Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNuclear war would set off climate catastrophe
Climate News NetworkFour US scientists have just introduced one more good reason not to launch a nuclear war. It would not simply guarantee the mutual destruction of the participants. It would also precipitate catastrophic climate change.
And, they argue in the journal Environment Magazine, even a single nuclear missile strike could darken the skies, chill the atmosphere, stop rainfall, ruin harvests and cost a billion lives.
Observers with memories that stretch back to the Cold War and the arms race between the US and Nato powers on the one hand and the USSR on the other will know something of this already.
In 1983 the astronomer Carl Sagan and colleagues introduced the idea of global annihilation, or at least the end of human civilisation, in a nuclear winter as a consequence of a nuclear weapons exchange.
Years later, as the Soviet Union collapsed and the Russian Federation was born, the same scientists did their calculations again, and reduced the threat to a kind of nuclear autumn.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1321 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nuclear war would set off climate catastrophe (Original Post)
Jimbo101
Jul 2017
OP
2654 Nuclear detonations, Several hundred above ground, including the 50-MT Tsar Bomb.
TheBlackAdder
Jul 2017
#2
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)1. Humans have proven they dont deserve the earth, time for us to be shed.
TheBlackAdder
(28,189 posts)2. 2654 Nuclear detonations, Several hundred above ground, including the 50-MT Tsar Bomb.
NickB79
(19,236 posts)4. So how are we not all dead yet?
The researchers in the article claim a single Hiroshima-sized bomb could starve a billion people, yet we've detonated hundreds so far? What's changed?
crosinski
(411 posts)6. It depends on where that bomb falls. n/t
Girard442
(6,070 posts)3. Kinda ironic that climate catastrophe could also trigger nuclear war.
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)7. +100. I was just going to add that, and I saw your comment.
That escape hatch over there is starting to look awful small...
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)5. WTF? If warheads start flying, the climate is the least of our worries
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)8. Yeah given that thousands of bombs have already been detonated I am doubting this
A video of all through 2010, a few more have happened since then.
And even in their smoke from a city scenario, I doubt that would be a bigger effect than some of the major volcanoes that have erupted.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)9. Was this published in this week's No Shit Journal?
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)10. MAD
Those not killed immediately will envy the dead.