Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 08:59 PM Jan 2017

Unless the party gets rid of the "Automation deniers"

how do they expect to get anywhere with the working class who knows the jobs are not coming back.

Elon Musk: Robots will take your jobs, government will have to pay your wage

Computers, intelligent machines, and robots seem like the workforce of the future. And as more and more jobs are replaced by technology, people will have less work to do and ultimately will be sustained by payments from the government, predicts Elon Musk, the iconic Silicon Valley futurist who is the founder and CEO of SolarCity, Tesla, and SpaceX.

According to Musk, there really won't be any other options.

"There is a pretty good chance we end up with a universal basic income, or something like that, due to automation," says Musk to CNBC. "Yeah, I am not sure what else one would do. I think that is what would happen."

Read More:

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/04/elon-musk-robots-will-take-your-jobs-government-will-have-to-pay-your-wage.html

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Unless the party gets rid of the "Automation deniers" (Original Post) CK_John Jan 2017 OP
There will always be work for humans to do. Yavin4 Jan 2017 #1
For the umpteenth time: Computerization and Automation are completely different phenomena. DetlefK Jan 2017 #4
As the rust belt showed us, the work is changing faster than some can learn it. LonePirate Jan 2017 #6
And they vote for the party aligned with the premise of the State of Nature and Survival of Fittest. TheBlackAdder Jan 2017 #16
I remember the silly statement, Wiseman32218 Jan 2017 #2
our paperless system in our office Horse with no Name Jan 2017 #3
To cut down on my consumption I get all bills electronically Wiseman32218 Jan 2017 #10
I heard that the youngest children today will probably never Ilsa Jan 2017 #5
It doesn't matter sarah FAILIN Jan 2017 #7
What does that even mean? OrwellwasRight Jan 2017 #11
That's the way reps are around here sarah FAILIN Jan 2017 #20
I remember the 1960's TubbersUK Jan 2017 #8
That's because in the 1960's the assumption was OrwellwasRight Jan 2017 #12
Yes n/t TubbersUK Jan 2017 #13
When conservatives administer a universal basic income (UBI) teach1st Jan 2017 #9
I do think we'll have to move towards UBI at some point TexasBushwhacker Jan 2017 #17
Would that be the working class that just voted for Trump promising to bring jobs back? mythology Jan 2017 #14
And conservative Xians implore them to have as many babies as the woman can bear... Crash2Parties Jan 2017 #15
We may need a version of the CCC. KamaAina Jan 2017 #18
Shrinking government. Fighting for buggy whip jobs. Republicans cause the problems. gulliver Jan 2017 #19
What ever will become of the lowly serf without the benevolent Lord of the Manor? Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2017 #21

Yavin4

(35,438 posts)
1. There will always be work for humans to do.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 09:03 PM
Jan 2017

I've witnessed the introduction of computers into the workplace, and it increased my workload by leaps and bounds.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
4. For the umpteenth time: Computerization and Automation are completely different phenomena.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 09:13 PM
Jan 2017

A computer is a tool. It doesn't work without a human.

A robot is no tool. A robot can work without a human and is a worker on its own.

And when a company has the choice between a human worker (who needs salary, breaks, toilets, light, clean air, workplace-safety-measures, anti-suicide-nets on the roofs...) and a robotic worker (who needs none of those), whom do they hire?

Wiseman32218

(291 posts)
10. To cut down on my consumption I get all bills electronically
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 09:26 PM
Jan 2017

but that does not stop everything. Even my credit union sends me garbage I do not need. I just hope their encryption does not allow my personal info to be hacked by the commies like Putin.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
5. I heard that the youngest children today will probably never
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 09:16 PM
Jan 2017

Learn to drive a car. Automobiles will all be automated now that safety is so much better. How many million truck drivers, taxi drivers, etc, will that put out of work? What will people learn to do to earn a living?

sarah FAILIN

(2,857 posts)
7. It doesn't matter
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 09:20 PM
Jan 2017

They will blame dems and draw their government checks for whatever support they're getting.

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
11. What does that even mean?
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 09:52 PM
Jan 2017

The government does not provide an adequate living for people who are out of work. In many states, if you are single with no dependents, you are not even eligible for welfare (Texas, e.g.). But keep mocking the not-so-well-off. That will get them to vote Democratic.

sarah FAILIN

(2,857 posts)
20. That's the way reps are around here
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 12:06 AM
Jan 2017

We are a very poor state. 75% of the students get free lunch which is a good indicator of the poverty level. Lots of people are on disability for their "nerves" and food stamps to feed the kids, but they are not interested in democrats who are too "liberal" for their tastes and give too much taxpayer money away (ignoring that they are themselves on government assistance)... I've heard this time after time from people that would rather shoot their own foot off than vote dem. My county had 3,730 votes for Hilary and 32,734 votes for Trump. They are not interested in going democrat when they have more fun sitting around griping about them.

Adding that no matter what really causes them to be out of work, it will be a dems fault.

TubbersUK

(1,439 posts)
8. I remember the 1960's
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 09:21 PM
Jan 2017

and reading how the white heat of technology would soon turn us into a leisure society.

Every one I know is now working longer and harder than ever.

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
12. That's because in the 1960's the assumption was
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 09:54 PM
Jan 2017

that as you became more productive and able to produce the same in less time, you'd keep your same pay and just work less. Thus, more leisure.

Instead, the ownership class has gleaned virtually 100% of the benefits of increased productivity, so people have to worker harder just to stay in place economically.

teach1st

(5,935 posts)
9. When conservatives administer a universal basic income (UBI)
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 09:22 PM
Jan 2017

From Forbes, 6/4/16

Which brings us to the calculation of how we can indeed afford a UBI. Charles Murray is in the WSJ today:

In my version, every American citizen age 21 and older would get a $13,000 annual grant deposited electronically into a bank account in monthly installments. Three thousand dollars must be used for health insurance (a complicated provision I won’t try to explain here), leaving every adult with $10,000 in disposable annual income for the rest of their lives.

...

The UBI is to be financed by getting rid of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, Supplemental Security Income, housing subsidies, welfare for single women and every other kind of welfare and social-services program, as well as agricultural subsidies and corporate welfare. As of 2014, the annual cost of a UBI would have been about $200 billion cheaper than the current system. By 2020, it would be nearly a trillion dollars cheaper.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,185 posts)
17. I do think we'll have to move towards UBI at some point
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 10:43 PM
Jan 2017

But I don't think that $833 per month (10K/12) would be enough to support a disabled or elderly person who can't work at all, unless they get assistance for food and housing.

Currently, the US is spending almost $10K per person (including children and young adults under 21), so charging each adult $3K for health insurance won't begin to cover it.

It's no surprise that Murray is trying to get by on the cheap. I believe in UBI and universal healthcare, but even with people working some to supplement that basic income, UBI will be more expensive or programs like food and housing assistance will still have to exist.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
14. Would that be the working class that just voted for Trump promising to bring jobs back?
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 10:10 PM
Jan 2017

Yes automation is coming. But I suspect much like previous paradigm altering technologies, we will eventually adapt to this one. Whether it's through a universal basic income or through new jobs that we haven't yet thought of, the only constant is that change is inevitable.

But I'm not sure using Elon Musk is the best person to go to for perfect vision about humanity. He also believes that it's a billion to one chance that we are living in reality as opposed to a simulation.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
18. We may need a version of the CCC.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 11:06 PM
Jan 2017

Elon is already working on colonizing Mars. Closer to home, there's lots of space on the sea.

gulliver

(13,180 posts)
19. Shrinking government. Fighting for buggy whip jobs. Republicans cause the problems.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 11:24 PM
Jan 2017

True, the time may come when there is no valuable work for humans to do. But that's not now. Look around at all the things we could be doing. Flint and other cities could be getting new water pipes. We could be replacing power plants with solar. We could be extending high speed Internet to everyone everywhere in the country. We could be cleaning up, beautifying, restoring.

Why can't we? Because we don't put human-centricity and virtuous living first. We are simply insane, and Republicans are by far the worst.

We let abstractions like capitalism, socialism, markets, small government, sacrifice, and hard work screw up our thinking. We fetishize these and other ideas that we barely understand, each choosing their own favorite corner of life to over-emphasize. The result is deadlock, a systemic inability to cooperate writ large. Again, it's just crazy.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
21. What ever will become of the lowly serf without the benevolent Lord of the Manor?
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 04:33 AM
Jan 2017

Why is this the first social and economic change that society won't be able to adapt to?

Farm enclosure put more people out of work that anything else in history, 250 years ago, probably never to be surpassed. Somehow the world didn't end in 1800.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Unless the party gets rid...