General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo 20 aircraft is 20 % ..of what.??
Due to the high security level on everything military related, the past and present of the Syrian Arab Air Force is still largely unknown. This makes it hard to judge the real strength of the air force today.[61] Additionally, considerable losses to the opposition forces in the country's ongoing civil war are not accounted for here. The following information is compiled from multiple, pre 2012 Syrian civil war sources.
According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies in 2011 the aircraft inventory from Syrian Arab Air Force estimations, was:[62][63]
575 fixed-wing aircraft:
Combat/reconnaissance/OCU aircraft: 461
Training aircraft: 76
Transport aircraft: 26
191 rotary-wing aircraft:
Attack helicopters: 71
Armed transport/utility helicopters: 120
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Arab_Air_Force
Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)(Oh, and I don't understand what he's saying, either!)
Anyway,
@WillemHartman1
8h
Replying to @MalcolmNance
I've read that the strike destroyed 20% of aircraft. Syria has probably 450 migs so that would be 90 planes... not sure if it's true.
@MalcolmNance
Replying to @WillemHartman1
BDA: Six Su-22 Fitters/Mig-27s and maybe 3 derelict Mig-21s. They will replace w/new Su-25 Frogfoots & Mig-29s. We upgraded their inventory.
11:59 AM - 11 Apr 2017
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)when they have a dozen bases? Not to mention a warning the attack was coming.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)And they think we're too stupid to notice.
FBaggins
(26,732 posts)That number according to Jane's
pbmus
(12,422 posts)FBaggins
(26,732 posts)Jane's is fairly widely accepted as the best unclassified source.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)Syrian Air Force...
oasis
(49,381 posts)PJMcK
(22,035 posts)Small note: her name is Betsy.
(wink)
herding cats
(19,564 posts)That's a tad more than 100 aircraft, no?
Mattis misspoke and couldn't admit it, or he lied initially and refused to admit being caught. Either way it was untrustworthy and bodes ill for his credibility.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)WHY make up shit...??
I'm this stuff has reached insane levels in record time!
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)His statement provides confirmation bias to Trump supporters.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)operational aircraft numbers. Given the age of the fleet I'm sure that a high percentage are not operational.
If you want to make your mission look like the biggest success you quote against the smaller number. And of course operational numbers are only estimated so they can choose what estimates they use.