Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
Sun Apr 16, 2017, 10:09 PM Apr 2017

Nuclear Weapons inbuilt bias. Why nations feel they must have them...

I was talking with my father and he brought up this point from an article that he had read.

The problem with nuclear weapons, besides their terrifying power, or because of it, is that they quickly become powerful geopolitical tools.

There is this unspoken idea that we have a list of countries that we "trust" with nuclear weapons. Usually westernized nations with economies similar to ours. The truth is mostly these are just countries we see as our allies. It's difficult to argue that nuclear weapons are necessarily safe in any counties hands. And indeed the only country to have ever dropped one on a populated target is the US.

Nuclear Weapons are more symbol and tools than actual weapons. They represent respect and fear. Countries that possess them are placed in a special category that must be treated with kid gloves if they are not our immediate allies.

One thing that the global super powers do at times of course is treat smaller nations with extreme contempt. Indeed at various times the US, Russia, China and other countries have actively supported coups, toppled foreign regimes, and simply greatly meddled in the affairs of other nations to disastrous effect, for their own gains.

So it's not surprising that many such nations feel threatened and want a bulwark against said super powers. One quick way to gain "respect" and hands off status is to gain nuclear weapons.

Let me be clear I'm not arguing that nations like North Korea should have nuclear weapons. Indeed the thought scares me. But neither should anyone have them. The problem is that once they have been invented and used a precedent has been set the genie is out of the bag. It then becomes very difficult to argue that there should be some nations that are allowed to have them and others that can't. Based on what? Morals, cultural values, past history with their use? The US certainly fails in each of those categories at different times. Certainly NK is probably the last country that I would want to have them but that argument quickly becomes hypocritical and condescending sounding when you have the largest such arsenal in the world.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nuclear Weapons inbuilt bias. Why nations feel they must have them... (Original Post) Locut0s Apr 2017 OP
Countries with nukes don't get invaded. If Iraq had nukes, bush would not have invaded. Hoyt Apr 2017 #1
It's hypocritical, but I wouldn't call it a fit... Locut0s Apr 2017 #2
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
1. Countries with nukes don't get invaded. If Iraq had nukes, bush would not have invaded.
Sun Apr 16, 2017, 10:18 PM
Apr 2017

It is hypocritical for us to throw a fit over North Korea. Truth is, we are the only country to kill people with nukes.

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
2. It's hypocritical, but I wouldn't call it a fit...
Sun Apr 16, 2017, 10:24 PM
Apr 2017

A Nuclear armed NK is scary to me. I just don't know what the solution is once the nuclear genie is out of the bag.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nuclear Weapons inbuilt b...