Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 02:10 PM Feb 2017

Jeff Sessions, as AG, will be a rubber stamp for Donald Trump.

The most dangerous nomination up to this point.

No doubt, Trump will use him at every opportunity.

Jeffrey Beauregard Sessions will never disagree with Donald Trump.

Unfortunately, by Party line vote, he will be the next Attorney General.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeff Sessions, as AG, will be a rubber stamp for Donald Trump. (Original Post) kentuck Feb 2017 OP
Disgusting and horrifying. gademocrat7 Feb 2017 #1
your anger should be at Harry Reid doodle1 Feb 2017 #2
Repubs were holding up many, many appointments of judges. kentuck Feb 2017 #3
I don't think the republicans will do that doodle1 Feb 2017 #7
Democrats responded to what their base wanted. SaschaHM Feb 2017 #6
Obama appointed a lot of judges... kentuck Feb 2017 #8
I'm not blaming them for doing it and I do think it has worked out for the better. SaschaHM Feb 2017 #9
Looking forward to the torture memo. HassleCat Feb 2017 #4
no doubt AlexSFCA Feb 2017 #5
 

doodle1

(13 posts)
2. your anger should be at Harry Reid
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 02:15 PM
Feb 2017

mine is

Senate Democrats took the dramatic step Thursday of eliminating filibusters for most nominations by presidents, a power play they said was necessary to fix a broken system but one that Republicans said will only rupture it further.

Democrats used a rare parliamentary move to change the rules so that federal judicial nominees and executive-office appointments can advance to confirmation votes by a simple majority of senators, rather than the 60-vote supermajority that has been the standard for nearly four decades.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-poised-to-limit-filibusters-in-party-line-vote-that-would-alter-centuries-of-precedent/2013/11/21/d065cfe8-52b6-11e3-9fe0-fd2ca728e67c_story.html?utm_term=.02d5b9c018a2

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
3. Repubs were holding up many, many appointments of judges.
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 02:19 PM
Feb 2017

I disagree that it was a bad decision.

Also, Reid did not eliminate the 60-vote rule for SC Justices. That will be up to Republicans to eliminate.

 

doodle1

(13 posts)
7. I don't think the republicans will do that
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 02:46 PM
Feb 2017

with SC justices. Too much power has already been given to the majority and just like this backfired on the Dems it will also back fire on the repubs.

Then what do I know, things have been turned around and are upside down, at least from my perspective

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
6. Democrats responded to what their base wanted.
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 02:32 PM
Feb 2017

Folks were raging and calling them spineless for not getting rid of the filibuster. Now the base is paying the price.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
8. Obama appointed a lot of judges...
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 03:48 PM
Feb 2017

when the rule was eliminated. Some say that is the one of the legacies of the Obama Presidency. It is good that they are in place at this time.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
9. I'm not blaming them for doing it and I do think it has worked out for the better.
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 03:59 PM
Feb 2017

I just take issue with this new "It's all Harry Reid's fault" meme when people were furious at the Dems for not getting rid of the filibuster when they were being obstructed.

AlexSFCA

(6,139 posts)
5. no doubt
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 02:27 PM
Feb 2017

Sessions will stop enforcing civil liberties. He is also needed to proceed with quick mass deportations.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jeff Sessions, as AG, wil...