried right outta here.
edit: gave up on cable nooz a while back.
putitinD
(1,551 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,379 posts)dragonlady
(3,577 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)hear. Its vital..most Trump supporters think unemployment went up under Obama!!!!
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)tirebiter
(2,536 posts)not being RW. Does this upset your preconceptions? Perhaps you oughtta have a learning moment, grasshopper.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)But thanks for your contribution which will be given all the importance it deserves.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)Cha
(297,229 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)putitinD
(1,551 posts)Because if she showed only clips of Van Susteren being RW, it'd take all fucking year.
There's only so much time in a Rachel Maddow Show segment.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...you should understand that most of us out here can maintain those and still disagree, still maintain our integrity.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)when she was first hired by DT. Matthews gave KC the best hour of smooshing ever right b4 the debate. Yeah, they cried on TV as the results came in, but this kind of stuff is one more reason, of about 20, why we lost.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)bdamomma
(63,849 posts)are they going right wing and going to bow down to this POS (tRump). Greta Van Sustern????? WTF? Are we are going full throttle on propaganda??
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)True_Blue
(3,063 posts)RKP5637
(67,108 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Throd 2.0
(62 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Van S. is a friend. I don't watch Rachel to hear about her friends - I watch her for some intelligent analysis. When she starts letting friendship color that it detracts from her value as an analyst and bothers me.
still_one
(92,190 posts)that he lied about "his sources in the FBI telling him that an indictment was pending against the Clinton Foundation"
She embarrassed herself with that one also.
I am so glad I no longer receive CNN, MSNBC, fox, and CNBC
napi21
(45,806 posts)Hack. I didn't always agree with there but she's a smart cookie. I think Rachel values her as aa friend along with some of the other females who've managed to hit the big time. I think that's what you're seeing in Rachel's enthusiasm. Girls have to stick together ya know.
I'm willing to give her a chance. do want to know if Chuck Todd is going somewhere? Can only run one show a 6 o'clock,
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)I believe. There's been sort of a vacuum between 6 and 7 when Tweety comes on.
napi21
(45,806 posts)Smirconish on. Most of the time that slot does seem to be a bit of a fill in, so I guess it will be gone by Monday.
liberal from boston
(856 posts)I read that Greta will have the 6 PM slot replacing With All Due Respect program.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)So be it
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)I'm not a fan and have thought of her as right wing, but the rest of Rachel's show tonight was great. I am willing to see what happens if Greta doesn't have to answer to the right wing ding-dongs at Fox. I really don't expect much, but I am willing to wait and see before I bash her too much.
BTW, I hope you watched the first part of Rachel's show about The National Enquirer's headlines the last few weeks before the election and now after the election. The lies they told were spectacular and all for the benefit of Trump, not necessarily because they don't like Hillary. Makes me think they'd have made up equally terrible headlines about any Dem candidate. We are going to have to fight this kind of stuff... and get really GOOD at it.
I've recently tried to stick to C-Span for info or PBS, but I do generally like Rachel's show most of the time.
bocaharv
(16 posts)Believe it or not,the ceo of that rag is named PECKER & he & trumpsky are pals.It was one of the few newspapers to endorse him.My question is .....why don't the Clintons sue like trumpsky who sues everybody except , of course, the women who accused him of sexual depravities who he threatened to sue post election.
putitinD
(1,551 posts)is pretty much already a Drumpf supporter. and a Hillary hater.
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)it might have swayed those on the fence, and there actually were some moderate Republicans considering voting against Trump. I think these attacks were planned and coordinated. Look at the short time between the WikiLeaks leak and when stories came out about #pizzagate and Podesta and his brother kidnapping Madeline McCann... oh, and spirit eating for god's sake. There's too much coincidence for me, but I'm a believer when it comes to Republicans and what they're capable of with their dirty tricks.
putitinD
(1,551 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)she and her hubby are Scientologists.
So they're weirdos, on top of everything else.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)radical noodle
(8,000 posts)but ewwwwwwwwwww
salin
(48,955 posts)Maybe that is how she was able to transform from CNN legal analyst to Fox News - you know they learn how to push down all reactions and go into that glazey stone-faced state.
She was decent on CNN - but that was a looong time ago.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)More hard hitting and liberal now. Perhaps more effective. And CNN is on every hotel TV and airport. The masses are seeing it and they are out to get trump for sure.
orleans
(34,051 posts)Wabbajack_
(1,300 posts)Fat chance, she's gonna praise em.
Fuck corporate news
Skittles
(153,160 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)MFM008
(19,808 posts)But I'm not watching fox shills.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)Rachel's show gets, by far, the highest ratings of any show on MSNBC. She's not going anywhere.
If Rachel believes VS is legit, I'm ready to give her a chance. IMHO, she's not a Fox babe. But let's see before launching slings and arrows at VS.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)after watching her on Fux for the past 14 years? She's another RW shill, added to turn MSNBC from a vaguely left-of-center network into Fux lite. Scew her.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)Trash word: VS
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)I'm willing to give her a chance. No harm in that.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)GVS was on CNN, then FOX, never did particularly well ratings-wise at either but still gets hired at MSNBC.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Seems like a lot of these people are friends.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)regardless of your convictions.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Having said that, I don't care for Van Sustren. But I have more important things to occupy my thoughts. And for that, I am grateful.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)from distracting your beautiful mind from obviously more important things. Rest assured that all efforts wil be made to see that it doesn't happen again.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)But thanks for the reminder of why I should not watch these corporate, right wing sell-outs. Always appreciated.