EXCLUSIVE: Sealed Indictment granted against Donald Trump
Last edited Sun May 14, 2017, 12:09 PM - Edit history (3)
ON EDIT:Link to tweet
Separate sources with links to the intelligence and justice communities have stated that a sealed indictment has been granted against Donald Trump.
While it is understood that the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution means that, until Mr. Trump is impeached, he cannot be prosecuted, sources say that the indictment is intended by the FBI and prosecutors in the Justice Department to form the basis of Mr. Trump’s impeachment. The indictment is, perhaps uniquely, not intended or expected to be used for prosecution, sources say, because of the constitutional position of the President.
NEW TWEET: This indicates a National Security case and likely Logan Act violations.
Link to tweet
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
As this story has developed, it has become obvious these two threads are very much intertwined:
Trump's New Impeachable Offenses: Obstruction of Justice, Conspiracy, Abuse of Power
Flynn Intel Group associates were subpoenaed by same Grand Jury just hours before Comey was fired.
BEFORE EDIT: This explains some of the first posts, before we knew what the big news would be.
Link to tweet
= new reply since forum marked as read
This time the President is the one getting the "You're FIRED" notice. 
You mean "a shoe is about to drop"?
Oh my my.
Less than 24 bidnes hours away!!!But at least now he can take the bar, become a lawyer, and defend himself.
Do they live under a bridge in Moscow, watching American social media non-stop?
But this time we got a link to this thread 
No doubt we'll get more trolls over there.
You sure have bad timing. 
Obama did not try "to get rid of Dana Boente" who he appointed to his job. Obama only changed the order of Justice Department succession. Was this because Boente was too busy investigating Trump, Manafort, Flynn, and the rest of the Russia connections?
Did Trump fall for a brilliant Obama chess move which Obama didn't even know was a chess move?
Link to tweet
.... the following officers, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, during any period in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and any officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:
(a) United States Attorney for the District of Columbia;
(b) United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; and
(c) United States Attorney for the Central District of California.
Until Comey testified this year? You're probably still blue (pun intended.)
FBI has FISA warrant for Trump secret server connected to Russia.
You may not need to hold your breath quite as long this time:
Link to tweet
