Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cattledog

(5,914 posts)
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 06:29 PM Jan 2017

The Case Against Sugar

Taubes’s writing is both inflammatory and copiously researched. It is also well timed. In September, a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, uncovered documents showing that Big Sugar paid three Harvard scientists in the 1960s to play down the connection between sugar and heart disease and instead point the finger at saturated fat. Coca-Cola and candy makers made similar headlines for their forays into nutrition science, funding studies that discounted the link between sugar and obesity.

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/books/review/case-against-sugar-gary-taubes.html?hpw&rref=books&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well&_r=0

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Case Against Sugar (Original Post) Cattledog Jan 2017 OP
Big Sugar? HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #1
 

HoneyBadger

(2,297 posts)
1. Big Sugar?
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 06:38 PM
Jan 2017

I take statins for cholesterol. My doc was telling me that there is new research coming, that shows that sugar is responsible for more heart attacks than fat.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Case Against Sugar