Joan Walsh: Too Many of Trumps Liberal Critics Are Praising His Strike on Syria
https://www.thenation.com/article/too-many-of-trumps-liberal-critics-are-praising-his-strike-on-syria/Too Many of Trump’s Liberal Critics Are Praising His Strike on Syria
Anyone who supports these missile strikes has to account for what comes next.
By Joan WalshTwitter
Today 2:19 pm
It shouldn’t be surprising, but it is to me nonetheless: Plenty of liberals who’ve long criticized Donald Trump as unfit to be president are praising his strike on Syrian airfields.
On CNN’s New Day Thursday, global analyst Fareed Zakaria declared, “I think Donald Trump became president of the United States” last night. To his credit, Zakaria has previously called Trump a “bullshit artist” and said, “He has gotten the presidency by bullshitting.” But Zakaria apparently thinks firing missiles make one presidential. On MSNBC, Nicholas Kristof, an aggressive Trump critic, said he “did the right thing” by bombing Syria. Anchor Brian Williams, whose 11th Hour has regularly been critical of Trump, repeatedly called the missiles “beautiful,” to a noisy backlash on Twitter.
While The New York Times posted several skeptical, even critical stories, it gave us this piece of propaganda: an article initially titled “On Syria attack, Trump’s heart came first,” buying the president’s line that his opposition to anti-Assad military action was reversed by seeing the heartrending photos of children struggling to breathe after a chemical attack.
“Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered in this very barbaric attack,” Trump declared. “No child of God should ever suffer such horror.” (No word how he felt about ugly babies.) The piece also failed to even mention that Trump is keeping refugees from the Syrian war, even children, out of the United States. Victims of chemical weapons are “beautiful babies”; children trying to flee such violence require “extreme vetting” and an indefinite refugee ban. After a public outcry, the Times changed the headline.
snip//
There remains the possibility that some of this is theater. It should be said: Some observers, besides RT, say it’s unproven that the chemical weapons attack came from Assad; rebels could be behind it. There’s also the possibility of a kabuki performance from Trump, Putin, and Assad. We already know the United States warned Putin of the coming missiles, and that Putin warned Assad, whose military moved airplanes and other military equipment away from the intended target. Trump, plummeting in the polls, his domestic health-care and tax plans on the rocks, the investigation into Russian election meddling closing in on his team, really needed a boost; maybe they gave it to him. Trump’s sudden about-face on Syria makes it hard to judge.
However, according to Syrian state media, nine civilians, including four children, were killed in the air strikes. That is not kabuki. Trump has said nothing about those “beautiful babies,” nor will he. Liberals have to sober up and stop being besotted by beautiful missiles and presidential cruelty. Trump is the same Trump he was Tuesday, and that should scare all of us.
= new reply since forum marked as read
It was all I could do to keep from ...... 
I think it's total bullshit. He was advised by his cohorts (Bannon & Co.) that this was a perfect opportunity to gain some credibility points with the American public. And it worked. Even Lindsey and John are out there praising him with references to Reagan Of course there's not a bombing that McCain does not like.
As many have said, and I agree, those missile strikes were a coordinated act of a play between tRump and his puppet master/blackmailer putin. Yeah, putin's tired of Assad and of Assad's side-piece Iran, and he's probably angry at having to watch Assad's back. However, putin told HIS useful idiot--and a guy he can blackmail whenever he wants to--to do air strikes which really didn't do anything but get some people on the left having tingles up their leg because they've not seen missile explosions in a long time. Humm, I wonder WHY the part of the air strip with chemical weapons contained on it wasn't hit. I wonder why 
What WAS the point of doing the air strike raids then? How "curious" also that Syrian pilots were flying airplanes off of that same air strip TODAY to carry out strikes on areas under ISIS control in the countryside where civilians will undoubtedly be hit. Makes me think that the air strip was not meant to be totally destroyed. Plus, he will get some kind of bounce in polling from some quarters over this air strike. I hear that MANY on the Alt-right/nazi wing of the GOP are mad as wet hornets over those air strikes carried out by their American First president. I "guess" putin told his puppet "Go ahead my little puppet, make yourself look big and bad--but don't you DARE hit the area where the chemical weapons are resting," and tRumputin interjected "NO NO Geppetto I won't, cross my heart hope to die stick a needle in my eye." Where upon putin said "I'll do more than stick a needle in your eye if you hit those chemical weapons Comrade." I only care about getting my poll numbers up from 34%, and to make us look like mortal enemies. These air strikes will almost be as fun as the pussy-grabbing I love doing."
Love Tap Tomahawk missile strikes which didn't destroy the chemical weapons that was used to kill those poor "babies" that tRumputin pretended to give a damn about who he told to "Stay the hell out of the USA" up until a few days ago
I call BS on those ineffective air strikes which were nothing more than an act out of a play with many acts between putin and his presidentially installed puppet tRumputin.
Good Gawd, no foreign policy having tRumputin told bannon a nazi and his Jewish son-in-law to "work this out" in that filthy, treasonous den of SNAKES known as tRumputin's Illegitimate White House.
was worthless except for the costs missiles and Wall rise for contractors, waste of TOMAHAWKS which didn't destroy shit. Was a distraction from Russian investigation.
