Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,065 posts)
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 06:49 PM Jul 2012

The New Jim Crow Comes to PA

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2012/7/10/11937/2250

The New Jim Crow Comes to PA

by BooMan
Tue Jul 10th, 2012 at 11:09:37 AM EST


snip//

An astounding 758,939 registered voters in the state, or nine percent, do not have PennDot IDs, according to data released last Tuesday by the Department of State. In Philadelphia, it's even worse: 186,830 registered voters, or 18 percent, do not have ID. Secretary of the Commonwealth Carol Aichele had previously assured lawmakers that 99 percent of Pennsylvanians possess the necessary ID―based on what, I have absolutely no idea.

The state released this astonishing data on July 3 in what seems like a transparent effort to ensure that the bomb-like news would drop like a dud on the July 4th holiday. And they did so with the almost-unbelievably-Orwellian title “Department of State and PennDOT Confirm Most Registered Voters Have Photo ID.”

Corbett has rebuffed a call from rights advocates and civic groups to delay voter ID implementation. But a legal challenge presses on. 93-year old Germantown resident Viviette Applewhite, who has been unable to obtain a Pennsylvania birth certificate, is the lead plaintiff in the ACLU and NAACP lawsuit. Other plaintiffs include “three elderly women who say they cannot obtain necessary ID because they were born in the Jim Crow South, where states have no records of their births.”


snip//

In 2008, Obama carried Pennsylvania by a little more than 600,000 votes. He netted 478,000 of those votes out of Philadelphia County. An 18% percent reduction in the Philadelphia County vote would be about 130,000 people who are disenfranchised . Obama carried 83% of the county vote, meaning that he'd lose about 108,000 votes, while Romney would theoretically lose about 22,000. However, at least 99% of Romney's votes in the county will be cast by people who have a valid driver's license or passport, so that 22,000 number will never happen.

The new voter ID law is intended to have this consequence. Under the pretense of fighting voter fraud that does not exist, they are eliminating tens of thousands of Democratic votes in Philadelphia alone. And many other states are implementing similar laws that all have the intention of disenfranchising legitimate Democratic voters. And these voters are overwhelmingly people of color, students who don't have a current address, and the elderly who don't drive and cannot locate the proper documents to obtain a state-issued photo ID.

If the intent of these laws to rig elections, the effect is racist and discriminatory, and should be illegal under the Voting Rights Act.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The New Jim Crow Comes to PA (Original Post) babylonsister Jul 2012 OP
Good discussion on now with Sharpton and malaise Jul 2012 #1
Yep, we're in big trouble here. MrSlayer Jul 2012 #2
From what I've read, the ongoning lawsuits will not happen in time. enough Jul 2012 #3
The ACLU one is scheduled for July 25 BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #4
Thank you! That is good news! (nt) enough Jul 2012 #6
We're all crossing our fingers here in Philly! n/t BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #8
Details on the ACLU lawsuit freeandequalpa Jul 2012 #9
Thanks. MrSlayer Jul 2012 #10
Voter ID, aka Jim Crow 2.0, violates the state constitution, too meow2u3 Jul 2012 #5
It's such a disgrace; really don't know how these fugly vote suppressors live with themselves BeyondGeography Jul 2012 #7
 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
2. Yep, we're in big trouble here.
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 06:53 PM
Jul 2012

If ID is upheld we lose this state, period. If we're depending on republicans to sit home because they hate Romney we're fooling ourselves.

ID must be struck down.

BumRushDaShow

(128,965 posts)
4. The ACLU one is scheduled for July 25
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 07:26 PM
Jul 2012
The ACLU and the Advancement Project are providing legal support for trying to have the law ruled a violation of the state constitution. A Commonwealth Court hearing is scheduled for July 25.

More: http://articles.philly.com/2012-07-08/news/32578418_1_voter-id-law-photo-id-requirement-penndot-id/2


Also

PHILADELPHIA (CBS) – The ACLU of Pennsylvania announced Thursday that its lawsuit over Pennsylvania’s new Voter ID law has a trial date.

Witold Walcvak is the legal director for the ACLU of Pennsylvania. He says the voter ID law will now have its day in court.

“We had our first meeting with the trial judge, Judge Robert Simpson. And he has scheduled us for a 5 to 7 day trial beginning on July 25th.”

More: http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/05/24/court-date-for-pennsylvanias-voter-id-law-set/

meow2u3

(24,764 posts)
5. Voter ID, aka Jim Crow 2.0, violates the state constitution, too
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 07:40 PM
Jul 2012

Two reasons:

Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Article I. Declaration of Rights
Current selection§ 5. Elections


Elections shall be free and equal; and no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage.

http://weblinks.westlaw.com/result/default.aspx?cite=UUID%28N65192F9034-4811DA8A989-F4EECDB8638%29&db=1000427&findtype=VQ&fn=_top&pbc=DA010192&rlt=CLID_FQRLT4404203418107&rp=%2FSearch%2Fdefault.wl&rs=WEBL12.04&service=Find&spa=pac-1000&sr=TC&vr=2.0

Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Article VII. Elections
Current selection§ 1. Qualifications of electors


Every citizen twenty-one years of age, possessing the following qualifications, shall be entitled to vote at all elections subject, however, to such laws requiring and regulating the registration of electors as the General Assembly may enact.

1. He or she shall have been a citizen of the United States at least one month.

2. He or she shall have resided in the State ninety (90) days immediately preceding the election.

3. He or she shall have resided in the election district where he or she shall offer to vote at least sixty (60) days immediately preceding the election, except that if qualified to vote in an election district prior to removal of residence, he or she may, if a resident of Pennsylvania, vote in the election district from which he or she removed his or her residence within sixty (60) days preceding the election.

CREDIT(S)

Amended Nov. 5, 1901; Nov. 7, 1933; Nov. 3, 1959. Renumbered from Art. 8, § 1 and amended May 16, 1967.


http://weblinks.westlaw.com/result/default.aspx?cite=UUID%28N64BFEC0034-4811DA8A989-F4EECDB8638%29&db=1000427&findtype=VQ&fn=_top&pbc=DA010192&rlt=CLID_FQRLT52804113618107&rp=%2FSearch%2Fdefault.wl&rs=WEBL12.04&service=Find&spa=pac-1000&sr=TC&vr=2.0

I don't see one clause requiring government-acceptable photo ID as a condition for voting in the Pennsylvania Constitution. The ACLU and the other plaintiffs have a good chance of winning, provided the judge wasn't bought off.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The New Jim Crow Comes to...