Why aren't Mark LEVIN, Hannity, Andy NAPOLITANO (& more) ever *accountable*?!

[UTUSN]

So HANNITY is a medieval MONK firing up the Crusades; LEVIN and NAPOLITANO are self-hating whatevers; F***er CARLSON (who started both Willie GEIST and Rachel) is the scion of his sperminator Richard who was likely the source for the slander on Sid BLUMENTHAL, and we could go on and on.

So: Who are the least accountable a-holes?

1 vote, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Mark LEVIN
	0 (0%)
	F***er CARLSON
	0 (0%)
	Matt "champaigne-brunch" DRUDGE
	1 (100%)
	Mad Monk HANNITY
	0 (0%)
	1950s sexually Repressed/Oppressing White Dude O'LOOFAH
	0 (0%)
	"Judge" repressed/oppressing NAPOLITANO
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

1. First Amendment. They are allowed to say all sorts of terrible, stupid shit.

It's up to the consumers of information to hold them accountable.

[UTUSN]

2. O.K., so that would be *ME*!1 Awesome responsibility on me. n/t

[Jonny Appleseed]

3. Essentially they're getting "more" free speech based on the amount that their corporate

overlords can funnel to them. It's legally insoluble but morally reprehensible. This isn't "an individual's right to express themselves" it's a corporation's right to express itself through people.
And what is a corporation but the blood, sweat and toil of the workers who have a wide array of ideologies. However you slice it, their labors are being channeled into a single entity that represents a single agenda.

[tavernier]

4. O'Reilly can say or do any kind of BS

and it's instantly gospel at fox.