General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumscsziggy
(34,136 posts)Perhaps that is simply because I have had little exposure to murals but her smaller paintings are easier to view in prints and online.
That article is offensive on so many levels.
Warpy
(111,254 posts)because he was extremely famous world wide, painting huge murals while she did small paintings on canvas and boards that were rarely offered for sale. He once predicted she'd eclipse him, saying she was the better painter, and it did ultimately happen.
So at the time, they reported what they saw, having absolutely no appreciation for art.
ETA: Diego Rivera's paintings (he did do some canvas work) are well worth looking for. His works are intensely political while hers were more surreal and dreamlike.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)But never have been exposed to any of his murals in person. What I see of his work online is not appealing to me.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)the lecture again. Some of his are very out right philosophical , or political. Others are very cryptic and need to be explained his work was censored in many countries . perhaps like themore familiar art of Michelangelo s painting there are unspoken commentary aplenty in many of the murals
The mural I heard the lecture on
http://www.diegorivera.org/dream-of-a-sunday-afternoon-in-alameda-park.jsp
Warpy
(111,254 posts)The peasant in the flower market bent down under the heavy burden of something most people consider light as a feather, calla lilies.
It was a theme he used more than once.
His collected works are at http://www.diego-rivera-foundation.org/the-complete-works.html
lunasun
(21,646 posts)But yes the beautiful Calla lily art.
I wrote above about a mural I saw and went back to hear the same lecture on it 2 days in a row. There was so much to take in.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I mean, I've heard of both of them, but I had a relative hanging out down there with the two of 'em and Trotsky.
True story.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Stargleamer
(1,989 posts)completely overshadowed her husband. My guess is her paintings fetch millions nowadays.
brush
(53,771 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)His work is really interesting, but it's just not at the level that hers was.
brush
(53,771 posts)the use of acrylic paint is most definitely taught.
Guess you didn't go to art school.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)and Diego's wasn't
Which is exactly what I was saying.
brush
(53,771 posts)Hah!
Why put down his work because of your lack of knowledge?
They are both important artists in art history and both are extensively taught.
kskiska
(27,045 posts)Rivera was a known Communist and made Lenin a focal point of the mural, "Man at the Crossroads. He refused to remove Lenin when asked, so Rockefeller had the mural destroyed.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)destroyed. The recreation is located in Mexico city at the Palacio de Bellas Artes. I saw it many years ago along with murals depicting the history of Mexico that he painted at the National Palace.
Grammy23
(5,810 posts)as a teenager on a family vacation in the 1960s. The style is very recognizable.