Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe White House is fueling anti-abortion extremism
Preston Mitchum
May 31
The White House is fueling anti-abortion extremism
Eight years after the murder of George Tiller, the Trump administration is promoting the same views that led to his death.
On May 31, 2009, Scott Roeder killed Dr. George Tiller, a late-term abortion provider, in Wichita, Kansas. By all accounts, Roeder waited in the pews of Tillers church, and then following service, he walked into the church foyer and shot him directly in the forehead. Roeder, who was staunchly anti-abortion, committed murder because of Tillers national prominence as an abortion provider. Now, eight years later, the country is recreating and expanding the same environment of extremist views that allowed for Tillers murder.
Since Trump came into office, his administration and the Republican-majority Congress have been on a mission to impede the rights of people especially women, girls, and their providers from accessing constitutionally protected health care services. Earlier this month, the House passed the American Health Care Act (AHCA) of 2017 which Trump vehemently supported. The AHCA disproportionately targets women: domestic abuse, rape, pregnancy, C-section, and maternity care can all be considered preexisting conditions. Less than two weeks later, Trump expanded the Mexico City Policy, also known as the Global Gag Rule (GGR), a death wish for women around the world seeking abortion services. The GGR, newly named Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance, says that foreign aid can go only to organizations abroad that neither perform nor actively promote abortion as a method of family planning. The rule could affect up to $9 billion in funding that is also used to combat health concerns like HIV/AIDS, Zika, and more.
Trump, an accused sexual assault perpetrator, has always promoted violence and hatred against women, including being able to access safe and legal abortions without criminal prosecution. During his candidacy, Trump said that women who seek abortions should be subject to some form of punishment if the procedure was banned in the United States. Trump eventually changed his mind (his fourth position on abortion in just three days) and claimed that only the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman. Nonetheless, this position still leaves abortion providers on the hook for performing a medical procedure that should be decided on by only a doctor and their patient. This kind of rhetoric would only embolden people like Roeder.
Allowing extreme policies against reproductive rights will increase the numbers of unintended pregnancies, which will increase the number of unsafe abortions. If pregnant peoples rights to immediate services are curtailed, this will undoubtedly cause a delay in options. As a delay continues, so does the potential for an unwanted pregnancy which could cause seeking a late-term abortion the same abortions performed by the late Tiller. That, in turn, allows people who are like Roeder to effectuate their extremist views on those seeking healthcare services, including but not limited to abortion and family planning options.
more...
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-administration-extreme-views-abortion-e0999c390265
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 448 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The White House is fueling anti-abortion extremism (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2017
OP
CrispyQ
(36,464 posts)1. Where's the woman empowering Ivanka, on this issue?
My bad. There's no profit in advocating for women's reproductive rights. If Planned Parenthood would just sell her handbags & shoes at their clinics, maybe they could continue to fund it?
I am so sick of (mostly) old, white men sticking their nose in this issue, that is none of their business!