Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(52,160 posts)
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 04:08 PM Jul 2017

To put the coverage of Simpson today in perspective

http://www.businessinsider.com/evening-news-election-2016-10

During the entire campaign from June until late October Hillary Clinton got 89 minutes of coverage on all three networks news broadcasts. Issues as a whole got 32 minutes (no that is not a typo).

With less than two weeks to go before Election Day, nightly newscasts have spent 17 minutes covering terrorism; seven minutes on unrest in the Middle East in areas like Syria, Iraq, and Israel, and the rise of the Islamic State; and they have mentioned issues like LGBT rights, policing, and immigration only in passing, the report said.

Issues that have gotten minimal or no coverage include drugs, healthcare, poverty, gun control, and climate change. And if these issues were mentioned, "it has been on the candidates' terms, not the networks' initiatives," the report said.

Assuming that OJ was given a hour on the three networks today he got 3 hours just today. That is nearly six times the coverage all issues got in the three to four months of the election and over twice the coverage that Clinton got.

If you wonder why the public is ignorant of what is going on, that is one big reason why.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To put the coverage of Simpson today in perspective (Original Post) dsc Jul 2017 OP
Incredible underpants Jul 2017 #1
K & R 50 Shades Of Blue Jul 2017 #2
recommended H2O Man Jul 2017 #3
There was more video of OJ today than there has been WH Press Briefings HipChick Jul 2017 #4
DURec leftstreet Jul 2017 #5
Difficult to blame the networks for what we demand. LanternWaste Jul 2017 #6
Wow. cwydro Jul 2017 #7
K & R..... LovingA2andMI Jul 2017 #8
This is why I don't waste my time watching network TV news. FuzzyRabbit Jul 2017 #9
Broadcast news is worse than useless, it's harming this country Warpy Jul 2017 #10
Keen observation. Thanks for posting. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2017 #11
Ed Murrow and Walter Cronkite have left the building. VOX Jul 2017 #12
Picking at the scab ... Jopin Klobe Jul 2017 #13
Celebrity BumRushDaShow Jul 2017 #14
Interesting. off topic - nice to see you, dsc. salin Jul 2017 #15
great to see you as well. dsc Jul 2017 #20
I have no doubt why the public is ignorant. TeeVee poisons the mind. NRaleighLiberal Jul 2017 #16
Wow...simply amazing (in a horrible, non equitable way for Hillary) iluvtennis Jul 2017 #17
Let's see if this Simpsonian thread rises to the top at DU Chico Man Jul 2017 #18
actually the point isn't what we are watching but what is being programmed dsc Jul 2017 #21
Solution: STOP WATCHING Blue_Tires Jul 2017 #19
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
6. Difficult to blame the networks for what we demand.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 04:23 PM
Jul 2017

"If you wonder why the public is ignorant of what is going on, that is one big reason why..."

Ratings-driven content... the broadcasters simply give us what we will tune in for. If the public wanted news broadcasts designed to inform the electorate, we would receive than instead. But as long as we desire yelling over discussion, celebrity over policy, and simplistic, three-bullet point arguments over analysis, we have ourselves to blame.

It's a difficult argument to assign responsibility to the networks for what we collectively demand from them, for what drives the ratings and profits. Indeed... this afternoon's edition of General Discussion reflects this accurately with eleven OPs about the Mr Simpson on its front page.

FuzzyRabbit

(1,967 posts)
9. This is why I don't waste my time watching network TV news.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 04:54 PM
Jul 2017

There is barely any news at all on network news shows.

Warpy

(111,254 posts)
10. Broadcast news is worse than useless, it's harming this country
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 05:22 PM
Jul 2017

and it's not going to change until we make it unprofitable and we make it unprofitable by switching those blow dried bobbleheads and their infotainment off, along with their sponsors.

The only things worth watching on the evening news are the weather forecast (it has a chance of being right) and maybe the sports scores.

VOX

(22,976 posts)
12. Ed Murrow and Walter Cronkite have left the building.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 05:46 PM
Jul 2017

What's taken their place just doesn't come anywhere near a match. For-profit news is just that.

NRaleighLiberal

(60,014 posts)
16. I have no doubt why the public is ignorant. TeeVee poisons the mind.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 06:23 PM
Jul 2017

having turned it off nearly 10 years ago, if we are traveling and watch for a bit from a hotel, we have to turn it off immediately - it is toxic.

Chico Man

(3,001 posts)
18. Let's see if this Simpsonian thread rises to the top at DU
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 06:26 PM
Jul 2017

Why must we always be aghast with how American society consumes television media? It's getting less and less relevant..

dsc

(52,160 posts)
21. actually the point isn't what we are watching but what is being programmed
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 01:18 AM
Jul 2017

As recently as 2008 issues got about 7x as much coverage this isn't all the public's fault.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
19. Solution: STOP WATCHING
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 06:28 PM
Jul 2017

I screamed and yelled for a solid year for everyone to stop feeding the beast and keeping their TV on CNN all night and starting 20 new threads in GD every time Trump said something outrageous... Even before he was a serious primary contender, Trump was getting a solid 60-90 minutes of free coverage most nights, or more if he said something really batshit/racist/sexist...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»To put the coverage of Si...