Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,956 posts)
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 01:15 AM Jan 2017

Trump wants a much bigger Navy

President-elect Donald Trump has vowed to maintain a naval fleet of 350 ships as part of an historic buildup of the U.S. military, but his ambitions come with a stiff price tag.

“Our Navy is the smallest it's been since World War I,” he said during a campaign stop last October in the Philadelphia Navy Yard. “My plan will build the 350 ship Navy we need. This will be the largest effort at rebuilding our military since Ronald Reagan, and it will require a truly national effort.”

The Navy on average has spent $15.9 billion annually on ship building over the past three decades, according to a new report by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). In order to meet the Republican president-elect’s goal, the navy shipbuilding account would have to be boosted to $25 billion a year, 60 percent higher than the historical average.

That will mean having to find a way to lift the budget cap on defense spending by about $9 billion a year.
Trump is far from alone in his ambitions for expanding the U.S. fleet to counter Russia, China, Iran and other global adversaries. Last month, the Navy released a new force structure assessment – a blueprint for the future -- which calls for building a fleet of 355 ships. That is in sharp contrast to a previous long-term goal of 308 ships. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/trump-wants-a-much-bigger-navy-heres-how-much-itll-cost/ar-BBxWzbO?li=BBnbfcN&ocid=edgsp

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump wants a much bigger Navy (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2017 OP
And he'll make the whales pay for it? uppityperson Jan 2017 #1
Good one Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2017 #2
And we are using WWI as our basis? RB TexLa Jan 2017 #3
We're down on tanks and mortars from WWII, too. TreasonousBastard Jan 2017 #4
Yeah, it's an illogical take on military power/strength. xor Jan 2017 #5
A co-worker tells this story his friend told him.. sarah FAILIN Jan 2017 #6
That's not as many as little Marco wants hibbing Jan 2017 #7
They'll need more ships HassleCat Jan 2017 #8
He's decided that he looks really snazzy in an Admiral's uniform. Buns_of_Fire Jan 2017 #9
Well the flight suit, Mendocino Jan 2017 #13
Give him 200 navy kayaks and tell him he done good... Thor_MN Jan 2017 #10
Yes more boondoggle Mendocino Jan 2017 #11
The Calvary is seriously lacking horses too. BSdetect Jan 2017 #12
 

RB TexLa

(17,003 posts)
3. And we are using WWI as our basis?
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 02:15 AM
Jan 2017

I would bet our cavalry is way down from WWI numbers as well. We need more horses or we aren't prepared to fight WWI.

I dare to think how much fewer brewster body shields we have now then we did in WWI!!

xor

(1,204 posts)
5. Yeah, it's an illogical take on military power/strength.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 02:42 AM
Jan 2017

It seems to work with people who don't like to think much though.

sarah FAILIN

(2,857 posts)
6. A co-worker tells this story his friend told him..
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 02:51 AM
Jan 2017

Yes, I know that is 3rd hand, but...

The story goes that when gas prices were so high, the friends Navy ship had to just stop. Drop anchor and stop because they were out of fuel and could not afford more. My point is that they couldn't afford fuel to keep that ship moving then they sure can't afford to buy more ships.


The only people to benefit from this will be the defense contractors.

hibbing

(10,098 posts)
7. That's not as many as little Marco wants
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 03:26 AM
Jan 2017

I remember in one of the debates he must have said 700 ship navy about thirty times.
And we all know how these types of things work, something for all these ships is prodced in almost every state,so the majority of Congress votes for this spending regardless of party.

Peace

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
8. They'll need more ships
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 03:52 AM
Jan 2017

We can't seem to develop weapons that work, so we have to buy more of them. Makes sense to me.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,175 posts)
9. He's decided that he looks really snazzy in an Admiral's uniform.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 10:43 AM
Jan 2017

After Dukakis-in-a-tank, he scratched off the Army.
After Shit-fer-Brains showed off his sweat-sock-padding in his aviator outfit, he said "no" to the Air Force.
He can't squeeze his pasty body into anything a Marine might wear.

But the Navy, ah, that's the ticket! Lots of white space on those uniforms for medals, ribbons, sashes, gold braid (LOTS of gold braid!)... Standing at the bow of the ship, wind blowing his hair off, sinking everything Carnival puts in the water...

Mendocino

(7,488 posts)
13. Well the flight suit,
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 11:37 AM
Jan 2017

mission accomplished stunt was aboard a Navy Carrier. But I can see him in Navy whites, covered with medals, saber carrying, looking like something out of Gilbert and Sullivan. "I'M THE KING OF THE WORLD"

Mendocino

(7,488 posts)
11. Yes more boondoggle
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 11:25 AM
Jan 2017

like littoral ships and the F-35, good for the defense contractors, bad for everyone else.

BSdetect

(8,998 posts)
12. The Calvary is seriously lacking horses too.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 11:27 AM
Jan 2017

OMG, Romney stepped on that landmine with O during a debate.

Yes drumph, its all a matter of numbers.

You can bet he has an interest in shipbuilders.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump wants a much bigger...