....for the life of me I can't remember where.
However, its a situation where the Constitution hasn't clearly defined the role between the different branches. For example, executive privilege. That's an area both Congress and Executive have been at odds with...but its never made it to the courts. And even if the SC does decide, it could still be challenged probably on a number of technicalities. Congress could have impeached Nixon, and then he could called it null and void because they were trying to subpoena records that they had no right to and Congress was actually trying usurp the Executive Branch...then he orders the Military to protect him. In the meantime what does the bureaucracy do? Follow the President's orders or not? If not, then who do they listen to? If its Congress, its a violation of the separation of powers. What if the VP refuses to recognize the impeachment? If the impeachment goes to the SC, what if the decision falls on party lines? The decision immediately becomes "questionable". Plus any ruling they issue gives one branch more power...and then of course the question is, do they have the power to over rule an impeachment? So what if they don't take the case? Just a few of the problems...
In the case of Dump, he's surrounded himself with Generals, so he could have the military behind him. But here's the conundrum, was there any direct contact between Trump himself and Russia in regards to the election? Others around him can be taken down...which he could then pardon. But if he himself didn't actually partake of the crime, is that impeachable? Its like arresting and prosecuting a hostile witness... Granted they aren't very cooperative, but they are complying as required by law...but don't volunteer anything else. So he could challenge the impeachment as a power grab by Congress. However, in his case, this is less likely.
= new reply since forum marked as read
