Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 03:58 PM Jun 2017

The Best Defense Policy for the US...

... is NOT spending a trillion dollars a year on contracts and military toys.

The best defense policy for our country is a well-educated populace, that has access to great healthcare, and works to create the largest middle-class in the world.

Also, the best defense policy would have a great transportation system with the most modern infrastructure.

This would make us stronger than all the weapons in the world.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
2. We have enough weapons to blow up the world several times over.
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 04:47 PM
Jun 2017

We have our troops and military spread around the world.

As our infrastructure deteriorates to 3rd World status, with one of worst-educated populations in the world, without the political courage to offer the best healthcare for our people, it weakens us as a nation, even with the strongest military on earth.

What would we be fighting for if we were in a "hot war"?

EX500rider

(10,847 posts)
3. "What would we be fighting for if we were in a "hot war""
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 05:21 PM
Jun 2017

To prevent losing or annihilation from countries with even worse infrastructure/healthcare/education?

Should we spend more on those? Yes
Could we spend less on defense? Yes

But none of those things will stop or win a war with another large country.

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
4. Eisenhower signed the Interstate Highway bill as part of our national defense system.
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 05:28 PM
Jun 2017

Infrastructure is a big part of defense. Yes, we probably spend too much on weapons when we spend more than any other country in world, several times over? That does not make us stronger, in my opinion. It makes us weaker.

If we had to use those weapons, there would be nothing left. What would we have won??

EX500rider

(10,847 posts)
5. "What would we have won??"
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 05:32 PM
Jun 2017

Well if a strong nuclear umbrella prevents another country from nuking all our cities I'd say we prevented the annihilation of most of our populace and productive infrastructure.

If we lost a war to China and Russia I don't see a upside.

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
6. That is assuming that another country would attack us, knowing they would be annihilated and..
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 05:46 PM
Jun 2017

..that they could not get thru our "nuclear umbrella" ?? I don't know...

I guess I tend to agree with the fellow that said if America was ever defeated, it would be from within, not from without. Was that Lincoln? Jefferson? Or Someone Else?

I think we do indeed spend too much on "defense" and "offense" weaponry. I think that should be part of the Democratic platform.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Best Defense Policy f...