Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,957 posts)
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 08:32 PM Aug 2017

Trump seeks to strip protections for nursing home patients

Advocate groups are rallying to protect an Obama-era rule that would give patients and their families the right to sue long-term care facilities. The Trump administration has threatened to roll back the rule and implement revisions that would make filing such suits virtually impossible.

The rule specifically states that facilities that rely on Medicaid or Medicare may no longer use forced arbitration clauses in their patient agreements. Forced arbitration, which nearly all facilities include in their standard contract, essentially prevents consumers from taking an organization or business to court, requiring them to hash out their problems in private.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) under President Trump first proposed the rollback in June, just months after the American Health Care Association (AHCA) and a group of nursing homes challenged the original rule in court. In November, a district court judge in Mississippi sided with the AHCA, preventing the policy from being implemented. According to The Hill, Judge Michael Mills stated that he was sympathetic to nursing home patients but couldn’t abide a federal agency overstepping its authority. The AARP, which backed the initial Obama-era rule when it was first introduced, issued a stern rebuke on Thursday, citing “grave concerns.”

“We are alarmed that CMS’ decision…will very likely have dangerous and harmful impacts on nursing facility residents, as well as their families, and place them at even greater risk than they faced before[…],” David Certner, AARP Legislative Counsel & Legislative Policy Director, wrote in a letter on Thursday. “…In short, pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements are wholly inappropriate where health and life are at risk.”

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-administration-moves-closer-to-effectively-banning-patients-from-suing-nursing-homes/

Don't fuck with seniors Trump

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

underpants

(182,791 posts)
1. Arbitration is a lose-lose for individuals
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 08:41 PM
Aug 2017

Take disability at the fault of the manufacturer or supplier- you get the % of disability Times your projected earnings to retirement age LESS regular monthly expenses.

Sue in court and if you win (depending on where and what occurred) you could get punitive damages. Economic factor. There's no economic factor in arbitration.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
2. Just proves how the fox is showing all these diversion crazy antics, while quietly stiffing
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 08:46 PM
Aug 2017

everyone below the radar. Just like EPA.

Elder abuse in nursing homes is rampant and disgusting and children need to be able to fight back.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
3. catch them with a nanny cam, post pics on youtube, twitter is the only way to stop the abusers.
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 08:55 PM
Aug 2017

people in nursing homes are very fragile, just a few days without enough hydration or kept dirty will kill them.

enough

(13,259 posts)
4. DU thread with the link to file your official comment on the rule change with the government:
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 09:18 PM
Aug 2017
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029428686

Deadline for comments is midnight tonight. Let them hear your comments.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump seeks to strip prot...