General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGun-Wielding "Oath Keepers" Hired as Security at San Francisco Right-Wing Rally
SAN FRANCISCO (KTVU) - The fate of the controversial 'Patriot Prayer' rally in San Francisco August 26 remains up in the air as the park permit is still under review.
And now new concerns have arisen since it's come to light that the rifle-toting, camouflage militia-men known as the 'Oath Keepers' have confirmed they will provide security for the event.
Mayor Ed Lee has made it clear that he believes the Golden Gate National Recreation Area should revoke the permit, which is still in its initial phase.
"It's not just [about free] speech and I think those that are [saying that], are missing the point," said Mayor Ed Lee, who admitted that he has huge security concerns over the planned event.
http://www.ktvu.com/news/274786545-story
madaboutharry
(40,211 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)RandySF
(58,823 posts)Open carry is allowe.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)RandySF
(58,823 posts)Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)People that do security side gigs regularly.
"The organization claims on its website that full membership is open to "currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, police, fire-fighters, other first responders (i.e. State Guard, Sheriff Posse/Auxiliary, Search & Rescue, EMT, other medical 1st responders, etc.) AND veterans/former members of those services," and that others who support the organization's mission can become associate members."
RandySF
(58,823 posts)Oath Keepers is a far-right,[1][2] anti-government[3][4][5][6][7][a] American organization associated with the patriot movement and militia movement.[8][9] The group describes itself as a non-partisan association of current and formerly serving military, police, and first responders, who pledge to fulfill the oath all military and police take to "defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic."[10] It encourages members some of whom are current and former U.S. military and law enforcement officers not to obey orders which they believe would violate the United States Constitution. The organization claims a membership of 35,000.[11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_Keepers
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)to know how many are "former" because they didn't make the cut or were fired.
The "mission" is what makes them all questionable. We have the National and State guards and we don't need a group of self-appointed militia.
From the Southern Poverty Law Center, a trusted source (unlike the website of the far-right Oath Keepers):
https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/oath-keepers
The Oath Keepers, which claims tens of thousands of present and former law enforcement officials and military veterans as members, is one of the largest radical antigovernment groups in the U.S. today. While it claims only to be defending the Constitution, the entire organization is based on a set of baseless conspiracy theories about the federal government working to destroy the liberties of Americans.
In Its Own Words
Imagine that Herr Hitlery [Hillary Clinton] is sworn in as president in 2009. After a conveniently timed domestic terrorism incident (just a coincidence, of course)
she promptly crams a United Nations mandated total ban on the private possession of firearms.
But Hitlery goes further, proclaiming a national emergency and declaring the entire militia movement (and anyone else Morris Dees labels extremists) to be enemy combatants.
Hitlery declares that such citizens are subject to secret military detention without jury trial, enhanced interrogation techniques, and trial before a military tribunal hand-picked by the dominatrix-in-chief herself. Hitlery then orders police, National Guard troops and active military to go house-to-house to disarm the American people and black-bag those on a list of known terrorists, with orders to shoot all resisters.
Stewart Rhodes, Enemy at the Gates column in S.W.A.T Magazine, April 2008
John [Mc]Cain is a traitor to the Constitution. He should be tried for treason before a jury of his peers which he would deny you.
He would deny you the right for trial to jury, but we would give him a trial by jury. Then after we convict him he should be hung by the neck until dead.
Rhodes, speaking in Tempe, Ariz., May 2015
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)Oath keeper bastards they end up arresting
most of them.
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)Response to RandySF (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Turbineguy
(37,329 posts)Altamont.
central scrutinizer
(11,648 posts)But neither should be given any semblance of authority. This won't end well.
Turbineguy
(37,329 posts)I've had dealings with the Hell Angels.
KelleyKramer
(8,961 posts)And just like with the Stones event, this is a recipe for disaster