Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 09:51 AM Jul 2017

I've never been a fan of the Carter program but I've glad he is well.

IMO, Habitat for Humanity, relies on free labor, leans hard on local business to supply lumber and hardware, and makes people jump through hoops and usually must be connected with an church, but Habitat for Humanity holds or controls the mortgage. It is a very low rate but it makes money and don't be late with the payment.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I've never been a fan of the Carter program but I've glad he is well. (Original Post) CK_John Jul 2017 OP
I learned a long time ago TexasProgresive Jul 2017 #1
Habitat owners do not receive houses for free unc70 Jul 2017 #2
Like they say, everyone is entitled to an opinion. BootinUp Jul 2017 #3

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
1. I learned a long time ago
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 09:55 AM
Jul 2017

that when people receive something for free they often have the opinion that it must be worthless.

unc70

(6,113 posts)
2. Habitat owners do not receive houses for free
Sat Jul 15, 2017, 10:19 AM
Jul 2017

They put in a lot of their own effort.

On your other point, while many churches and other religious organizations are involved with Habitat, so are many secular groups. Two groups widely involved are local Boards of Realtors and Hone Builder Associations.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I've never been a fan of ...