Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's lies are pure Big Brother crude (Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker)
Orwells 1984 and Trumps Americahttp://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/orwells-1984-and-trumps-america
There is nothing subtle about Trumps behavior. He lies, he repeats the lie, and his listeners either cower in fear, stammer in disbelief, or try to see how they can turn the lie to their own benefit. Every continental wiseguy, from iek to Baudrillard, insisted that when they pulled the full totalitarian wool over our eyes next time, we wouldnt even know it was happening. Not a bit of it. Trumps lies, and his urge to tell them, are pure Big Brother crude, however oafish their articulation. They are not postmodern traps and temptations; they are primitive schoolyard taunts and threats.
The blind, blatant disregard for truth is offered without even the sugar-façade of sweetness of temper or equableness or entertainmentoffered not with a sheen of condescending consensus but in an ancient tone of rage, vanity, and vengeance. Trump is pure raging authoritarian id.
And so, rereading Orwell, one is reminded of what Orwell got right about this kind of brute authoritarianismand that was essentially that it rests on lies told so often, and so repeatedly, that fighting the lie becomes not simply more dangerous but more exhausting than repeating it. Orwell saw, to his credit, that the act of falsifying reality is only secondarily a way of changing perceptions. It is, above all, a way of asserting power.
When Trump repeats the ridiculous story about the three million illegal votersa story that no one who knows, that not a single White House staffer, not a single Republican congressman actually believes to be truehe does not really care if anyone believes it, even if, at some crazy level, he does, sort of. People arent meant to believe it; theyre meant to be intimidated by it. The lie is not a claim about specific facts; the lunacy is a deliberate challenge to the whole larger idea of sanity. Once a lie that big is in circulation, trying to reel the conversation back into the territory of rational argument becomes impossible.
And so CNNs Jake Tapper, to his credit, may announce boldly that the story is false from beginning to endbut then he is led by his own caution and sense of professionalism to ask Trump whether, if he sees it as true, there ought to be an investigation into it. Tapper, like everyone else, knows perfectly well that a minimally honest investigation would turn up no proof of this absurdity at all. But that, of course, is the trap, the game. Watch: there will be a commission consisting of experts borrowed from Breitbart; it will hold no hearings, or hold absurdly closed ones; or hold ones with testimony from frequent callers to The Alex Jones Showand this clownish commission will then baldly conclude that there is, indeed, widespread evidence of voter fraud. And Trump will reassert the lie and point to his commissions findings as his evidence.
Meanwhile, the Republicans in Congress, thoroughly intimidated, fear shining from one eye and cupidity from the other, will exploit the question of voter fraud to pursue policies of actually suppressing minority voters. Caligula, the mad Roman emperor, infamously appointed his horse Incitatus to the Roman Senate, and that has been for millennia a byword for cracked authoritarian action. But we now know what would happen if Caligula appointed his horse to the Senate if the modern Republican Party happened to be in the majority there: first the Republicans would say that they didnt want to get into disputes about the Emperors personnel choices, and then theyd quickly see how the presence of the horse could help justify dismantling regulations in the horse-chariot industry. (Well, you know, hes an unorthodox kind of Emperor, so I dont want to get into that, Jakebut I will say that, whatever the Emperors beliefs, we have a very inclusive party, and, if were slackening regulations on the stables, I want to point out its with the full and welcome participation of a horse.) The Emperors lunacy and the senators larceny match perfectly.
Starting this week, its vital that everyone who is trying to maintain sanity understand that this is sothat it is a myth that reason, as normally undertaken, is going to affect this process or that consequences, as they are normally understood, will, either. Whenever there is an authoritarian coup rooted in an irrational ideology, well-meaning people insist that it cant persist because the results are going to be so obviously bad for the people who believe in it, whether its the theocratic revolution in Iran or the first truly autocratic Administration in America. Tragically, terribly, this is never the way it works. There is no political cost for Trump in being seen to be incompetent, impulsive, shallow, inconsistent, and contemptuous of truth and reason. Those are his politics. This is how he achieved power. His base loves craziness, incompetence, and contempt for reason because sanity, competence, and the patient accumulation of evidence are things that allow educated people to pretend that they are superior. Resentment comes before reason. Conservative intellectuals, as a reading of the Times each day reveals, turn out to share these resentments far more deeply than they value the rational practices
-snip-
On the positive side, well, there were the womens marches last weekend, which filled any sane heart with hope. What had seemed doubtful a short week beforethat there could be unified, peaceful, indeed joyous mass action against the madnesswas fully realized, and for what one hopes will be only the first of many times. It left our minds inspired with simple slogans that did not oversimplify: Community is the only cure for catastrophe. Action is the only antidote to anger.
-snip-
The blind, blatant disregard for truth is offered without even the sugar-façade of sweetness of temper or equableness or entertainmentoffered not with a sheen of condescending consensus but in an ancient tone of rage, vanity, and vengeance. Trump is pure raging authoritarian id.
And so, rereading Orwell, one is reminded of what Orwell got right about this kind of brute authoritarianismand that was essentially that it rests on lies told so often, and so repeatedly, that fighting the lie becomes not simply more dangerous but more exhausting than repeating it. Orwell saw, to his credit, that the act of falsifying reality is only secondarily a way of changing perceptions. It is, above all, a way of asserting power.
When Trump repeats the ridiculous story about the three million illegal votersa story that no one who knows, that not a single White House staffer, not a single Republican congressman actually believes to be truehe does not really care if anyone believes it, even if, at some crazy level, he does, sort of. People arent meant to believe it; theyre meant to be intimidated by it. The lie is not a claim about specific facts; the lunacy is a deliberate challenge to the whole larger idea of sanity. Once a lie that big is in circulation, trying to reel the conversation back into the territory of rational argument becomes impossible.
And so CNNs Jake Tapper, to his credit, may announce boldly that the story is false from beginning to endbut then he is led by his own caution and sense of professionalism to ask Trump whether, if he sees it as true, there ought to be an investigation into it. Tapper, like everyone else, knows perfectly well that a minimally honest investigation would turn up no proof of this absurdity at all. But that, of course, is the trap, the game. Watch: there will be a commission consisting of experts borrowed from Breitbart; it will hold no hearings, or hold absurdly closed ones; or hold ones with testimony from frequent callers to The Alex Jones Showand this clownish commission will then baldly conclude that there is, indeed, widespread evidence of voter fraud. And Trump will reassert the lie and point to his commissions findings as his evidence.
Meanwhile, the Republicans in Congress, thoroughly intimidated, fear shining from one eye and cupidity from the other, will exploit the question of voter fraud to pursue policies of actually suppressing minority voters. Caligula, the mad Roman emperor, infamously appointed his horse Incitatus to the Roman Senate, and that has been for millennia a byword for cracked authoritarian action. But we now know what would happen if Caligula appointed his horse to the Senate if the modern Republican Party happened to be in the majority there: first the Republicans would say that they didnt want to get into disputes about the Emperors personnel choices, and then theyd quickly see how the presence of the horse could help justify dismantling regulations in the horse-chariot industry. (Well, you know, hes an unorthodox kind of Emperor, so I dont want to get into that, Jakebut I will say that, whatever the Emperors beliefs, we have a very inclusive party, and, if were slackening regulations on the stables, I want to point out its with the full and welcome participation of a horse.) The Emperors lunacy and the senators larceny match perfectly.
Starting this week, its vital that everyone who is trying to maintain sanity understand that this is sothat it is a myth that reason, as normally undertaken, is going to affect this process or that consequences, as they are normally understood, will, either. Whenever there is an authoritarian coup rooted in an irrational ideology, well-meaning people insist that it cant persist because the results are going to be so obviously bad for the people who believe in it, whether its the theocratic revolution in Iran or the first truly autocratic Administration in America. Tragically, terribly, this is never the way it works. There is no political cost for Trump in being seen to be incompetent, impulsive, shallow, inconsistent, and contemptuous of truth and reason. Those are his politics. This is how he achieved power. His base loves craziness, incompetence, and contempt for reason because sanity, competence, and the patient accumulation of evidence are things that allow educated people to pretend that they are superior. Resentment comes before reason. Conservative intellectuals, as a reading of the Times each day reveals, turn out to share these resentments far more deeply than they value the rational practices
-snip-
On the positive side, well, there were the womens marches last weekend, which filled any sane heart with hope. What had seemed doubtful a short week beforethat there could be unified, peaceful, indeed joyous mass action against the madnesswas fully realized, and for what one hopes will be only the first of many times. It left our minds inspired with simple slogans that did not oversimplify: Community is the only cure for catastrophe. Action is the only antidote to anger.
-snip-
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1127 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's lies are pure Big Brother crude (Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker) (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Jan 2017
OP
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)1. A good read
frazzled
(18,402 posts)2. The scariest (but truest) part ...
Starting this week, its vital that everyone who is trying to maintain sanity understand that this is sothat it is a myth that reason, as normally undertaken, is going to affect this process or that consequences, as they are normally understood, will, either. Whenever there is an authoritarian coup rooted in an irrational ideology, well-meaning people insist that it cant persist because the results are going to be so obviously bad for the people who believe in it, whether its the theocratic revolution in Iran or the first truly autocratic Administration in America. Tragically, terribly, this is never the way it works. There is no political cost for Trump in being seen to be incompetent, impulsive, shallow, inconsistent, and contemptuous of truth and reason.
There was another 1984 story today, in the New York Times. (Again, in the Arts section, which normally doesn't deal with politics very directly, but has done so repeatedly this week). In it, the Times chief book reviewer discusses Orwell's intentions and also Hannah Arendt's The Origins of Totalitarianism.
Why 1984 Is a 2017 Must-Read
By MICHIKO KAKUTANIJAN. 26, 2017
Another book, published two years after 1984, also made Amazons list of top 100 best sellers this week: Hannah Arendts The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951). A kind of nonfiction bookend to 1984, the hefty philosophical volume examines the factors that fueled the perfect storm of events leading to the rise of Hitler and Stalin and World War II notably, the power that centralized storytelling can exert over anxious populations suffering from the dislocations of history, by offering scapegoats, easy fixes and simple cohesive narratives. If such narratives are riddled with lies, so much the better for those in power, who then succeed in redefining the daily reality inhabited by their subjects.
Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, Arendt wrote, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. This mixture of gullibility and cynicism, Arendt suggested, thrived in times rife with change and uncertainty, and was exploited by politicians intent on creating a fictional world in which failures need not be recorded, admitted, and remembered. In this world, 2 + 2 does = 5, as Orwell noted, and the acceptance of bad arithmetic simply becomes a testament to the power of rulers to define reality and the terms of debate.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/26/books/why-1984-is-a-2017-must-read.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Farts&action=click&contentCollection=arts®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=16&pgtype=sectionfront&_r=0
By MICHIKO KAKUTANIJAN. 26, 2017
Another book, published two years after 1984, also made Amazons list of top 100 best sellers this week: Hannah Arendts The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951). A kind of nonfiction bookend to 1984, the hefty philosophical volume examines the factors that fueled the perfect storm of events leading to the rise of Hitler and Stalin and World War II notably, the power that centralized storytelling can exert over anxious populations suffering from the dislocations of history, by offering scapegoats, easy fixes and simple cohesive narratives. If such narratives are riddled with lies, so much the better for those in power, who then succeed in redefining the daily reality inhabited by their subjects.
Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, Arendt wrote, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. This mixture of gullibility and cynicism, Arendt suggested, thrived in times rife with change and uncertainty, and was exploited by politicians intent on creating a fictional world in which failures need not be recorded, admitted, and remembered. In this world, 2 + 2 does = 5, as Orwell noted, and the acceptance of bad arithmetic simply becomes a testament to the power of rulers to define reality and the terms of debate.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/26/books/why-1984-is-a-2017-must-read.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Farts&action=click&contentCollection=arts®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=16&pgtype=sectionfront&_r=0
mopinko
(70,103 posts)3. he picked a really great thing to argue about. arithmetic is not going anywhere
in this day and age. i hope.