Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,065 posts)
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:02 PM May 2017

Reuters: White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation: sources


Politics | Fri May 19, 2017 | 6:01pm EDT
White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation: sources
By Julia Edwards Ainsley | WASHINGTON


The Trump administration is exploring whether it can use an obscure ethics rule to undermine the special counsel investigation into ties between President Donald Trump's campaign team and Russia, two people familiar with White House thinking said on Friday.

Trump has said that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's hiring of former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to lead the investigation "hurts our country terribly."

Within hours of Mueller's appointment on Wednesday, the White House began reviewing the Code of Federal Regulations, which restricts newly hired government lawyers from investigating their prior law firm’s clients for one year after their hiring, the sources said.

An executive order signed by Trump in January extended that period to two years.

Mueller's former law firm, WilmerHale, represents Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, who met with a Russian bank executive in December, and the president's former campaign manager Paul Manafort, who is a subject of a federal investigation.

Legal experts said the ethics rule can be waived by the Justice Department, which appointed Mueller. He did not represent Kushner or Manafort directly at his former law firm.

If the department did not grant a waiver, Mueller would be barred from investigating Kushner or Manafort, and this could greatly diminish the scope of the probe, experts said.

The Justice Department is already reviewing Mueller's background as well as any potential conflicts of interest, said department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores.

more...

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-mueller-idUSKCN18F2KK?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=591f731604d3011bf3a777fa&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reuters: White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation: sources (Original Post) babylonsister May 2017 OP
OH! represents Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, elleng May 2017 #1
Mueller didn't represent Kushner. emulatorloo May 2017 #11
I'm not 'excited,' elleng May 2017 #14
No offense, your quote seems like yr apparently buying White House spin. emulatorloo May 2017 #15
I'm a lawyer, I 'tow the line' of the law, elleng May 2017 #18
As a lawyer, I'm sure you have seen guilty parties desperately smearing law enforcement emulatorloo May 2017 #19
Yes, of course guilty parties smear law enforcement. elleng May 2017 #20
I find the White House claims of 'conflict of interest' disingenuous emulatorloo May 2017 #22
This makes me insane luvMIdog May 2017 #2
Try and they'll drag the entire family out by their hair to a waiting prison van. NightWatcher May 2017 #3
You go ! I double that dare ! nocalflea May 2017 #26
LOL now why would folks not guilty be doing this? Thrill May 2017 #4
That is an astute observation. Why indeed?! nt babylonsister May 2017 #6
More proof Trump is scared about Mueller uncovering the truth n/t emulatorloo May 2017 #12
Can't Mueller just hire someone greymattermom May 2017 #5
Rosenstein can just give him a waiver if he wants to. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #8
As article points out Mueller didn't represent Manafort or Kushner emulatorloo May 2017 #10
The optics would be awful and just invite more scrutiny. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #16
Agreed. There's something so dishonest and disingenuous about this move too. emulatorloo May 2017 #25
Precisely. The law exists because of the fear the independent counsel will show favoritism.... DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #28
"We're totally innocent...no collision.... Docreed2003 May 2017 #7
Maybe Trump should have read the executive order Doodley May 2017 #9
But the DoJ can waive that rule. Laffy Kat May 2017 #13
Well if they're going to such lengths to mess up the investigations malaise May 2017 #17
The EO was likely written with the New FBI director in mind... a 2 year No investigation window for MedusaX May 2017 #21
Couldn't they just hire someone else to look into maxrandb May 2017 #23
Oh yeah, this investigation really hurts. Ilsa May 2017 #24
A 2nd Special Prosecutor would be appointed just for Jared. Duppers May 2017 #27

emulatorloo

(44,124 posts)
11. Mueller didn't represent Kushner.
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:18 PM
May 2017

Don't get too excited.

This actually proves how scared Trump is of what Mueller will find.

elleng

(130,901 posts)
14. I'm not 'excited,'
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:22 PM
May 2017

I'm noting possible issues/conflicts.

'Within hours of Mueller's appointment on Wednesday, the White House began reviewing the Code of Federal Regulations, which restricts newly hired government lawyers from investigating their prior law firm’s clients for one year after their hiring, the sources said.

An executive order signed by Trump in January extended that period to two years.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-mueller-idUSKCN18F2KK

emulatorloo

(44,124 posts)
15. No offense, your quote seems like yr apparently buying White House spin.
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:25 PM
May 2017

that Mueller is 'corrupt'.

Mueller has a stellar reputation. The White House doesn't. This is a dishonest effort on their part to smear Mueller.

If I'm mistaken I apologize.

elleng

(130,901 posts)
18. I'm a lawyer, I 'tow the line' of the law,
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:28 PM
May 2017

I recognize it's often confusing and conflicted, and takes TIME to sort out.

emulatorloo

(44,124 posts)
19. As a lawyer, I'm sure you have seen guilty parties desperately smearing law enforcement
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:30 PM
May 2017

Which is what Trump Co is doing.

emulatorloo

(44,124 posts)
22. I find the White House claims of 'conflict of interest' disingenuous
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:34 PM
May 2017

and self-serving. I suspect Rosenstein may consider that as he moves forward.

YMMV

Have a great night!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
8. Rosenstein can just give him a waiver if he wants to.
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:11 PM
May 2017

Trump can fire Rosenstein for giving the waiver. This would just invite more problems for him.

emulatorloo

(44,124 posts)
10. As article points out Mueller didn't represent Manafort or Kushner
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:15 PM
May 2017

And as DSB points out, DOJ's Rosenstein can give him a waiver.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
16. The optics would be awful and just invite more scrutiny.
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:27 PM
May 2017

You can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. Mueller gets to investigate who he wants. If Chump tries to circumscribe who he investigates he further seals his fate.

emulatorloo

(44,124 posts)
25. Agreed. There's something so dishonest and disingenuous about this move too.
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:55 PM
May 2017

I can't quite articulate it but I'll give it a go:

They are claiming he is unethical because his firm represents Kushner and Manafort.

Most people would assume that means Mueller's gonna go easy on Trump.

This move is as dishonest/phony as when they claimed Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
28. Precisely. The law exists because of the fear the independent counsel will show favoritism....
Sat May 20, 2017, 01:31 AM
May 2017

Precisely. The laws exists because of the fear the independent counsel will show favoritism, not that he will be too harsh.

malaise

(268,997 posts)
17. Well if they're going to such lengths to mess up the investigations
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:28 PM
May 2017

they must be really guilty of collusion - LOCK THEM UP!

MedusaX

(1,129 posts)
21. The EO was likely written with the New FBI director in mind... a 2 year No investigation window for
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:33 PM
May 2017

Any one hired who was formerly associated with a law firm which represented any Trumpster...

Of course no one at WH has looked into any similar ethics issues regarding their pal Lieberman's possible FBI gig....

Even though technically FBI director is not being hired as "counsel / attny" you can bet your skivvies that 45 would use the EO to squash any unfriendly investigations by FBI........

maxrandb

(15,330 posts)
23. Couldn't they just hire someone else to look into
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:35 PM
May 2017

Brooks Brothers Spice?

I think Hillary has a law degree and is not too busy right now

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
24. Oh yeah, this investigation really hurts.
Fri May 19, 2017, 07:43 PM
May 2017

I can't sleep at night knowing Congress hasn't been able to transfer hundreds of billions in wealth to the 0.1%.

Duppers

(28,120 posts)
27. A 2nd Special Prosecutor would be appointed just for Jared.
Sat May 20, 2017, 12:32 AM
May 2017

And that would mean double jeopardy for Trump.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reuters: White House loo...