General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsunderpants
(182,877 posts)mcar
(42,372 posts)FSogol
(45,525 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)spinbaby
(15,090 posts)And you know how I'm sure? Because I watch the tabloid headlines in the grocery checkout line and they're suddenly ignoring him.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Time will tell.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Buster Douglas was a 42-1 underdog when he beat the undefeated and seemingly invincible Mike Tyson for the heavyweight championship of the world . Douglas lost his title in his very first defense of it.
Chump ain't (sic) ten feet tall.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Every day is a new day in bizarro world.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)I used to be a news junkie, but lately I just watch TV Land.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Even though everyone has an idea of what went down, in the broad scheme of things, evidence that passes muster is hard to come by.
Remember that Clinton lied under oath and was found to have obstructed justice, but was not impeached by both houses, so kept his job, and his reputation over the long term.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)GallopingGhost
(2,404 posts)I have Erin Burnett on, and she just showed the clip of Twitler in WV saying that Russia had nothing to do with his win, and she asked the guy (didn't see who it was) something along the lines of, why he would say that if it wasn't true? Is she kidding?
And a couple minutes before that, she asked if maybe the investigation isn't becoming a witch hunt.
Why do these reporters insist on trying to give the con an out?
Just venting.
Blue Owl
(50,494 posts)n/t