Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

superpatriotman

(6,253 posts) Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:41 PM Jun 2017

The louder they scream "No collusion!"

The more I think that yeah, maybe there was collusion.

That whole side of the aisle from the stinking head on down is acting very guilty.

I hope the truth comes out in the wash before they unplug the washing machine.

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The louder they scream "No collusion!" (Original Post) superpatriotman Jun 2017 OP

People with guilt would not protest an investigation kimbutgar Jun 2017 #1

Whenever They Assert "There Was No Collusion" Citing No Evidence To Back It Up, Just Respond..... ChoppinBroccoli Jun 2017 #2

kimbutgar

(21,226 posts)

1. People with guilt would not protest an investigation

Reply to superpatriotman (Original post)

Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:49 PM

Jun 2017

Me thinks they protest too much for a reason.

ChoppinBroccoli

(3,784 posts)

2. Whenever They Assert "There Was No Collusion" Citing No Evidence To Back It Up, Just Respond.....

Reply to superpatriotman (Original post)

Wed Jun 14, 2017, 11:31 PM

Jun 2017

...........something of this magnitude could not have been pulled off WITHOUT collusion. And since they never cite any evidence for their assertion that there was no collusion, you don't need to cite any evidence for this response.

Reply to this discussion