Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEPA intends to form red team to debate climate science
ARS TechnicaUS Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt and Energy Secretary Rick Perry have been making some headlines for publicly rejecting the conclusions of climate science. But in between wrongly claiming that climate scientists just dont know how much of a contribution humans make to recent global warming (answer: roughly 100 percent), they have also been parroting a new linethat climate science needs a red team to take on the scientific consensus.
On Friday, E&E News reported that these arent empty words. The EPA intends to organize a specific process in which these individuals... provide back-and-forth critique of specific new reports on climate science," according to an administration official.
Of course, thats not really a reasonable way to discover how evidence built a consensus in a field (a simple search of Google Scholar would be more helpful), and its not the way science works. Thousands of scientists around the world are constantly carrying out studies on climate change and submitting their results to be reviewed for flaws by other researchers before things are published in scientific journals. Other researchers can then test similar hypotheses with studies of their own.
Climate red teams have been coming up in Senate and House committee hearings, where they're often suggested by scientists from a small contrarian group. Since their opinions haven't gotten the sort of evidentiary support that would give them traction in the scientific community, they argue for the use of red teams that would elevate their views regardless. If the EPA does put together a red team, it is extremely likely that it would be made up of these same people.
E&E News also reports that coal executive Robert Murray (the same Robert Murray who recently sued HBO host John Oliver) hopes the effort will ultimately result in the EPA overturning the endangerment finding that gives the agency a mandate to regulate carbon dioxide. However, Pruitt has reportedly pumped the brakes on this idea in the past, which is a tall task given the legal and scientific hurdles.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1425 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA intends to form red team to debate climate science (Original Post)
Jimbo101
Jun 2017
OP
american_ideals
(613 posts)1. Just watch Merchants of Doubt
hatrack
(59,602 posts)2. I can see the sequel already - "Professional Suicide Squad"
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)3. Whenever the truth sucks for your side
Come up with some alternative facts to support your complete bullshit stance.