General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachael Maddow is on the cover of Rolling Stone. Great Interview
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/rachel-maddow-the-rolling-stone-interview-w487750BainsBane
(53,032 posts)amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)I LOVE it!
Good for Rachel.
onecent
(6,096 posts)Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Costume they put on her for TV: contact lenses, makeup, hair parted and styled conservatively, not trendy. Her natural look is a good one. She's a very attractive woman.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)Long blonde hair. I would never recognize her
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)mucifer
(23,542 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,962 posts)dmr
(28,347 posts)Yea, as someone alluded upthread, Hannity will be so pissed. Haha!
Hannity's made out if vile bile. Rachel is modest and honest.
BumRushDaShow
(128,962 posts)is somehow a ratings grabber. Seems "snowflakey" to me.
He's been on a cover.... the RW loon one!
dmr
(28,347 posts)A stomach turning kind of guy, doncha think?
BumRushDaShow
(128,962 posts)YCHDT
(962 posts)Towlie
(5,324 posts)"Who do you see as a great interviewer?"
"You know who I think is amazing? Chris Matthews. And I know that sounds weird, because he's famous for interrupting people. But he interrupts people because he's listening so hard to them. He knows where people are going and he jumps in to get more out of them. The times I've seen Chris interview Trump were the most illuminating interviews with him I've ever seen, because he was able to draw more stuff out of Trump than anyone else."
Sorry Rachel, but I just can't hack those interruptions. I doesn't matter what he gets out of someone if I can't hear it.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)Ok then.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I wouldn't want anyone to judge you by your worst mistake.
I haven't glorified a terrorist in my time thank goodness for that. We know how difficult it can be to walk a line that perfect.
Just the other day my coworker accidentally bragged about ISIS but hey, we're not all perfect are we?
That was all sarcasm by the way.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Because they used an actual photo of the scum? Tell me, what exactly that article they wrote can be defined as glorifying?
retrowire
(10,345 posts)It made him look like a rock star.
Profific artists and significant people make that cover. Why a terrorist?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)and a large sporting event was targeted. So you object to the picture that was used or was there something IN the article that you would describe as glorifying?
retrowire
(10,345 posts)MFM008
(19,808 posts)But TWEETY?
he interviews himself. Even he can't get a word in edgewise....
FreeStateDemocrat
(2,654 posts)makes her sound very elitist. She seems the sort that found the Trump phenomena to be "fascinating" because it was not about to wreck her life of access and wealth but would continue to create great content for her show. I'll pass on deifying this one, so that she can keep cashing the big check and living the dream while others are the victims of really bad candidates that our media allow to get elected unchallenged. Yea, I know she has spoken up, as long as it did not jeopardize her cushy lifestyle. Another media personality that targets an audience, Rodger Ailes indeed! These people will change with drop of a hat if it keeps them getting on magazine covers.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)She doesn't pass your purity test. Oh well.
chillfactor
(7,575 posts)Rachel and Lawrence are the most intelligent and respected journalists out there. Their research is second to none. Their programs are loaded with amazing stories. Too bad that there are some posters on DU that do not have the intelligence to recognize that.