Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 07:34 PM Jun 2012

Have you noticed the conspicuous absence of TORT REFORM as a GOP talking point this election?

Is it just my imagination, or have you noticed it, too?

Democrats have always been at a disadvantage when it comes to big funding for their campaigns, but there have been two traditional sources of funding:

1. Labor Unions, and
2. Tort Lawyers.

Historically, Republicans have gone after them both, big time. Look at how much time Bush spent talking about TORT REFORM in the 2000 and 2004 elections, and the political capital they expended trying to limit medical malpractice awards, and corporate liability for corporate malfeasance. They also made it a huge part of the healthcare reform fight in 2009.

And now? *CRICKETS*
Why?

I think they realized they may have awakened a sleeping giant. You can go after the Labor Unions easily enough. And what can they do to fight back? Protest? Go on strike? All that does is give the TV news cameramen their stereotypical MONEY SHOT of some big tough guys with beer bellies looking threatening, so they can paint them as 'union thugs.' Sure they might actually be undercover cops, but who cares about that. And let's face it, Richard Trumka doesn't exactly have a photogenic mug when it comes to the Sunday Morning talk shows. And then there's public sector unions....come on...going after them is like shooting fish in a barrel. The GOP spin doctors don't even have to work up a sweat to turn public opinion against public sector unions. They just have to fall back on 50 years of continuous propaganda about lazy, inefficient government workers that's (amazingly) been propagated by BOTH PARTIES.



But lawyers...that's a different thing entirely. Sure everybody hates them, but if you think they can't COME AFTER YOU you're very much mistaken.


Case in point: How is Obama trying to stop the voter purge in Florida? Something that Al Gore fought by essentially throwing himself into a helpless fetal position on the floor (aka-working within Florida voting laws)? Obama gets holder to threaten LAWSUITS. Not just against Scott, or the Florida Secretary of State, but potentially against the individual riding officers. Okay...so political dirty tricks are fun, but not every one of those officers can afford a $5000 fine and 2 years in prison. Maybe Scott can afford a fine, but not EVERYONE can. So, this time, the individual riding officers are not going along with the plan!


Case in point: How is Obama threatening to bring down Karl Roves Crossroads SuperPAC? A LAWSUIT.


The Republicans are toning down their rhetoric against lawyers this time around, but I have a feeling it's too late. The lawyers are smart enough to know that the GOP is beholden to big business, and big business will demand that they bring in TORT REFORM to limit their liability if they get elected. Well, you can't threaten a lawyer's livelihood and not expect him/her to fight back.

They may have stopped the TORT REFORM rhetoric, but the lawyers have clearly not forgotten about it. To quote Isoroku Yamamoto: "I fear all we have done is awaken a sleeping giant, and filled him with a terrible resolve."

I know everybody hates lawyers, but it may be LAWYERS who ultimately clean up the mess that is our political process.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
3. Everybody hates lawyers until you need one to sue the company that gave your kid leukemia by
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:54 PM
Jun 2012

dumping plastic softeners into the water table, or the plastic surgeon who cut out your lung when he was supposed to remove your kidney. It's an honorable profession. It's just that most of them have a habit of charging too much. (Alas, I have a feeling LEGAL ZOOM dot COM will take care of that, and most of the money that respectable lawyers used to get will end up being inherited by the Kardasians.)

longship

(40,416 posts)
2. No trial lawyers running for POTUS?
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 08:42 PM
Jun 2012

They've all but defenestrated John Edwards. So the trial lawyer enemy won't play.

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
4. Nevertheless, I now think it's an extreme plus that Obama started his career as a civil liberties
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:58 PM
Jun 2012

lawyer. His enemies know how to fight dirty with push polls and swiftboats, but at some point in his career he learned how to fight dirty with a LAW BOOK.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
5. They still have a hard-on for tort reform...
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:03 PM
Jun 2012

and always will.

N.C. politics could be making a hard right

North Carolina next January may be looking at the first complete Republican control of state government since 1898, with the GOP in charge of the legislature, the governor’s office and the high courts.

Which is just fine with Grover Norquist, one of nation’s leading conservative strategists, who was in Raleigh last week to – among other things – meet with Republican leaders to think big thoughts about what GOPGOV might look like.

“With a Republican governor and a Republican legislature, North Carolina will probably move into one of the top tier innovative states,” Norquist said in an interview.

Thwarting lawsuits

With no Democratic governor to deal with, he also sees a Republican legislature taking further steps toward tort reform or laws making it harder for individuals to sue companies. It is not lost on Norquist that in addition to policy goals, a move to cripple public employee groups and hamper trial lawyers also would strike a major blow to the state Democratic Party’s efforts to ever mount a political comeback in North Carolina.


Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/06/17/2141994/nc-could-be-headed-toward-hard.html#storylink=cpy

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
6. Yikes. So, all that's left is for North Carolina to repeal the Minimum Wage and the
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:21 PM
Jun 2012

child labor laws, and then tell the slaves they've got to start making the bricks for the Pyramids without straw under penalty of chopping off their hands.

No worker's rights
No minimum wage
No safety regulations, and
No ability to sue a company that has wronged you.

According to conservative philosophy the place will be a PARADISE in NO TIME!

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
7. Oh yeah, and with fracking sites 15 miles away from a nuclear power plant.
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 12:53 PM
Jun 2012

PARADISE! I think the plan is to "study" fracking for two years before issuing permits, which is too long for asshole Republican Bob Rucho, who is just itchin' to drill, baby, drill NOW. The USGS estimates only a 12-day nationwide supply of natural gas, and a 5-year NC supply, so Republican claims of "energy independence" are total bullshit. Of course, that won't stop the dumbasses from supporting it. And the jobs promised won't go to North Carolinians, but to highly skilled outsiders. Of course, the dumbasses won't believe that, and they'll still support fracking. If only Republicans and their staffers would take some time from their lobbyist-boning activities to SERIOUSLY study the dangers of fracking.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Have you noticed the cons...