Clairvoyant Court Dismisses Trump Lawsuit Before Filing

[laserhaas]

You won't believe your eyes. The Washington D.C. Federal Court prematurely Ordered the end of a lawsuit against Trump (and top officials of USAG, FBI, SEC) who was sued to block Jay Clayton nomination to be head of S.E.C.

The court acting as if psyhic, dismissed the case weeks before it was officially put into the docket record.




As alleged, Jay Clayton is directly linked to Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Sullivan & Cromwell law firm (whom moi alleges is connected to eToys racketeering cases); and the lawsuit sought a TRO until the racketeering facts could be addressed.

As is plain to see by the docket record, the papers were "entered" on May 24th, after being clocked in on May 9th; (which begs the question - where dud the clerk of court put the clocked in papers - for 2 weeks).

Taking the enigmatic to the Twilight Zone realm of backwardness, the court jumped the hooch of the case that wasn't opened until May 24th..

....by Ordering case dismissed on May 5th!

Do...do..dood...doot...

Link to tweet

[br][hr][br]

A Clerk of Court is required by law to docket a case upon reception.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_79


As the docket shows (misrepresents) it states the case was filed May 9th. But this is contradicted by the court's docket that notes the papers were received March 22nd.

Also bizarre is a strange connotation upon the belated clicked in papers ....stipulating "F-Deck"

Hmmmmm, U wonder what "F-Deck" means?

[br]

2 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Never seen stuff this corrupt before
	0 (0%)
	Its about GSachs and Bain Cap. Who are Above the Law
	0 (0%)
	Amazing they even bothered to docket it
	0 (0%)
	How can one appeal a case in the Twight Zone
	0 (0%)
	Der Donald has really good courts
	0 (0%)
	If it's appealled, will it go to Trump's sister in 3rd Circut
	0 (0%)
	Oligarchs can get away with anything
	0 (0%)
	This Sucks
	0 (0%)
	All of the above
	1 (50%)
	Laser is from Twilight Zone and case us proper
	1 (50%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[laserhaas]

1. Clerks of Court are forbidden, by law, from doing thus

But there's a local "pro se" instruction (Unconstitutional) that states pro se filings may be withheld up to 6 weeks.

The D.C. Clerk of Court emailed multiple times, changing excuses to justify the reasons why.

One pathetic excuse stipulated I failed to provide a case number; to which l responded that the Clerk is the one at fault as the one who failed to docket the case and create a case number.

The fact the docket now corroborates the bizarro dynamics ....is mindboggling.

[laserhaas]

2. So where are the anti-Laser gangs who argue my cases

have no legal rights?

Will you cone out of your shells to argue this chit is kosher?

[laserhaas]

3. By the way, it is against the law for clerks to tamper

A clerk is like a machine of the court, having no (lawful) rights to block csses from being filed.

When the clerk told me they had to "wait and see" if I was poor (ruling my affidavit of such as invalid), I asked him

"how are you going to do that"?

Do they open an FBI file?

Start an IRS investigation?

Or do they hire a private investigator?

just sayin....

[laserhaas]

4. The specific law making it criminal for clerks refusing

We can't have Republican Clerks refusing to file marriage alplications...much less federal court lawsuits v Trump

This is The LAW

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2076

Whoever, being a clerk of a district court of the United States, willfully refuses or neglects to make or forward any report, certificate, statement, or document as required by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both

.

[laserhaas]

5. Wonder how to file a "timely" appeal

In an"untimely" case?!?!?!

[laserhaas]

6. Suprise coming.

Can't appeal a case dismissed months prior to being informed case closed.

But you can amend complaint when times are queer