General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoseph Stiglitz: Jail the bankers
Stiglitz was in London and did an interview with The Independent:
"It's a textbook illustration," Stiglitz said. "Where there are these asymmetries a lot of these activities are directed at rent seeking [appropriating resources from someone else rather than creating new wealth]. That was one of my original points. It wasn't about productivity, it was taking advantage."
Yet Stiglitz's interest in the abuses of banks extends beyond the academic. He argues that breaking the economic and political power that has been amassed by the financial sector in recent decades, especially in the US and the UK, is essential if we are to build a more just and prosperous society. The first step, he says, is sending some bankers to jail. " That ought to change. That means legislation. Banks and others have engaged in rent seeking, creating inequality, ripping off other people, and none of them have gone to jail."
<snip>
"Every economy needs lots of public investments roads, technology, education," he says. "In a democracy you're going to get more of those investments if you have more equity. Because as societies get divided, the rich worry that you will use the power of the state to redistribute. They therefore want to restrict the power of the state so you wind up with weaker states, weaker public investments and weaker growth."
Stiglitz goes on to say that the politicians need to stop listening to the damn financial lobbyists (okay, he didn't say damn....I did ) and displaying their economic ignorance by insisting more regulations on the banksters will hurt the economy.
Read it at The Independent (UK)-- it's Stiglitz.
Joseph Stiglitz: Man who ran World Bank calls for bankers to face the music
Joseph Stiglitz tells Ben Chu that rogue financiers have proven that regulation must get tougher
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)financially ruined this country?
We don't even have politicians that will step up and criticize the banksters.
msongs
(67,405 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)They need their wealth expropriated.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)If they sit in jail for a couple of years and then return to 400 million dollars, all their corruption has paid off and others will keep on doing it.
Only if they lose their ill gotten gains will it begin to be a deterrent to future corruptigators.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)second term. Along with all the others who got it right, like Dean Baker, Galbraith, Krugman. Time to get rid of those who got it wrong and have spent their time trying to cover the corruption, rather than stimulate the economy for the people.
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)I don't want to see rethugs defunding law enforcement anymore. Defunding the white collar crime division sends the message that the rethugs want to give the criminals free rein to rule and there isn't a damn thing law-abiding citizens can do about it.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)malaise
(268,997 posts)Throw away some of the keys
kitt6
(516 posts)too put the breaks on Mitt and the complete fraud of this election.
pansypoo53219
(20,976 posts)then, take ALL THEIR ILL-GOTTEN GAINS. if we can live on poverty wages, so can they. LET THEM EAT RAMEN!
pansypoo53219
(20,976 posts)take away their keys to the game.
hay rick
(7,611 posts)Give the next generation of bankers something that they can understand to think about.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)tpsbmam
(3,927 posts)Then along comes Joseph Stiglitz -- a dangerous man, an insider who defected.
Stiglitz, an owlish intellectual who reminds audiences of Richard Dreyfuss, probably won't win the Nobel Prize in economics when it is announced this week. But he has earned every other distinction in the field -- a Ph.D. from MIT; the top prize for young economists from the American Economic Association; faculty positions at Yale, Princeton and Stanford. In 1995 he became chairman of President Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers and in 1997 chief economist for the World Bank.
(LOL -- he did win the Nobel Prize.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2006
Stiglitz caused controversy in October 2001 when he exposed rampant corruption within the IMF and blew the whistle on their nefarious methods of inducing countries to fall under their debt before stripping them of sovereignty and hollowing out their economies.
Speaking on the nationally syndicated Alex Jones radio show, Stiglitz defined the process of globalization as a system that was "rigged against the poor countries, rigged for the advanced industrial countries - the result of that is there were an awful lot of losers."
The Columbia University Professor described how rampant privatization has crippled Mexico, in particular citing the sell-off of major infrastructure such as roads.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And many, many more -- a simple Google search will further your education.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)the conclusions you've lept to.
stiglitz is a banker. fact. i didn't need your lecture or your history, especially a history that quotes the fucking alex jones show.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Its as if a bank robber signs an agreement to pay Justice a cut in his robberies and gets off scott free.
Signed agreement stating DoJ will not prosecute Barclay's criminally for LIBOR manipulation, LIEBORGATE
http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/documents/Barclaysagreement.pdf
bvar22
(39,909 posts)..and our Justice Department will be on them faster than a Duck on a June Bug.