General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING UPDATE: Police: Multiple people shot and killed as gunman goes on shooting spree in Fresno
Three people are dead in a shooting spree in downtown Fresno on Tuesday, and the suspect was wanted in connection to the Motel 6 killing last week, the Fresno Police Department said.
Kori Ali Muhammad, 39, shouted "Allahu Akbar" as police tackled him to the ground after the shootings which were spread over four locations, Police Chief Jerry Dyer said.
The victims appeared to be random, Dyer said.
Shot Spotter detected the first gunshots around 10:45 a.m. Muhammad shot into a PG&E vehicle killing the passenger. The driver sped away and drove to Fresno Police headquarters.
Read more:
http://www.yourcentralvalley.com/news/suspect-in-fresno-shooting-spree-that-killed-3-shouts-allahu-akbar-when-arrested/693838151
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
herding cats
(19,564 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)"Not again" We hoped, after Sandy Hook, that at least the monsters in the Republican Party (aka NRA) would wake up, but no.
Damn it! DAMN IT TO HELL!
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,989 posts)Marengo
(3,477 posts)Coventina
(27,115 posts)Maybe it's constant lobbying against any reasonable gun control laws.
Constant lobbying for more guns in more places (schools, bars, etc.).
Giving brazilions of dollars to pro-gun candidates.
Actively trying to unseat any politician that is for any kind of gun control.
"My cold, dead hands."
Promoting "the Nuge" as a figurehead.
(Someone who actually threatened violence against Hillary Clinton).
Against SAFETY FEATURES in guns.
Against ammo limits.
I could go on.....
On edit: clarity
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,989 posts)ansible
(1,718 posts)It won't help much, especially when this guy is allegedly muslim.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)And so what if he's Muslim?
Muslims don't magically grow guns, they get them the same way everyone else does.
ansible
(1,718 posts)Really?
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Islamic terrorism is definitely a problem, but I am not going to blame the whole religion.
Yikes!
That's like saying all Christians are like the KKK.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)he was a felon who could not legally own guns.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)They must be doing something right.
hack89
(39,171 posts)they also have rational policies regarding drugs and mental health. We don't.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)That does not hold up to any kind of scrutiny.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Persons in poor households at or below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) (39.8 per 1,000) had more than double the rate of violent victimization as persons in high-income households (16.9 per 1,000).
Persons in poor households had a higher rate of violence involving a firearm (3.5 per 1,000) compared to persons above the FPL (0.82.5 per 1,000).
The overall pattern of poor persons having the highest rates of violent victimization was consistent for both whites and blacks. However, the rate of violent victimization for Hispanics did not vary across poverty levels.
Poor Hispanics (25.3 per 1,000) had lower rates of violence compared to poor whites (46.4 per 1,000) and poor blacks (43.4 per 1,000).
Poor persons living in urban areas (43.9 per 1,000) had violent victimization rates similar to poor persons living in rural areas (38.8 per 1,000).
Poor urban blacks (51.3 per 1,000) had rates of violence similar to poor urban whites (56.4 per 1,000).
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5137
Coventina
(27,115 posts)And, it doesn't explain one of the facts in your post: that there was no variation for Hispanics across economic levels.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I said that societies that invest significant resources in healthcare, education, and jobs have healthier, less violent societies.
Seems non-controversial to me.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)And their gun violence plummeted?
hack89
(39,171 posts)it is not like they had US type social issues that fueled a US level of violence. They did not have large urban centers with large, violent drug gangs for example. So "plummeted" is a relative term.
80 percent of Australian gun deaths prior to the ban were suicides and accidents - a similar rate to America's. Gun violence is really a suicide problem.
The Australian government bought back tens of thousands of guns. We could not afford Australian style buy backs in America - the cost would be astronomical.
And finally - the number of guns in Australia is now back to pre-ban levels.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)The chances of being murdered by a gun in Australia plunged to 0.15 per 100,000 people in 2014 from 0.54 per 100,000 people in 1996, a decline of 72 percent, a Reuters analysis of Australian Bureau of Statistics figures showed.
In 1996, Australia had 311 murders, of which 98 were with guns. In 2014, with the population up from about 18 million to 23 million, Australia had 238 murders, of which 35 were with guns.
It was the April 28, 1996, shooting deaths by a lone gunman of 35 people in and around a cafe at a historic former prison colony in Tasmania that prompted the government to buy back or confiscate a million firearms and make it harder to buy new ones.
The country has had no mass shootings since.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-guns-idUSKCN0XP0HG
And, gun buybacks were in the US have been largely successful. I think as the richest nation on earth, we could figure out how to upscale them without bankrupting the country.
hack89
(39,171 posts)goes to my point that they had a very low murder rate to begin with.
Show me the declines prior to the gun ban please.
Gun buy backs have not been successful in America. They are not even a drop in the bucket.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)before the gun ban.
The burden of proof is on you as the one making the claim.
Gun buybacks have been very popular. They might be a drop in the bucket compared to the ridiculous number of guns in circulation, but they are proof that people are interested in such programs.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)A significant number being antiques, inoperative, or of types infrequently used in crime.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)I'm sorry that your life is so full of fear that a deadly weapon comes before people.
Peace Be With You.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"they also have rational policies regarding drugs and mental health..."
And firearms, as well...
hack89
(39,171 posts)if there was broad public support for them. UBCs seems like a no brainer - my state has them and it works. There are no real legal barriers to strict gun control, just political and cultural ones.
In the mean time, there are easier ways to reduce gun deaths without gun control. A national anti-suicide campaign coupled to improved access to mental health would be a great place to start considering two thirds of gun deaths are suicides. A second step would be to focus the legal system on violent offenders with guaranteed prison time for any crime committed with a gun.
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,989 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)this guy was a nutball felon who could not legally own guns.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)But their promotion of guns, paranoia among gun owners, and the delusion of "the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun" have vastly contributed to the problems we have in the number of guns circulating, and the many ways felons can get guns.
hack89
(39,171 posts)he is a member of a violent criminal sub-culture that covets guns in pursuit of criminal activity, not because of any thing the NRA says. There are many gun "cultures" in America. The NRA is irrelevant to some.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)for guns to be tracked and kept out of the hands of criminals.
They want people suspected of terrorism to be able to buy guns!
I don't know how much clearer I can be that they happily aid and abet the ease with which criminals get guns!!!
hack89
(39,171 posts)you really think the government should be able to take away constitutional rights in secret with no due process?
You must have loved the Patriot Act.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)on edit: spelling
hack89
(39,171 posts)so tell me - say it was some other right other than guns. Would you still support the government being able to take away rights in secret with no due process? Or is it only guns?
Coventina
(27,115 posts)was not and never was supposed to mean that people get to use deadly force just 'cuz they feel like it.
your knowledge of the 2A is pretty bad. Even Scalia in Heller says that the 2A allows strict regulation of guns. I bet nearly every law you want would be constitutional - AWBs, registration, UBCs, magazine size limits all perfectly constitutional.
The reason gun control is a smoking wreck in America is the lack of deep public support. Time to stop using the 2A as an excuse and get to work if you want things to change.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)means the gov't is coming to take Grandpappy's deer huntin' rifle.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Abortion is legal and Republicans do everything they can to limit it.
hack89
(39,171 posts)the only right that is protected is the right to own a handgun in the privacy of your home. AWBs, UBCs, registration, etc are all perfectly constitution.
Time to stop using the 2A as an excuse - it is not your problem. The lack of wide public support is.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Coventina
(27,115 posts)Guns are designed to do one thing and one thing only: kill.
I would say knives designed as weapons should be disallowed to terrorist suspects.
Silverware? Of course not.
Motor vehicles? Case-by-case basis.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Impressive for something not designed as a weapon.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Nice try on the distraction, but it won't work.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Coventina
(27,115 posts)We were talking about guns.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)To limit access to those things by suspected terrorists?
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Background check for motor vehicle purchases? What would be the prohibiting criteria?
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Clearly, it's what you want to do.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)How would this prohibition be implemented? What characteristics define a knife designed as a weapon?
askyagerz
(776 posts)The criminal element have so many guns cause the NRA has lobbied to make more guns then people and therefore society is oversaturated with guns. Plus considering a gun can exist for about 5 human lifetime it makes them as expendable as happy meal toys. Not real hard for some moron to find one if they want.
hack89
(39,171 posts)as the number of guns in society went up. We have cut our murder and manslaughter rates in half over the past 20 years. Violent crime overall is at historic lows.
askyagerz
(776 posts)and less people in dire straights over the years. Not to mention we've locked up half of the underbelly of society. So much more policing over the years. Violent crime in general has gone down wether it be guns, knives or just assholes beating their wives. It's not like the violent crime is being stopped by more people having guns because studies show that's just not the case. I'm all about gun ownership but the NRA is flucking it up for everyone other then the gun makers
hack89
(39,171 posts)Sounds about right.
askyagerz
(776 posts)We are still one of the most violent countries on earth though. Our numbers haven't gone down nearly as mush as other industrialized countries over the years. Definitely nothing to brag about. Did you ever stop to think if we hadn't made guns as cheap as water then our violent crime rate would actually be much lower then it is now and our murder rate would have probably plummeted. Same visa versa, if they would of had easier access to more guns when crime was at it's highest don't you think those numbers might have been much higher?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)fact that gun ownership is protected only in connection to a well regulated militia.
If we did what we were supposed to do the only way this guy could have had a gun in the first place is if he was a part of the militia and took the gun out of the locked case at the well regulated militia building and went out and did this.
Our interpretation of the 2nd amendment is courtesy of the NRA and for profit corporations.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)It isnt wrong for them to be, it is just that if we dont do something drastic, it is gonna get even worse.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Why does anyone want to be "pro-killing-object"?
Especially on a liberal website?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Personally I wish there were no guns for anybody, and that we have way too many.
Many people are brought up with guns, obviously.
So changing the attitude about guns will take some time. You can be pro gun and anti gun ownership outside of the proper 2nd amendment.
For instance I think owning a single shot hunting rifle should be legal, nothing else, outside of the militia.
And to own that hunting rifle you would need training, certified training and a license.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)they want to kill us.
I need people to understand that, that the con wants liberals and democrats gone or dead.
For real.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)At least when it comes to the 2A our views are in line with the Democratic party platform and it's leadership.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Which candidate did the NRA support for POTUS?
hack89
(39,171 posts)Supporting guns does not mean support for repukes or the NRA. I am a Democrat that owns guns. There are a lot of us.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Peace Be With You.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I own guns for competitive target shooting. My entire family shoots - very social activity that is a lot of fun.
When I am not shooting, all my rifles are locked up with the ammo locked up in a different safe. I am not the problem.
hack89
(39,171 posts)President Obama and both Bernie and Hillary
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Firearms by free citizens?
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Universal background checks.
Waiting period of 10 days for all purchases
Assault weapons ban
Ban on all magazines over 10 rounds
Ban on mail order ammunition sales
Mandotory licensing of all gun owners with a safety test required
Ban on sale of all handguns except those on a specific approved list
All sales since 1991 have been registered in a state database
The state is literally everything gun prohibitionists have ever wanted. You can't blame this shooting on a lack of gun laws.
Of course when a person is set on murder breaking other laws to get there doesn't seem to matter to them. Funny how adding new laws doesn't stop people who break existing ones.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)The NRA is not directly involved, but they are a contributing factor.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Individual state gun laws are undercut by other states having lax gun laws.
For example a majority of guns used to commit crimes in Chicago were purchased out of state.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)First, it's illegal under Federal law to buy a handgun out of state at all, and illegal to buy a long gun out of state unless it goes through a dealer and a full background check is done.
So there is already a law on the book to cover the problem you identify.
Second, when you put all the laws you want in place and the problem doesn't go away, it's time to realize you have been pushing the wrong solutions instead of doubling down on more of what doesn't work.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Coventina
(27,115 posts)Making gun exponentially harder to obtain.
300 million non-smart guns will not disappear over night. And of course no technology is hackable by criminals.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Of course I realize that all the ridiculous guns will not disappear overnight.
It doesn't mean we shouldn't start trying to eradicate them.
Each gun destroyed is potential lives saved.
We have to start somewhere.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I recommend working on an anti-sucide campaign. 60 % of gun deaths are suicides so it would save a lot of lives and is more likely to actually happen.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Already in circulation not using this technology?
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Blame it on the NRA. Right.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)NRA enables this type of crime.
I don't directly blame them, but they sure make it easier to commit this kind of crime.
jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)enabler to this type crime as the NRA.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Islam is not a monolithic entity and has any number of interpretations and practices.
ALL the world's major religions do.
As I said upthread, blaming Islam for this is like blaming Christianity for what the KKK does.
I am not a gun person. Far from it.
But the fact is, the focus is on the NRA here because the killer is black and the victims were white.
If the races were reversed it would be a whole different story. It would be all about 'white Christian terrorists' etc. But that's DU for you.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)Last July, he posted about the Baton Rouge police shootings, writing, They shot Our Brother from a 100 yards through a structure. Guess you didnt have a robot. #ENJOYPARADISEGOD. He also posted a photo of a man smiling with the caption, My face when grafted white devils die.
Calculating
(2,955 posts)How the fuck is the NRA to blame for this? If he couldn't get a gun he just would've stolen a car and driven through a crowd of people like those assholes in EU do.
maxsolomon
(33,327 posts)which are a fairly new phenomenon.
but congrats on not using the "he'd have just used a knife" argument. progress.
VOX
(22,976 posts)How is the NRA responsible for this? Here's how: they are the mouthpiece of the roughly $15 billion/year firearms industry. They lobby the beejeesus out of the senate and congress and get away with murder, killing every bill that advocates basic gun safety legislation-- background checks, gun-show loopholes, making guns available to individuals afflicted with mental illness, on and on. The NRA hasn't one scintilla of shame when these mass killings occur.
You surely must know that the NRA isn't very popular here on DU. If not, you do now.
calendargirl
(191 posts)And while we're at it, I also blame the school cafeteria for serving hot dogs that made my kid obese. And Apple is responsible for making the iPhone that caused me to text and drive and kill that pedestrian the other day.
Jack-o-Lantern
(967 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)California literally has every gun control law on its books that gun prohibitionists want.
Universal background checks, waiting periods, registration of all gun sold, licensing with a mandatory safety test, assault weapons ban, the list goes on and on.
The NRA hasn't won a single battle there on gun control and the gun control advocates have gotten everything they wanted.
I don't see how they can blame the NRA when all the laws they wanted they got.
maxsolomon
(33,327 posts)since they are the best-known proponents of the necessity of firearms in daily life, and tirelessly advocate for their proliferation in this misbegotten nation.
It's not blame as much as it's "this is the nation you've helped create over the last 40 years, so fuck you".
and a 10-day waiting period? yippee skippee, I favor 30 days, if not 6 months.
hack89
(39,171 posts)where do AA criminals fit into that culture?
HoneyBadger
(2,297 posts)White gun culture smacks of privilege.
AA have a real need for guns.
Whites do not.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/12512670864#post81
That is the sense I get from reading posts like the one linked.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Regardless of race.
Why do AAs need guns more than whites? It is not whites that are killing them in large numbers.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Fresno - The armpit of California and gateway to Oakhurst.
B2G
(9,766 posts)and posted Facebook rants against white people.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)I'm sure it will be taken down soon though,. He refers to "grafted white devil" a lot in photos. The prosecutors are going to be using his FB pictures and posts against him in court.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
bathroommonkey76
(3,827 posts)Response to randome (Reply #13)
Lurks Often This message was self-deleted by its author.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Hate crime.
bathroommonkey76
(3,827 posts)There are local news reports I've read that said he targeted white people.
pfitz59
(10,377 posts)not involved, but still too close to home
sdfernando
(4,935 posts)Hope all are OK...I need to make some phone calls!
Chipper Chat
(9,678 posts)I'm sure his ears perked up at 'allah akbar'
Brother Buzz
(36,423 posts)ShotSpotter technology was explained to me a few years ago and I dismissed it as SCI FI
HoneyBadger
(2,297 posts)Watched one kid shoot at another across the street from mom as we were walking to the parked car. Had my child with me. Within 1 minute, there were a half dozen police cars there. Too slow to catch the kid on the spot though. He shot and ran.
global1
(25,244 posts)Could be helpful if available there.
Brother Buzz
(36,423 posts)27 January, 2017
Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Chicago Police Department commanders on Friday touted advances in technology that could help officers pinpoint gunfire instantly, part of their newest efforts to combat gun violence plaguing the city.
Putting a new spin on gunshot detection technology police have used on and off for years, 150 cellphones will be distributed to officers in the Englewood and Harrison districts equipped with apps that deliver shooting and incident information in real time. Police also announced the expansion of the ShotSpotter system and predictive data methods in the Englewood and Harrison districts, two of the city's highest crime areas.
ShotSpotter now covers all portions of the Englewood and Harrison districts 13.5 square miles, city officials said. Police also expanded the footprint of the Police Observation Device cameras by 25 percent to try to work better with ShotSpotter.
<more>
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-chicago-police-shotspotter-technology-met-20170127-story.html
global1
(25,244 posts)Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Austin TX
The document says the source told authorities Boehle exhibits sovereign citizen extremism ideology.
http://www.statesman.com/news/crime--law/fbi-says-austin-man-plotting-mass-shooting-arrested-weapons-charges/Js7cJF0eilpUKpmbc4wIeM/
This one is an anti-government white guy who broke in and stole 16 assault weapons and mailed a 160 page manifesto to Trump.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/manhunt-underway-gun-store-robbery-suspect-manifesto-trump/story?id=46662668
Wonder what would happen if these guys were brown skinned and called Abdullah.
hack89
(39,171 posts)a simple Google search would show you how wrong you are.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Stories about white terrorist plots have been well reported on national news? Cause I don't see much discussion about either.
But I guess you must have heard a lot about them so I apologize for giving you agita.
TexasTowelie
(112,167 posts)at least I posted about the Austin man in the Texas Group last night.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/107834728
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)If the skin were dark and the name Abdullah the national press would be all over it.
But no worries.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)HoneyBadger
(2,297 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)1. It's more about NRA versus gun control.
2. I can't find any updates about the event itself.
#2 is especially worrying. Are we so inured to mass shootings that we really don't care about the outcome?
You'd think this would be topic #1 on LBN but the last update there was at 12:34 this morning. There was something about it on TPM yesterday but now even it's clear of any mention.
Does this say something about us?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
Amishman
(5,557 posts)The attacker was an AA Muslim who targeted and shot white men out of racial hatred.
This touches on racism, Islam, terrorism, and gun laws in ways that threatens to inject nuances into what some here feel are binary issues.
Better to curse out the NRA than explore gray areas of our beliefs.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)so there are fewer posts. If this had been a white male shooting minorities while shouting racial slurs or yelling white power, the thread would have gone on for at least a week and had a couple of hundred posts.
Here is an example: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10028861876
580 posts starting March 28th with the last post on April 14th and that by all accounts was a legitimate case of self defense during a home invasion, but since the shooter was a white male using an AR-15, DU decided to be outraged.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Can't blame the person. Therefore the evil gun and the evil NRA are at fault.