Andrea Greenspan is interviewing BAY BUCHANAN about Romney's Bain lies. LIBERAL MEDIA RULES!

[Amerigo Vespucci]

Buchanan is quoting "independent shorsh ("source&quot after independent shorsh after independent shorsh" stating that Romney had "no active role whatsoever."

"What he said is the absolute truth. What is hurting the campaign is when the opposition distorts the truth."

She's PISSED that the Obama campaign is attacking Willard's "STELLAR RECORD."

[C_U_L8R]

1. Sounds like she's digging a deeper hole

Mitt is screwn.

[JoePhilly]

2. Two right wing dingbats.

[rufus dog]

3. fucking cool isn't it!

Bay has to go on to defend the Mittster.

My favorite was how he gets credit for Staples job creation by not for other management decisions after he left in 1999 or was it 2003.

[Drunken Irishman]

4. I don't have a problem with this...

They do need someone from the right to balance out the guests they've had just absolutely destroying Romney. Bay Buchanan is a dolt who isn't helping Romney's case in the least.

[aint_no_life_nowhere]

5. She needs to cut off about two feet of her chin and give it to M. McConnell

Buchanan was hilarious. Yes, Romney had ownership of Bain after 1999 but it didn't count if jobs were outsourced. But yeah, Mitt should take credit for any new American jobs created by Bain right up to the present day.

[HiPointDem]

6. alan greenspan's wife is interviewing bay buchanan on "liberal media"? rigged sideshow.

[RedStateLiberal]

7. Andrea is pathetic!

No pushback whatsoever on Buchanan's claims that Rmoney had no involvement in decisions made at Bain after 1999. How the hell does she know that? Because Rmoney says so? GIVE ME A BREAK!

[patrice]

8. So, Andrea, & Bay, & all of these "independent" sources have SEEN Willard's tax returns? Perhaps

THEY can tell us where Rmoney was living when he voted in that special election in Massachusetts in 2010.

[Amerigo Vespucci]

9. Earlier in the show, Andrea was asking...

...if Romney's time at the Olympics might mean he can say that he was not directly involved in the day-to-day affairs of running things, so he was telling the truth.

I'm to the point where I don't even know why I let Alex Wagner's show segue into Greenspan's. I need to start changing the channel daily.

[patrice]

10. I don't understand why that would even matter. What the f- is a CEO anyway? WHY do they "earn" the

BIG bucks? How many other CEOs out there don't do their jobs? - and most important - WHY. IS. THAT?