General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReuters: White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation: sources
Politics | Fri May 19, 2017 | 6:01pm EDT
White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation: sources
By Julia Edwards Ainsley | WASHINGTON
The Trump administration is exploring whether it can use an obscure ethics rule to undermine the special counsel investigation into ties between President Donald Trump's campaign team and Russia, two people familiar with White House thinking said on Friday.
Trump has said that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's hiring of former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to lead the investigation "hurts our country terribly."
Within hours of Mueller's appointment on Wednesday, the White House began reviewing the Code of Federal Regulations, which restricts newly hired government lawyers from investigating their prior law firms clients for one year after their hiring, the sources said.
An executive order signed by Trump in January extended that period to two years.
Mueller's former law firm, WilmerHale, represents Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, who met with a Russian bank executive in December, and the president's former campaign manager Paul Manafort, who is a subject of a federal investigation.
Legal experts said the ethics rule can be waived by the Justice Department, which appointed Mueller. He did not represent Kushner or Manafort directly at his former law firm.
If the department did not grant a waiver, Mueller would be barred from investigating Kushner or Manafort, and this could greatly diminish the scope of the probe, experts said.
The Justice Department is already reviewing Mueller's background as well as any potential conflicts of interest, said department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores.
more...
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-mueller-idUSKCN18F2KK?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=591f731604d3011bf3a777fa&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
elleng
(130,901 posts)DAMN!
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)Don't get too excited.
This actually proves how scared Trump is of what Mueller will find.
elleng
(130,901 posts)I'm noting possible issues/conflicts.
'Within hours of Mueller's appointment on Wednesday, the White House began reviewing the Code of Federal Regulations, which restricts newly hired government lawyers from investigating their prior law firms clients for one year after their hiring, the sources said.
An executive order signed by Trump in January extended that period to two years.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-mueller-idUSKCN18F2KK
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)that Mueller is 'corrupt'.
Mueller has a stellar reputation. The White House doesn't. This is a dishonest effort on their part to smear Mueller.
If I'm mistaken I apologize.
elleng
(130,901 posts)I recognize it's often confusing and conflicted, and takes TIME to sort out.
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)Which is what Trump Co is doing.
elleng
(130,901 posts)emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)and self-serving. I suspect Rosenstein may consider that as he moves forward.
YMMV
Have a great night!
luvMIdog
(2,533 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)I dare ya.
nocalflea
(1,387 posts)Thrill
(19,178 posts)babylonsister
(171,065 posts)emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)greymattermom
(5,754 posts)from a different firm to handle the Kushner part?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Trump can fire Rosenstein for giving the waiver. This would just invite more problems for him.
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)And as DSB points out, DOJ's Rosenstein can give him a waiver.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)You can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. Mueller gets to investigate who he wants. If Chump tries to circumscribe who he investigates he further seals his fate.
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)I can't quite articulate it but I'll give it a go:
They are claiming he is unethical because his firm represents Kushner and Manafort.
Most people would assume that means Mueller's gonna go easy on Trump.
This move is as dishonest/phony as when they claimed Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Precisely. The laws exists because of the fear the independent counsel will show favoritism, not that he will be too harsh.
Docreed2003
(16,858 posts)But we're gonna try to submarine the investigation"
Doodley
(9,089 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,378 posts)And it would be crazy not to.
malaise
(268,997 posts)they must be really guilty of collusion - LOCK THEM UP!
MedusaX
(1,129 posts)Any one hired who was formerly associated with a law firm which represented any Trumpster...
Of course no one at WH has looked into any similar ethics issues regarding their pal Lieberman's possible FBI gig....
Even though technically FBI director is not being hired as "counsel / attny" you can bet your skivvies that 45 would use the EO to squash any unfriendly investigations by FBI........
maxrandb
(15,330 posts)Brooks Brothers Spice?
I think Hillary has a law degree and is not too busy right now
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)I can't sleep at night knowing Congress hasn't been able to transfer hundreds of billions in wealth to the 0.1%.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)And that would mean double jeopardy for Trump.