Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 01:02 PM Jul 2012

Romney's unpleasant visit with the NAACP

Romney's unpleasant visit with the NAACP

By Steve Benen

<...>

So, when Mitt Romney agreed to speak this morning, it was hardly a foregone conclusion that his remarks would go over poorly. Sure, he antagonized the NAACP in Massachusetts during his one term as governor. And sure, Romney's right-wing policy agenda would disproportionately hurt African Americans. And sure, Romney's party is engaged in a systematic effort to prevent African-American voters from participating in the 2012 elections.

But Romney nevertheless could have stressed areas of agreement and made his case for why his far-right proposals would help the African-American community. Instead, the Republican chose a different path.

<...>

I've been following NAACP conventions for quite a while now, and I can't recall ever hearing such a lengthy, sustained booing. (The rest of the speech received polite applause, but the booing was obviously the most notable development of the morning.)

The wonk in me feels compelled to mention that Romney's argument wasn't even coherent on its face -- he said he wants to kill the Affordable Care Act to reduce the deficit, which is absurd since killing the Affordable Care Act would increase the deficit.

- more -

http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/11/12683715-romneys-unpleasant-visit-with-the-naacp


Romney Supports Voter ID Laws That Could Disenfranchise 25% Of African Americans
http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/07/11/514412/romney-supports-voter-id-laws-that-could-disenfranchise-25-of-african-americans/

Romney believes he's just misunderstood, see: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002930373
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney's unpleasant visit with the NAACP (Original Post) ProSense Jul 2012 OP
K & R. n/t FSogol Jul 2012 #1
Kick! n/t ProSense Jul 2012 #2
IMO the whole performance was a calculated appeal to his "base" tularetom Jul 2012 #3
Maybe, ProSense Jul 2012 #4
No, I think he went to mollify independents. Think it worked? aquart Jul 2012 #13
BINGO!!!! Kahuna Jul 2012 #17
But the campaign probably felt he couldn't afford not to go for the sake of appearances RZM Jul 2012 #7
I concur. Dogwhistle to the racist wing of the Repigs. If the coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #9
See my post above RZM Jul 2012 #11
I'm not giving Romeny one ounce of credit for this. If he was coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #18
I'm convinced the Obama campaign helped staff his campaign. I mean, really. That audience, includi monmouth Jul 2012 #5
Comment Jack Rabbit Jul 2012 #6
+1 uponit7771 Jul 2012 #12
Sounds like... Ron Obvious Jul 2012 #8
The look on his face during the booing was priceless. Puglover Jul 2012 #10
Did he ever use the phrase "you people"? Hugabear Jul 2012 #14
Even Shrub got a polite reception in 2006 at the NAACP Convention BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #15
An unpleasant time was had by all. magnifisense Jul 2012 #16
This in-your-face speech was intended to gain favor with the extreme right base aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2012 #19
Did You Notice Romney's Expression DallasNE Jul 2012 #20

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
3. IMO the whole performance was a calculated appeal to his "base"
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 01:20 PM
Jul 2012

The lunatic fringe is still very skeptical that he is one of them. They know about Romneycare and they automatically suspect him because he was governor of the Massachussetts SSR.

But if he goes to a convention of one of the largest African American organizations in the US and gets the audience to boo him he will automatically gain credibility with the racists he needs so desperately to get on his side.

"Boy howdy did you see all them n-words booing Romney? He really put 'em in their place. If we elect him president he won't take no shit of them. Yee haw"

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. Maybe,
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 01:34 PM
Jul 2012

"IMO the whole performance was a calculated appeal to his 'base'"

...but the majority of voters are not his base, and they will see this for what it is: another clueless Romney moment.

He desperately needs the wingnuts, but he only turns off sane people in his attempts to appeal to them.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
7. But the campaign probably felt he couldn't afford not to go for the sake of appearances
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 02:15 PM
Jul 2012

That's assuming the NAACP invited him (I think they did, but I'm not sure).

Had he turned them down, that would have looked worse than being booed.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
9. I concur. Dogwhistle to the racist wing of the Repigs. If the
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 02:17 PM
Jul 2012

NAACP is booing Mitt, it must mean he's against the N***ers (in the minds of the racist wing).

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
11. See my post above
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 02:31 PM
Jul 2012

If he hadn't gone, it might have been worse for him. It's pretty much a lose-lose.

He's was going to get it whether he went or not. People are going to have more respect for somebody who faces the music than somebody who runs away. Refusing to appear would have looked worse, IMO.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
18. I'm not giving Romeny one ounce of credit for this. If he was
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 04:29 PM
Jul 2012

truly afraid of the reception he would receive, his campaign could have pled 'scheduling conflicts.' It's done all the time when a candidate does not wish, for example, to appear with another candidate of the same party at the same event.

I think Romney figured by going, he would get a negative reaction from those attending which, once publicized with a wink, wink, nod, nod, would energize his racist base.

No blacks or independents were going to vote for Romney because he appeared to 'face the music.' But a bunch of previously fence-sitting racists now have reason, if they still needed it, to pull the lever for the white guy in November.

Just my opinion of how a psychopathic slimebucket like Romney thinks and operates.

monmouth

(21,078 posts)
5. I'm convinced the Obama campaign helped staff his campaign. I mean, really. That audience, includi
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 01:37 PM
Jul 2012

ng the two or three white guys there looked like they were waiting for a root canal.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
6. Comment
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 02:12 PM
Jul 2012

Last edited Wed Jul 11, 2012, 03:40 PM - Edit history (1)

For crying out loud, of course Romney got booed. At the risk of being overly cynical, I can't help but wonder if Romney did this on purpose precisely so he would be booed . . . .

Indeed, if I had to guess, I'd say Romney will now position himself as something of a victim -- he appeared in good faith, the argument goes, but that mean ol' NAACP audience booed him for standing by his beliefs.

That thought occurred to me, also. The Southern strategy has never gone away. It's still with us and the GOP does everything to reinforce white racism except hold their national convention in a farm field under a burning cross. Therefore, being booed by the NAACP is a badge of honor in the eyes of many Republican voters.

This is the crowd that believes those people (starts with n and rhymes with triggers) are lazy and stupid want to live on the government dole. The solution is to prevent them from voting, because, as right wing columnist Matthew Vadum said, registering the poor to vote is "like handing out burglary tools to criminals."

To call a horse a horse, the Republican party is racist and has been since the sixties. Today, the Koch brothers fund an attempt to elect segregationists to a North Carolina school board in a district that has been a model of working diversity; that kind of racism speaks for itself. Such people see the abolition of slavery as government infringement on the free market.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
10. The look on his face during the booing was priceless.
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 02:20 PM
Jul 2012
I honestly believe that Mittens probably needed to change his magic underwear after that speech.

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
14. Did he ever use the phrase "you people"?
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 02:39 PM
Jul 2012

Just curious. I can't bring myself to watch any of his speeches. Not only can I not stomach his message, but it would put me to sleep.

BumRushDaShow

(128,917 posts)
15. Even Shrub got a polite reception in 2006 at the NAACP Convention
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 02:44 PM
Jul 2012

despite the disgrace of Katrina the year before, but he never got booed like that.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13949974/ns/politics/t/bush-invokes-civil-rights-naacp-speech/

For all the DUers who claim that the booing "helps" Rmoney. Think again. Ask Caribou Barbie and McLame how much their plentiful distribution of bloody red meat "helped".

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
19. This in-your-face speech was intended to gain favor with the extreme right base
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 04:40 PM
Jul 2012

according to several commentators today on MSNBC. Failing to say anything positive about the first black President and failing to address important issues like Pell grants was a way of telling the extreme conservative nuts in his party "see, I'm not afraid of the coloreds and won't bend to their demands." He knows he won't get many black votes whatever he says, but this was about using the NAACP speech as a platform to stress his seriously conservative credentials with his cuckoo base.

And Martin Bashir just played a clip where Romney told Fox News he went there expecting to be booed. He suggested Romney went to the NAACP with a specific provocation in mind.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
20. Did You Notice Romney's Expression
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 05:24 PM
Jul 2012

During the booing. He seemed genuinely pleased at the reaction and had his canned response in the ready when it happened so, of course, he had this specific provocation in mind.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney's unpleasant visit...