Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(52,205 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 01:00 PM Jan 2017

donnie hands china a major unearned victory

while we're obsessing about donnie's overly friendly relationship with america's rival russia, donnie just withdraw from the tpp. handing a major victory to our other major rival, china.

whatever its flaws, the tpp was a geopolitical coup, forging a trade alliance with pacific countries except china, largely on our terms rather than on china's terms.

in our absence, china will be free to fill the void and form a trade alliance with the same countries except us, this time on their terms.


awesome job, donnie!

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
donnie hands china a major unearned victory (Original Post) unblock Jan 2017 OP
Yup. Now China will set standards for environmental and labor rights throughout Asia. Wheeeeeee! DanTex Jan 2017 #1
more pollution, more cheap labor, more long hours, and more cheap products unblock Jan 2017 #2
You need to have a look at what China is doing re climate change malaise Jan 2017 #34
THESE standards. yallerdawg Jan 2017 #3
When he is shown why TPP can make him rich, he will change his position. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2017 #4
*he* can make plenty of money off a china-led trade deal unblock Jan 2017 #5
When your modus operandi is to... Jacob Boehme Jan 2017 #6
Nixing the TPP is what a lot of Democrats have been pushing for. It's a mistake, but surprised they Hoyt Jan 2017 #7
President Obama was looking out for us. Cha Jan 2017 #18
Exactly, Cha. He got nothing but grief for it too which is totally unfair. Hoyt Jan 2017 #33
Major Grief.. I trusted him. Cha Jan 2017 #35
This was a victory for the American people Jim Lane Jan 2017 #8
so why not renegotiate it like he says he'll do with nafta? unblock Jan 2017 #10
It's hard to renegotiate a deal among twelve countries. Jim Lane Jan 2017 #22
i agree that it's all way too complicated for donnie to handle. unblock Jan 2017 #27
I'm confused - are we for it or against it? jmg257 Jan 2017 #9
i think either of them would have renegotiated it. unblock Jan 2017 #11
Ah gotcha - thanks! nt jmg257 Jan 2017 #12
Clinton was only against it due to fun n serious Jan 2017 #19
That wasn't the only reason and in fact wasn't a credible one. Jim Lane Jan 2017 #32
The TPP allowed for corporate super-sovereignty. WinkyDink Jan 2017 #13
you figure china's going to make things better? unblock Jan 2017 #14
"renegotiation would have made sense": Did Pres. Obama know this? WinkyDink Jan 2017 #43
Hang on, I'll ask unblock Jan 2017 #45
he says given the pushback, if he had another 4 years, yeah, he would have renegotiated it. unblock Jan 2017 #46
Just like every trade deal since 1959 does. I think there are like 3000 agreements with the "Super Hoyt Jan 2017 #37
Mixed bag. Xolodno Jan 2017 #15
I really don't think people know what this TPP is really all about. We are giving away our power. TrekLuver Jan 2017 #16
Yep. We are losing our GLOBAL place in the world. fun n serious Jan 2017 #21
We need to get a message out to the world...toe the line for 4 years and we'll be back...this TrekLuver Jan 2017 #28
In my opinion... fun n serious Jan 2017 #17
I agree Cha Jan 2017 #20
It's a sad day when Populism and anger fun n serious Jan 2017 #24
hate, ignorance, anger trumped everything Cha Jan 2017 #26
Exactly. Middle class paying factory jobs for people with a HS education or less are a Yavin4 Jan 2017 #23
Nor do we want to. fun n serious Jan 2017 #25
To borrow an overused word, eh? Cha Jan 2017 #30
OMG. LOL fun n serious Jan 2017 #39
Of course I borrowed it from Sherman! Cha Jan 2017 #40
This TrekLuver Jan 2017 #29
Hillary agreed with Bernie. Did she also mislead a lot of people? Jim Lane Jan 2017 #31
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #38
I agree. fun n serious Jan 2017 #42
I am with you ... we ceded all the power in the region to china etherealtruth Jan 2017 #36
Frikken Republicans are such losers Achilleaze Jan 2017 #41
Delightful!...nt SidDithers Jan 2017 #44

unblock

(52,205 posts)
2. more pollution, more cheap labor, more long hours, and more cheap products
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 01:04 PM
Jan 2017

forcing us to keep our own labor prices even lower.

race to the bottom!

malaise

(268,964 posts)
34. You need to have a look at what China is doing re climate change
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:46 PM
Jan 2017

China cannot force the United States to keep your labor prices low.
It was done for corporate profit - most of it American - and as a way to destroy Trade Unions and workers rights. Blame your own leaders who sold out for money.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
4. When he is shown why TPP can make him rich, he will change his position.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 01:04 PM
Jan 2017

I have predicted for a long time if given the chance he would sign it. I hope I am wrong, but the right argument has not been made to him yet.

Just like when he is shown how buying stock in war machine companies then starting a war is profitable, he will do that soon

unblock

(52,205 posts)
5. *he* can make plenty of money off a china-led trade deal
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 01:11 PM
Jan 2017

because *he* can build hotels anywhere in the world.

he's happy to have asian billionaires stay at trump-branded hotels throughout the pacific.

what does he want with any worker protections or pollution standards or any other tpp terms that might favor workers or america?

Jacob Boehme

(789 posts)
6. When your modus operandi is to...
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 01:11 PM
Jan 2017

.... fuck up everything you touch, there can only be ONE outcome to everything you touch.

Thus we now have: Donald J. Trump: Failure extraordinaire

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
7. Nixing the TPP is what a lot of Democrats have been pushing for. It's a mistake, but surprised they
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 01:19 PM
Jan 2017

aren't thanking Trump.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
8. This was a victory for the American people
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 05:42 PM
Jan 2017

Trump does not possess reverse infallibility. Both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders agreed that the TPP as finalized was a bad idea. Even if Trump had his own (probably xenophobic) reasons for taking the action they recommended, it was still the right thing to do.

TPP did not set trade "largely on our terms" except in the sense that "our" government agreed to the terms. It was largely on the terms favorable to big business and unfavorable for consumers, unions, sick people, the environment, and freedom of information.

unblock

(52,205 posts)
10. so why not renegotiate it like he says he'll do with nafta?
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 05:52 PM
Jan 2017

why abdicate any influence in this area?

i'm not saying it was perfect, i'm not even saying it was good. all i'm saying is that handing the negotiations over to china will be worse.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
22. It's hard to renegotiate a deal among twelve countries.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:15 PM
Jan 2017

The TPP negotiations ran from 2008 to 2015, with twelve nations participating. The agreement they reached is more than 5,000 pages long.

Suppose the U.S. asks for a change in one particular. That change might benefit the U.S. but work to Japan's disadvantage. Japan agrees to go along with it anyway, provided that Japan is compensated by a change elsewhere. Fine, except that the the change elsewhere is objected to by both Malaysia and Vietnam. And so on.

I never bought this scaremongering about China. Without the TPP, the United States can continue to set its own laws, subject of course to the international agreements that are already in effect.

unblock

(52,205 posts)
27. i agree that it's all way too complicated for donnie to handle.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:20 PM
Jan 2017

i'm sure that's why he prefers one-on-one negotiations.


but now there will be a china-led pacific trade deal without us, and it will lead to cheaper labor and lax pollution laws to compete with america labor. this will hamper our ability to negotiate one-on-one *and* it will provide downward pressure on american labor prices.


abdicating it to china is roughly equivalent to repealing obamacare without giving any thought to a replacement.

fix it, don't just walk away from it.

unblock

(52,205 posts)
11. i think either of them would have renegotiated it.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 05:53 PM
Jan 2017

backing out and abdicating to china is what i have a problem with.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
32. That wasn't the only reason and in fact wasn't a credible one.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:32 PM
Jan 2017

She also mentioned her belief that the agreement was "putting the interests of drug companies ahead of patients and consumers."

As to currency manipulation, "renegotiate" is something of a misnomer, because the U.S. never even proposed the inclusion of currency manipulation in the TPP. It was and is a concern of U.S. policymakers, but they knew from the start that there was zero chance of reaching agreement on that score. That's one reason that "in the four years Clinton was secretary of state she never once brought up currency manipulation as something that should be tackled under the auspices of the TPP." https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/10/08/is-hillary-clinton-right-about-the-trans-pacific-partnership

unblock

(52,205 posts)
14. you figure china's going to make things better?
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 05:58 PM
Jan 2017

renegotiation would have made sense, not that i would trust donnie to do it competently.

but abdicating and handing it all over to china will not help matters.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
37. Just like every trade deal since 1959 does. I think there are like 3000 agreements with the "Super
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:59 PM
Jan 2017

Sovereignty" dispute clause in it. And almost every country is begging to sign more just like it. But, Trump will take care of that -- renege on a major deal and impose tariffs that won't protect any jobs, but will raise prices here.

Xolodno

(6,390 posts)
15. Mixed bag.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:07 PM
Jan 2017

No doubt some industries were going to be hurt profusely...and some perhaps wiped out by the TPP so much that our government kept it under wraps so no groups could organize against it.

But with that said, this probably puts China in the driver seat in regards to all trade in Asia. And yes, this probably does benefit Trump. For all his bluster with Taiwan and pissing off Beijing...it was all smoke and mirrors, Trump has investments in China and the TPP may have harmed them.

So damned if you do, damned if you don't.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
21. Yep. We are losing our GLOBAL place in the world.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:14 PM
Jan 2017

Globalization can NOT be stopped, it can only be delayed. We're fucked.

 

TrekLuver

(2,573 posts)
28. We need to get a message out to the world...toe the line for 4 years and we'll be back...this
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:21 PM
Jan 2017

is just a blip in the road...we'll be back...we're just taking a little vacation in hell. OMG if we don't lead someone else will. And look what happened last time someone else led! You would think people would realize that...it's not in depth concepts here.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
17. In my opinion...
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:10 PM
Jan 2017

Bernie did not and still does not have the policy chops to understand many complex issues like TPP. In my opinion, he misled a lot of people.

Cha

(297,180 posts)
26. hate, ignorance, anger trumped everything
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:19 PM
Jan 2017

this time around.

We have to hang in there until it's time for intelligence, experience, courage and compassion again.

fun n serious

Yavin4

(35,438 posts)
23. Exactly. Middle class paying factory jobs for people with a HS education or less are a
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:15 PM
Jan 2017

thing of the past. We're not going back to 1950s America.

Cha

(297,180 posts)
30. To borrow an overused word, eh?
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:21 PM
Jan 2017

I feel funny using that word now #sad

Have you seen this? It's funny

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
31. Hillary agreed with Bernie. Did she also mislead a lot of people?
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 06:22 PM
Jan 2017

From "Hillary Clinton comes out against Obama’s Pacific trade deal":

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton announced Wednesday that she opposes an expansive 12-nation Pacific Rim free-trade accord finalized by the Obama administration this week, breaking sharply with the president over a deal she had championed while serving as secretary of state.

Clinton said in an interview with PBS that she would not support the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) based on what she knows of the deal. The 30-chapter text of the agreement, which negotiators concluded Monday, has not been made public.

"As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it," Clinton said in the interview. "I have said from the very beginning that we had to have a trade agreement that would create good American jobs, raise wages and advance our national security. I still believe that's the high bar we have to meet. I've been trying to learn as much as I can about the agreement, but I'm worried."

"I appreciate the hard work that President Obama and his team put into this process and recognize the strides they made," Clinton said in a statement released to reporters traveling with her in Iowa. "But the bar here is very high and, based on what I have seen, I don't believe this agreement has met it."


I personally agree with both Bernie and Hillary on this issue.

Response to Jim Lane (Reply #31)

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
42. I agree.
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 07:17 PM
Jan 2017

What is super disturbing is that so called progressives would buy into that and not have the USA be front and center in a global economy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»donnie hands china a majo...