Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,975 posts)
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 11:37 AM Jan 2017

Experts: Women's March 3 Times the Size of Trump Inauguration (Daily Beast)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/01/22/experts-women-s-march-3-times-the-size-of-trump-inauguration.html


The women’s march in Washington, D.C. on Saturday drew triple the number of people who attended President Donald Trump’s inauguration the day before, according to crowd experts Marcel Altenburg and Keith Still from Metropolitan University in the U.K. They estimate that, based on available photos and videos, around 160,000 people were on the National Mall during the inauguration. Altenburg and Still added that the women’s march drew 470,000 people on the Mall.

-snip-
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Experts: Women's March 3 Times the Size of Trump Inauguration (Daily Beast) (Original Post) highplainsdem Jan 2017 OP
Size matters BIGLY to Snowflake underpants Jan 2017 #1
Yeah well.. Else You Are Mad Jan 2017 #2
"Three times? That's not acceptable. Spicer, make my number ten times." dalton99a Jan 2017 #3
The problem with that estimate is that it didn't count all the people who couldn't get to the Mall! femmocrat Jan 2017 #4
and that was only washington... Takket Jan 2017 #5
You forgot Russia! Barack_America Jan 2017 #7
okay, so add Putin and his cronies having a vodka party to Friday's total ;) Takket Jan 2017 #8
And just think how many of those women were pregnant! Barack_America Jan 2017 #6
There were tales going through the crowd that a woman went into labor, so +1. femmocrat Jan 2017 #9

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
2. Yeah well..
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 11:41 AM
Jan 2017

There are alternative facts that prove that only a handful of women protested around the world!!!! /s



You know that it is killing Trump inside that the women's march was more popular than him! And, I love that fact. Let's not slow down!

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
4. The problem with that estimate is that it didn't count all the people who couldn't get to the Mall!
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 11:48 AM
Jan 2017

We were stuck in some area off Independence Ave. behind the Smithsonian with hundreds of thousands who were gridlocked. There were speakers and a jumbo-tron but all we could see were the backs of people's heads. There was no way to get through because of the mobs. It would be cool if there were drone photos of the side areas as well as the Mall. The Metro was packed like sardines because some stations would close temporarily due to the crowds. It was just wall-to-wall people.

Also... It wasn't about having a competition with drumpf about who could bring out the larger crowds, although I am happy that this annoys him.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
6. And just think how many of those women were pregnant!
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 11:50 AM
Jan 2017

So (by their logic) millions of people marched in DC alone yesterday.

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
9. There were tales going through the crowd that a woman went into labor, so +1.
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 02:18 PM
Jan 2017

Don't know if it was true, but we did see an ambulance on or near Independence Ave. The driver was bellowing, "MOVE" at the crowd, who were trying to get out of the way, but there was no where to move!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Experts: Women's March 3 ...